Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
-understand the principles of operation of X-ray tubes and generators, the origin of X-rays and have a thorough understanding of imaging techniques and the use of X-ray equipment for conventional examinations
-have an in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
-have a good command of basic projection theory and know the basic principles of planning, performing and evaluating native examinations
-have a basic knowledge of pathological findings.
-has a basic knowledge of ultrasound techniques and is familiar with various examinations; preparation, execution and aftercare
-has a good understanding of different types of X-ray equipment for examining teeth and jaws
-can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation

Content

X-ray tubes and generators
Imaging techniques for conventional examinations
Anatomy
Basic projection theory, basics of image criteria
Ultrasound
Dental X-ray

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)