Study Guide

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Campus Alere, Spring 2026 according to the scedule

Materials

Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 17.02 2026
Re-examination 24.04.2026, 22.05.2026 and 11.09.2026

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Campus Alere, Spring 2026 according to the scedule

Materials

Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 26.03.2026
Re-examination 08.05.2026, 22.05.2026 and 11.09.2026

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

The students
- have skills in the process of laboratory tests and biochemical methodology
- can perform laboratory tests using different methods
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field.
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Biochemical tests using laboratory apparatus
Near patient tests

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021), Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014), Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.
Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (2014). Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U.
Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class / laboratory work, demonstrations, individual work, groupwork

Student workload

Analytical and examination methods
Performance of laboratory investigations and use of small and large instruments:
- ECG device and sample collection
- Urine microscopy, Urilux-S / Clinitek Advantus urine dipstick reader
- POC tests (Point-of-Care testing)
- Indiko – clinical chemistry analyzer
- Medikro – spirometry exercises
- CellDyn Emerald – automated cell counter
- Blood gas analyzer
- ACL – coagulation analyzer

Further information

Mandatory attendance.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam, individual practice or movie making: pass or fail
Approved assignments: pass or fail

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
- are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
- are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
- consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

Content

Molecular biological methods
Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Location and time

The laboratory work is done in Vaasa at Technobotnia
Laboratory work in Electrophoresis Spring 2026, according to schedule
Laboratory work in Molecular Biology Spring 2027, according to schedule

Materials

Laboratory instructions and accompanying theoretical material

Teaching methods

Laboratory work with documentation, and accompanying theory

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Student workload

Laboratory work in Electrophoresis and documentation (54 h)
Laboratory work in Molecular Biology and documentation (54 h)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The grade passed require presence during all laboratory work and documentation of the lab work

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Mandatory presence and documentation of the lab work

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Content

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Basic nursing care
Clinical basic nursing care internship

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying blood cells
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

More litterature in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class and individual tasks

Exam schedules

Practical exam (microscopy) week 43.
Pracal re-exam week 44.

Student workload

1 sp = 27h work

1 sp Theory + individual task
2 sp Workshops; microscopy of blood cells
- Performing blood smear and microscopic examination
- Manual cell count in blood and body fluids - leukocytes, erythrocytes, thrombocytes, reticulocytes, eosinphils
- Flow cytometry and haematology analyser (B-PVK/-TVK)
- The ESR

Content scheduling

Major hematology parameters and basic techniques
- Introduction; blood smear; the full blood count and reference ranges.

Microscopic examination:
Peripheral blood cells in health and disease
- RBC morphology (normal); an introduction to disease of the RBC
White blood cells in health and disease
- Granulocytes; Monocytes; Lymphocytes; Plasma cells

Case studies in hematology

Further information

Course requirements:
Hematology 1
Biomethodology 1 - Microscopy

This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Clinical Hematology laboratory.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the group

Assessment methods and criteria

Attendance and practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam: pass or fail
Approved assignments: pass or fail

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance in class.

Teaching methods

Clinical practice in class and individual tasks.

International connections

Exam:
05.12.2025

Re-exam:
11.12. & 18.12.

Content scheduling

2 credits = 54 hours of work for the student.
Practical training in class during November - December with 100% mandatory attendance.

1 2,5h Introduction to course and methods in blood banking
2 2,5h ABO-blood group typing, Multi well tray & Tube method; sample collection (venipuncture)
3 2,5h Rh-blood group typing & Coombs test, Tube method
4 2,5h ABO- & Rh-blood group typing and blood group confirmation, Gel testing
5 2,5h Coombs & Compatibility testing, Gel testing
6 2,5h PRACTICAL+THEORY EXAM

Further information

Course requirements: Hematology 2

Mandatory attendance in class.

Competence:

The student can describe the methodological principles of the studies underlying transfusion activities and the factors affecting the reliability of these studies.
They know how to maintain the equipment used in transfusion activities.
They can justify the clinical significance of different blood group systems and transfusion practices.
They can assess when it is appropriate to deviate from standard procedures and know how to act in exceptional cases.
They can describe the responsibilities and tasks of the Blood Service, the hospital blood bank, and the treatment ward, and can provide guidance and advice to the care unit.
They know how to operate in accordance with the principles of sustainable development from the perspective of blood center operations.
Objectives

The student can:

Describe the flow of activities involved in pre-transfusion testing, including the roles of key units (e.g., Blood Service and hospital blood bank).
Explain the principles and clinical relevance of various tests included in pre-transfusion testing.
Review critical elements in labeling samples and ordering blood products to maintain reliability and accuracy.
Identify the conditions that can interfere with pre-transfusion testing.
Identify conditions and causes of positive results that may interfere with pre-transfusion testing, and suggest actions for unusual cases.


After the cours you should be able:
- to perform ABO & Rh grouping on the donor and recipients sample and understand its clinical implications
- to resolve discrepancies in the blood grouping; identifying factors affecting reliability in blood grouping and interpret unexpected results
- to determine when weak D testing is necessary based on clinical context
Pre-transfusion testing
- Regulatory bodies
- Testing methods
- Basic reactions

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have insights into the analysis of cells and tissues in relation to different organ diseases.
- have fundamental insights into cytology and histopathology
- command the clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within cytological and histopathological bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Cytological and histopathological bioanalysis
Clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Cell biology
Histology

Objective

The students
- have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
- understand the principles of the immunological methods.
- command advanced terminology of immunology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

Location and time

Våren 2026 på Campus Alere, Vasa

Materials

Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Marin, Burton and Roit, 13th edition, published by Wiley Blackwell, 2017 and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.

Teaching methods

Hybrid teaching methods
Group or individual assignment
Presentation

Exam schedules

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. In order to get a passed grade 70 % of the answers in the exam need to be correct.
Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade. Exam 20.03.2026. Re-examination 08.05 or 11.09.2026
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail. A failed grade means that the assignment was inadequat

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student

Further information

Additional information, tasks and quizzes is found in Moodle

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Immunology

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
- have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
- understand the importance of employee competence and the work community
- are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
- can function according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional business environment
- have basic insights into inner entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship in social and health care
- have insight into developing services that better meet the needs of users.

Content

Organizational activities and leadership
Entrepreneurship
Service design

Location and time

Alere Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures
Written assignment

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

According to teacher

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops, blended learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The calculation exam must be 100% correct for pass.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
- are able to collect specimens for microbiology
- are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
- have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Microbiological methodology
Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

Location and time

Novia, Vasa
Spring 2026

Vaasa Central Hospital, B2 Microbiology (Fimlab)

Mandatory attendance on every session.

Teaching methods

Laborations, lessons, visit to the laboratory, course assignment.

Employer connections

Fimlab personnel as lecturers and a visit to the Fimlab microbiology laboratory.

Student workload

1 credit = 27h
5 credits = 135h of work

Content scheduling

Basic microbiological testing and sample collection. Classification of bacteria Gram staining overview

Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

Gram−negative rods - Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Practical class: - Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods - Urine culture, sample collection and analysis

Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary Gram−positive cocci

Practical class: Identification of Gram−positive cocci - Throat culture: sample collection and culture

Practical class: Analysis of results and summary

Gram positive rods, anaerobic bacteria, yeasts, Moraxella, Neisseria and Haemophilus

Identification of unknown bacterial strains

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

For Approved course:
- 100% attendance at sessions.
- Passed laborations at the laboratory.
- Approved course assignment.

Qualifications

Clinical Microbiology, immunology, pathology 1 and 2

Objective

The students
- have profound knowledge of microbiological methodology and clinical bacteriology
- are familiar with the laboratory work process in its entirety, but also its phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
- understand the role of labotary results and result interpretation within microbiological bioanalysis.
- command the terminology of clinical microbiology.
- are able to use sources of information and scientific publications that are central to the field, concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within microbiological bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bio analysis.

Content

Microbiological methodology and clinical bacteriology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Microbiology
Microbiological methodology

Objective

The students
- are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
- understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
- master basic genetic calculations
- master terminology of molecular biology
- have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
- understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

Content

Genes, gene expression and genetics
Terminology of molecular biology
Methods in molecular biology

Location and time

Novia, Vasa
Spring 2026

Materials

Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures and tasks. Self studies.

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
- know the basic principles of radiation safety
- know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Use of gamma camera
The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
Nuclear medical pathology
Radiation safety
Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Materials

According to the lecturer

Medicinsk fysik. Berglund. E & Jönsson, B-A.

Teaching methods

Lectures and group assignment

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 81 h

Further information

More information is found in Moodle

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam. The calculation test is graded passed or failed. In order to pass the course both exam and the calculation test need to be passed

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject.
Calculation test failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

Students
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
- can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in the professional field
- can evaluate the quality of care and be aware of good sustainable choices in the work
- can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
- understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
- is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
- knows the uses of medical radiation
- has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
- has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

Content

Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
Quality development
Patient safety

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

Radiation safety: according to the lecturer, see Moodle

Teaching methods

Radiation safety: Lectures, workshops

Exam schedules

Radiation saftey: on-line examination

Student workload

Radiation safety 1sp= 27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Radiation safety: insufficient knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Radiation saftey exam:
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Radiation safety exam:
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Radiation safety exam:
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Exam schedules

Course examination 16.9.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

2 cp =54 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Material on Moodle

Henriksson, O., & Rasmusson, M. (2018). Fysiologi med relevant anatomi (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Sovijärvi, A., Hartiala, J., Knuuti, J., Laitinen, T., Malmberg, P., & Haapalahti, P. (2018). Kliinisen fysiologian ja isotooppilääketieteen perusteet (Nyaste upplagan). Duodecim.

Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U. (2014). Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Teaching methods

Lessons in classrooms
Practical exercises
Assignments on Moodle
Exam

Employer connections

The course is held by a teacher from the clinical laboratory, Maria Lindewall.

Exam schedules

Examination 4.11.2025
Re-exams
21.11.2025 kl. 12-16
12.12.2025 kl. 12-16

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

3 sp = 81h

Further information

In the course we review the common physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods.

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Performed assignments and the course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam.

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

The students
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

Content

Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Location and time

Spring 2026
Week 14-21

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Fimlab https://fimlab.fi/
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti

Moodle

Teaching methods

Clinical laboratory practice

Content scheduling

8 week of clinical practice (37,5 h / week work at the practice organisation + 2,5 h / week selfstudies).
The practice is carried out during weeks 14-22 spring 2025.

Add up 8 weeks from the following:
3 weeks hematology (1 week coagulation, 1 week blood count analyser, 1 week microscopy)
1 week blood bank
5 weeks chemistry
3 weeks microbiology
2 weeks pathology/histology
2 weeks physiology
2 weeks sample collection (i.e. at a health care center)
1 week EKG

Further information

Course requirements:
Finnish
Swedish
Human Physiology and Anatomy 1 & 2
Organic Chemistry
Cell biology
Biomethodology
Hematological Methodology 1 & 2
Biochemical Methodology
Laboratory Methodology 1 & 2
Microbiological Methodology
Clinical Practice: The Basics of Bioanalysis

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved practice.
Mandatory participation in practice seminar at the end of practice.
Approved practice assignments.
Approved documentation in Moodle.

Qualifications

Clinical Laboratory Methodology

Objective

The students
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory testing process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory tests, both in the collection of specimens and near patient examinations.
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into clinical laboratory work and have developed a constructively critical and developmental grasp of the work.
- are prepared to carry out quality assurance and improvement.
- understand the ethical guidelines that are fundamental to the work
- are able to provide expertise and advise
- consider security and occupational safety
- have increased awareness of sustainable choices at work

Content

Can choose to do practical training from these:
Work Practice in blood and other specimens collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and is motivated for the work
Perform and take responsibility for their tasks
Follows instructions and the time schedule
Has the knowledge required for the work and can find new knowledge
Asks relevant questions for the own learning process and can make decisions
Can communicate and collaborate with other people in the team
Is aware of the ethical guidelines and consider safety

Qualifications

Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 1-3

Objective

The students
- have the ability to independently find new information.
- have the ability to acknowledge and analyze problems of the professional field in new situations.
- are able to use their computer in their professional work.

Content

Substance that supports the bioanalytical field

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

Content

Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Location and time

Spring 2026
Week 14-21

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Fimlab https://fimlab.fi/
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti

Moodle

Teaching methods

Clinical laboratory practice

Content scheduling

8 week of clinical practice (37,5 h / week work at the practice organisation + 2,5 h / week selfstudies).
The practice is carried out during weeks 14-22 spring 2025.

Add up 8 weeks from the following:
3 weeks hematology (1 week coagulation, 1 week blood count analyser, 1 week microscopy)
1 week blood bank
5 weeks chemistry
3 weeks microbiology
2 weeks pathology/histology
2 weeks physiology
2 weeks sample collection (i.e. at a health care center)
1 week EKG

Further information

Course requirements:
Finnish
Swedish
Human Physiology and Anatomy 1 & 2
Organic Chemistry
Cell biology
Biomethodology
Hematological Methodology 1 & 2
Biochemical Methodology
Laboratory Methodology 1 & 2
Microbiological Methodology
Clinical Practice: The Basics of Bioanalysis

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved practice.
Mandatory participation in practice seminar at the end of practice.
Approved practice assignments.
Approved documentation in Moodle.

Qualifications

Clinical Laboratory Methodology

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Campus Alere, Spring 2026 according to the scedule

Materials

Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 26.03.2026
Re-examination 08.05.2026, 22.05.2026 and 11.09.2026

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

The students
- are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
- understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
- master basic genetic calculations
- master terminology of molecular biology
- have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
- understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

Content

Genes, gene expression and genetics
Terminology of molecular biology
Methods in molecular biology

Location and time

Novia, Vasa
Spring 2026

Materials

Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures and tasks. Self studies.

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Campus Alere, Spring 2026 according to the scedule

Materials

Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 17.02 2026
Re-examination 24.04.2026, 22.05.2026 and 11.09.2026

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

Students
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
- can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in the professional field
- can evaluate the quality of care and be aware of good sustainable choices in the work
- can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
- understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
- is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
- knows the uses of medical radiation
- has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
- has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

Content

Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
Quality development
Patient safety

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

Radiation safety: according to the lecturer, see Moodle

Teaching methods

Radiation safety: Lectures, workshops

Exam schedules

Radiation saftey: on-line examination

Student workload

Radiation safety 1sp= 27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Radiation safety: insufficient knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Radiation saftey exam:
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Radiation safety exam:
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Radiation safety exam:
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
- understand the principles of the immunological methods.
- command advanced terminology of immunology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

Location and time

Våren 2026 på Campus Alere, Vasa

Materials

Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Marin, Burton and Roit, 13th edition, published by Wiley Blackwell, 2017 and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.

Teaching methods

Hybrid teaching methods
Group or individual assignment
Presentation

Exam schedules

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. In order to get a passed grade 70 % of the answers in the exam need to be correct.
Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade. Exam 20.03.2026. Re-examination 08.05 or 11.09.2026
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail. A failed grade means that the assignment was inadequat

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student

Further information

Additional information, tasks and quizzes is found in Moodle

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Immunology

Objective

The students
- have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
- are able to collect specimens for microbiology
- are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
- have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Microbiological methodology
Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

Location and time

Novia, Vasa
Spring 2026

Vaasa Central Hospital, B2 Microbiology (Fimlab)

Mandatory attendance on every session.

Teaching methods

Laborations, lessons, visit to the laboratory, course assignment.

Employer connections

Fimlab personnel as lecturers and a visit to the Fimlab microbiology laboratory.

Student workload

1 credit = 27h
5 credits = 135h of work

Content scheduling

Basic microbiological testing and sample collection. Classification of bacteria Gram staining overview

Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

Gram−negative rods - Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Practical class: - Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods - Urine culture, sample collection and analysis

Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary Gram−positive cocci

Practical class: Identification of Gram−positive cocci - Throat culture: sample collection and culture

Practical class: Analysis of results and summary

Gram positive rods, anaerobic bacteria, yeasts, Moraxella, Neisseria and Haemophilus

Identification of unknown bacterial strains

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

For Approved course:
- 100% attendance at sessions.
- Passed laborations at the laboratory.
- Approved course assignment.

Qualifications

Clinical Microbiology, immunology, pathology 1 and 2

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
- are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
- are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
- consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

Content

Molecular biological methods
Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Location and time

The laboratory work is done in Vaasa at Technobotnia
Laboratory work in Electrophoresis Spring 2026, according to schedule
Laboratory work in Molecular Biology Spring 2027, according to schedule

Materials

Laboratory instructions and accompanying theoretical material

Teaching methods

Laboratory work with documentation, and accompanying theory

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Student workload

Laboratory work in Electrophoresis and documentation (54 h)
Laboratory work in Molecular Biology and documentation (54 h)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The grade passed require presence during all laboratory work and documentation of the lab work

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Mandatory presence and documentation of the lab work

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have skills in the process of laboratory tests and biochemical methodology
- can perform laboratory tests using different methods
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field.
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Biochemical tests using laboratory apparatus
Near patient tests

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021), Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014), Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.
Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (2014). Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U.
Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class / laboratory work, demonstrations, individual work, groupwork

Student workload

Analytical and examination methods
Performance of laboratory investigations and use of small and large instruments:
- ECG device and sample collection
- Urine microscopy, Urilux-S / Clinitek Advantus urine dipstick reader
- POC tests (Point-of-Care testing)
- Indiko – clinical chemistry analyzer
- Medikro – spirometry exercises
- CellDyn Emerald – automated cell counter
- Blood gas analyzer
- ACL – coagulation analyzer

Further information

Mandatory attendance.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam, individual practice or movie making: pass or fail
Approved assignments: pass or fail

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance in class.

Teaching methods

Clinical practice in class and individual tasks.

International connections

Exam:
05.12.2025

Re-exam:
11.12. & 18.12.

Content scheduling

2 credits = 54 hours of work for the student.
Practical training in class during November - December with 100% mandatory attendance.

1 2,5h Introduction to course and methods in blood banking
2 2,5h ABO-blood group typing, Multi well tray & Tube method; sample collection (venipuncture)
3 2,5h Rh-blood group typing & Coombs test, Tube method
4 2,5h ABO- & Rh-blood group typing and blood group confirmation, Gel testing
5 2,5h Coombs & Compatibility testing, Gel testing
6 2,5h PRACTICAL+THEORY EXAM

Further information

Course requirements: Hematology 2

Mandatory attendance in class.

Competence:

The student can describe the methodological principles of the studies underlying transfusion activities and the factors affecting the reliability of these studies.
They know how to maintain the equipment used in transfusion activities.
They can justify the clinical significance of different blood group systems and transfusion practices.
They can assess when it is appropriate to deviate from standard procedures and know how to act in exceptional cases.
They can describe the responsibilities and tasks of the Blood Service, the hospital blood bank, and the treatment ward, and can provide guidance and advice to the care unit.
They know how to operate in accordance with the principles of sustainable development from the perspective of blood center operations.
Objectives

The student can:

Describe the flow of activities involved in pre-transfusion testing, including the roles of key units (e.g., Blood Service and hospital blood bank).
Explain the principles and clinical relevance of various tests included in pre-transfusion testing.
Review critical elements in labeling samples and ordering blood products to maintain reliability and accuracy.
Identify the conditions that can interfere with pre-transfusion testing.
Identify conditions and causes of positive results that may interfere with pre-transfusion testing, and suggest actions for unusual cases.


After the cours you should be able:
- to perform ABO & Rh grouping on the donor and recipients sample and understand its clinical implications
- to resolve discrepancies in the blood grouping; identifying factors affecting reliability in blood grouping and interpret unexpected results
- to determine when weak D testing is necessary based on clinical context
Pre-transfusion testing
- Regulatory bodies
- Testing methods
- Basic reactions

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have insights into the analysis of cells and tissues in relation to different organ diseases.
- have fundamental insights into cytology and histopathology
- command the clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within cytological and histopathological bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Cytological and histopathological bioanalysis
Clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Cell biology
Histology

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
- have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
- understand the importance of employee competence and the work community
- are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
- can function according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional business environment
- have basic insights into inner entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship in social and health care
- have insight into developing services that better meet the needs of users.

Content

Organizational activities and leadership
Entrepreneurship
Service design

Location and time

Alere Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures
Written assignment

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have profound knowledge of microbiological methodology and clinical bacteriology
- are familiar with the laboratory work process in its entirety, but also its phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
- understand the role of labotary results and result interpretation within microbiological bioanalysis.
- command the terminology of clinical microbiology.
- are able to use sources of information and scientific publications that are central to the field, concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within microbiological bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bio analysis.

Content

Microbiological methodology and clinical bacteriology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Microbiology
Microbiological methodology

Objective

The students
- have the ability to independently find new information.
- have the ability to acknowledge and analyze problems of the professional field in new situations.
- are able to use their computer in their professional work.

Content

Substance that supports the bioanalytical field

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Content

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Basic nursing care
Clinical basic nursing care internship

Objective

The students
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
- know the basic principles of radiation safety
- know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Use of gamma camera
The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
Nuclear medical pathology
Radiation safety
Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Materials

According to the lecturer

Medicinsk fysik. Berglund. E & Jönsson, B-A.

Teaching methods

Lectures and group assignment

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 81 h

Further information

More information is found in Moodle

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam. The calculation test is graded passed or failed. In order to pass the course both exam and the calculation test need to be passed

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject.
Calculation test failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Material on Moodle

Henriksson, O., & Rasmusson, M. (2018). Fysiologi med relevant anatomi (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Sovijärvi, A., Hartiala, J., Knuuti, J., Laitinen, T., Malmberg, P., & Haapalahti, P. (2018). Kliinisen fysiologian ja isotooppilääketieteen perusteet (Nyaste upplagan). Duodecim.

Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U. (2014). Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Teaching methods

Lessons in classrooms
Practical exercises
Assignments on Moodle
Exam

Employer connections

The course is held by a teacher from the clinical laboratory, Maria Lindewall.

Exam schedules

Examination 4.11.2025
Re-exams
21.11.2025 kl. 12-16
12.12.2025 kl. 12-16

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

3 sp = 81h

Further information

In the course we review the common physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods.

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Performed assignments and the course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam.

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying blood cells
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

More litterature in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class and individual tasks

Exam schedules

Practical exam (microscopy) week 43.
Pracal re-exam week 44.

Student workload

1 sp = 27h work

1 sp Theory + individual task
2 sp Workshops; microscopy of blood cells
- Performing blood smear and microscopic examination
- Manual cell count in blood and body fluids - leukocytes, erythrocytes, thrombocytes, reticulocytes, eosinphils
- Flow cytometry and haematology analyser (B-PVK/-TVK)
- The ESR

Content scheduling

Major hematology parameters and basic techniques
- Introduction; blood smear; the full blood count and reference ranges.

Microscopic examination:
Peripheral blood cells in health and disease
- RBC morphology (normal); an introduction to disease of the RBC
White blood cells in health and disease
- Granulocytes; Monocytes; Lymphocytes; Plasma cells

Case studies in hematology

Further information

Course requirements:
Hematology 1
Biomethodology 1 - Microscopy

This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Clinical Hematology laboratory.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the group

Assessment methods and criteria

Attendance and practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam: pass or fail
Approved assignments: pass or fail

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory testing process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory tests, both in the collection of specimens and near patient examinations.
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into clinical laboratory work and have developed a constructively critical and developmental grasp of the work.
- are prepared to carry out quality assurance and improvement.
- understand the ethical guidelines that are fundamental to the work
- are able to provide expertise and advise
- consider security and occupational safety
- have increased awareness of sustainable choices at work

Content

Can choose to do practical training from these:
Work Practice in blood and other specimens collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and is motivated for the work
Perform and take responsibility for their tasks
Follows instructions and the time schedule
Has the knowledge required for the work and can find new knowledge
Asks relevant questions for the own learning process and can make decisions
Can communicate and collaborate with other people in the team
Is aware of the ethical guidelines and consider safety

Qualifications

Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 1-3

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

According to teacher

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops, blended learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The calculation exam must be 100% correct for pass.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Exam schedules

Course examination 16.9.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

2 cp =54 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None