Development of Science in NursingLaajuus (3 cr)
Code: VÅ26UV01
Credits
3 op
Objective
The Student:
- understands their own scientific professional field
- is familiar with the historical and theoretical development of nursing science
- knows various nursing theories, models, and perspectives, as well as their areas of application
- can reflect on the relationship between theory, evidence, and clinical practice
- can reflect on and strengthen their professional role as a nurse
- understands the nurse's responsibility and independent function within the care team
- has insight into development and innovation methods in healthcare
- understands the importance of continuous learning and demonstrates societal engagement
Content
Nursing science knowledge as the foundation for care, and its development
Important theories, models, and perspectives in nursing and nursing research
Person-centered care as a nursing science foundation
The nurse's role in developing care
Development and innovation in healthcare
Societal influence and debate
Continuous learning
Qualifications
No prior requisites
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views.
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.