Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- understands the importance of patient- and client safety in healthcare
- masters the central knowledge base for patient- and client safety
- can describe the conditions and challenges of working with patient- and client safety within social and healthcare sectors
- is familiar with laws and recommendations regarding the supervision of patient- and client safety in Finland
- understands how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting, and follow-up
- can describe the opportunities and challenges of ensuring patient- and client safety when using welfare technology
- can describe what a safety culture entails
- reflects on ethical considerations for the patient/client in the digital world

Content

Online course: Client- and Patient Safety with competence in Potilasturvaportti
Central concepts and themes in patient- and client safety
Welfare technology as a tool supporting patient- and client safety
Safety for the patient and client in the digital world

Qualifications

No prior requisites

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views.

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.