Study Guide

Objective

Student
- has in-depth knowledge of sexual health
- has learning and supervision skills in issues related to sexual health and family planning
- has insights into the importance of cultural sensitivity in midwifery activities
- has in-depth knowledge of gynecological care and gynecological special issues in midwifery

Content

Gyekologi
Sexual health

Location and time

Spring 2023
Novia, Alere

Materials

Tapanainen,J., Heikinheimo, O.& Kaarin Mäkikallio, K. (toim.) 2019 (eller 2011). Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Duodecim. (kap. 1-17, 20-31 i 2019 års upplaga)(kap. 2-12, 14-28 i 2011 års upplaga)

Lundgren, I., Blix, E., Gottfredsdóttir, H., Wikberg, A. & Aagaard Nohr, E. (Eds.) 2022. Theories and perspectives for midwifery - a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Oscarsson M. & Gerorgsson S. (red.). (2021). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

www.terveysportti.fi
Other literature during the course.

Teaching methods

Lectures, group works, discussion, video, demonstration, practical exercises, individual work, written exam.

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Validation according to general directives in Novia.
Home exam deadline 4.5 kl 12
Retake exams on two general exam days: 26th of May and 25th of August 2023

Registration on peppi is compulsory for re take exams no later than the Monday before the exam.
in the retake Tapanainen et al. see above or equivalent litterature in English + Moodle material both lectures and groups works are included.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Lectures
Compulsory attendance at practical exercises and group work
Home exam

Student workload

27h/cr 3x27h=81h
31h i klass
3x4h lectures online
3x4h group work and discussion, compulsory attendance,
3h theory +4h practical exercises, compulsory attendance in class
50h own work, reading and writing the home exam

Content scheduling

-

Further information

The content of the course will be on the Moodle course.
Terese Österberg will have 3+4h on gynecological examinations in school, other lectures and group work will be held by Anita Wikberg.
Mornings are lectures and short discussions, afternoons are group work.
Participation in group work is compulsory.
Feedback on home exam is given generally for the whole group via e-mail
Novia instructions should be used for the home exam, especially conserning references.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam 40p
21-24=1
25-28=2
29-32=3
33-36=4
37-40=5


After the exam this scale was lowered with 2 points for everyone, so that for example, 23-24 p was grade 2 to include all students good presentations of group works.

Qualifications

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Medical and surgical 1
Medical and surgical 2
Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
Mental health and psychiatry
Bedömning