Study Guide

Objective

Student
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
- has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
- is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
- knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
- has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
- has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
- can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
- is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

Content

Psychiatric disorders

Qualifications

No prior knowledge

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.