Skip to main content

Nursing Care of the Patient with Substance Use DisordersLaajuus (3 cr)

Code: VÅV18KV15

Credits

3 op

Objective

Student
- can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
- has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
- can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
- is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
- is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders

Content

Substance use disorders
Addiction

Qualifications

No prior knowledge

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Enrollment

01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023

Timing

02.01.2023 - 22.01.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Virtual portion

2 op

RDI portion

1 op

Mode of delivery

34 % Contact teaching, 66 % Distance learning

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages
  • Svenska
Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Nursing
  • Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
  • Degree Programme in Midwifery
Teachers
  • Marlene Gädda
Teacher in charge

Marlene Gädda

Groups
  • UBM20D-V
    Barnmorska (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
  • UHV20D-V
    Hälsovårdare (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa

Objective

Student
- can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
- has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
- can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
- is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
- is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders

Content

Substance use disorders
Addiction

Location and time

Spring 2023
Novia Vasa, Alere

Teaching methods

Lectures
Groupwork
Self studies
Study visit?

Completion alternatives

Groupwork - seminare
Assignments; selfstudy

Student workload

27h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

According to Novias criteria for written assignment

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prior knowledge