New Methods in the Clinical LaboratoryLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: SHV22BA02
Credits
5 op
Objective
The student:
Anticipates the development of new laboratory methods in the chosen area of clinical laboratory expertise and applies acquired knowledge in multi-professional teams
Is able to plan, execute and evaluate the implementation and development of clinical laboratory methods
Content
New laboratory methods
Implementation and evaluation of of clinical laboratory methods
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Materials
According to the lecturer's instructions
Enrollment
01.12.2022 - 19.01.2023
Timing
20.01.2023 - 17.03.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Åbo, Henriksgatan 7
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
- Ulla Penttinen
Teacher in charge
Ulla Penttinen
Groups
-
SHV22HD-ÅSocial- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
-
SHV22HD-VSocial- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa
Objective
The student:
Anticipates the development of new laboratory methods in the chosen area of clinical laboratory expertise and applies acquired knowledge in multi-professional teams
Is able to plan, execute and evaluate the implementation and development of clinical laboratory methods
Content
New laboratory methods
Implementation and evaluation of of clinical laboratory methods
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Qualifications
No prerequisites