Study Guide

Objective

The student:
- is able to handle patient/client health and disease conditions, through adequate medical history, status assessment and treatment
- is able to teach and guide patients/clients
- is able to create and maintain effective relationships with patients/clients and colleagues
- is able to clarify the professional role of the advanced clinical nurse

Content

Advanced clinical nursing care

Location and time

Spring 2024

Materials

Alotaibi T, Al Anizi CA. The impact of advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) role on adult patients with cancer: A quantitative systematic review. Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Dec;56:151370. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151370.
Buckley L, Robertson S, Wilson T, Sharpless J, Bolton S. The Role of the Specialist Nurse in Gynaecological Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Sep 11;20(10):83. doi: 10.1007/s11912-018-0734-6.
Craswell A, Dwyer T. Reasons for choosing or refusing care from a nurse practitioner: Results from a national population-based survey. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3668-3676. doi: 10.1111/jan.14176.
Heale R, Rietze L, Hill L, Roles S. Development of Nurse Practitioner Competencies for Advance Care Planning. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018 Apr;20(2):166-171. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000425.
Jackson A, Carberry M. The advance nurse practitioner in critical care: a workload evaluation. Nurs Crit Care. 2015 Mar;20(2):71-7. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12133.
Townsend K, Johnson KS, Jones S, Spurlock A. Nurse Practitioner's Confidence and Competence of Advance Directives: The Benefits of an Educational Program. Hosp Top. 2023 May 2:1-7. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2023.2201693. Epub ahead of print.
You are allowed to find other articles but don’t forget to add the list of articles you have used in the end of your work.

Teaching methods

Lecture and seminar

Exam schedules

see Moodle

Completion alternatives

Seminar is obligatory

Student workload

1 ECTS=27 hours

Further information

instruction for the task and the aims will be given in the first lecture

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student:
Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop professional skills
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning
Works in a planned manner and has accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has advanced knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at advanced level
Knows the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients/clients/customers
Can cooperate with others in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student did not achieve any of the criteria points, in the task requirement ( see in Moodle)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points, conduct frail interview, and weak analysis of the results

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable interview, the analysis and the results presentation gave good knowledge about the topic

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding

Qualifications

SHV18AK01, The professional paradigm of a Nurse practioner
SHV14AK02, Anatomy and pathophysiology
SHV14AK03, Clinical assessment and nursing care
SHV14AK04, Clinical Pharmacology