Methods of Development and EvaluationLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: HCS22EB03
Credits
5 op
Objective
The student:
- is able to define structure, service and outcome quality and meaning of quality assurance from the different perspectives
- is able to identify and apply prevailing quality assessment methods and quality standards within social and health care
- is able to describe the most central quality management systems within social- and health care
- is able to integrate quality assurance and quality improvement to her/his professional duties
- is able to plan and implement evaluation of one’s work field/activity/operation
Content
Perspective on quality management, quality policy, quality system
Quality standards within social and health care organization
Quality assurance, quality improvement and control as well as methods for constant quality improvement
Central quality management systems in Finland within social and health care
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar
Materials
According to the lecturer's instructions
Enrollment
02.08.2024 - 24.10.2024
Timing
01.08.2024 - 08.11.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Åbo, Henriksgatan 7
Teaching languages
- English
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
- Camilla Strandell-Laine
Teacher in charge
Camilla Strandell-Laine
Groups
-
SHV23HD-VSocial- och hälsovård, h23, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa
-
SHV23HD-ÅSocial- och hälsovård, h23, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
Objective
The student:
- is able to define structure, service and outcome quality and meaning of quality assurance from the different perspectives
- is able to identify and apply prevailing quality assessment methods and quality standards within social and health care
- is able to describe the most central quality management systems within social- and health care
- is able to integrate quality assurance and quality improvement to her/his professional duties
- is able to plan and implement evaluation of one’s work field/activity/operation
Content
Perspective on quality management, quality policy, quality system
Quality standards within social and health care organization
Quality assurance, quality improvement and control as well as methods for constant quality improvement
Central quality management systems in Finland within social and health care
Location and time
Online and introduction on Campus
6.9 at 8.15-11.30 Introduction and lecture on Campus
26.9 at 12.30-15.45 Online
31.10a at 12.30-15.45 Online
Materials
ntroduced in the course moodle page
Teaching methods
Lectures, individual studies and group work.
Student workload
1 ECTS credit = 27h
5 ECTS credits = 135h
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar
Assessment methods and criteria
Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle
Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
Makes versatile use of literature
Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically
Qualifications
No prerequisites
Enrollment
15.06.2023 - 30.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 31.10.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Åbo, Henriksgatan 7
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
- Marica Hinders
Teacher in charge
Marica Hinders
Groups
-
HCS22F-ÅHealth Care and Social Services, 2022 full-time studies
-
HCS22P-ÅHealth Care and Social Services, 2022 part-time studies
-
SHV22HD-ÅSocial- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Åbo
-
SHV22HD-VSocial- och hälsovård, h22, högre yh, deltidsstudier, Vasa
Objective
The student:
- is able to define structure, service and outcome quality and meaning of quality assurance from the different perspectives
- is able to identify and apply prevailing quality assessment methods and quality standards within social and health care
- is able to describe the most central quality management systems within social- and health care
- is able to integrate quality assurance and quality improvement to her/his professional duties
- is able to plan and implement evaluation of one’s work field/activity/operation
Content
Perspective on quality management, quality policy, quality system
Quality standards within social and health care organization
Quality assurance, quality improvement and control as well as methods for constant quality improvement
Central quality management systems in Finland within social and health care
Location and time
28.8. at 15-18 Introduction and lecture, online
25.9 at 15-18 Seminar, online
Materials
Introduced in the course moodle page
Teaching methods
Lectures, individual studies and group work.
Online
Student workload
1c = 27h
5c= 135h
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar
Assessment methods and criteria
Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle
Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
Makes versatile use of literature
Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically
Qualifications
No prerequisites