Please select the curriculum by the start year of studies and competence track.
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Price, A., Smith, S. & Challiner, A. 2016. Ward-based Critical Care. A Guide for Health Professionals. 2nd Edition.
Holbery, N & Newcombe, P. 2016. Emergency Nursing at a Glance.
WHO, Emergency & Trauma Care Training Course. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s16382e.pdf
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021. https://www.cprguidelines.eu/
lectures, (online lectures are not recorded)
case studies
discussions
group-work
Grade 0 - 5
English
07.11.2022 - 14.05.2023
15.06.2022 - 06.11.2022
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Moodle exam April/May 2023
Re-take 1
Re-take 2
In cooperation with Vasa Centralsjukhus, Elvytys-viikko
Moodle exam spring 2023
3 x 27 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Price, A., Smith, S. & Challiner, A. 2016. Ward-based Critical Care. A Guide for Health Professionals. 2nd Edition.
Holbery, N & Newcombe, P. 2016. Emergency Nursing at a Glance.
WHO, Emergency & Trauma Care Training Course. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s16382e.pdf
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021. https://www.cprguidelines.eu/
Practice in class, simulation exercise
Pass /fail
English
07.11.2022 - 18.12.2022
15.06.2022 - 11.12.2022
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Practical examination, pass/fail
In cooperation with Vasa Centralsjuhus, Elvytysviikko 2023
Spring 2023
Irén Vikström-Dahl
50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning
Course books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
Additional recommended books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Lecture material and exercises on Moodle
Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.
The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam and virtual tests
English
29.08.2022 - 13.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Ruwang Han
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Course examination is scheduled
Re-examination of the course is possible x and y
Lectures and examination 31 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 77 h.
Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Irén Vikström-Dahl
50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning
Course books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
Additional recommended books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Lecture material and exercises on Moodle
Online
Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.
The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam and virtual tests
English
29.08.2022 - 13.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Ruwang Han
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Course examination is scheduled
Re-examination of the course is possible x and y
Lectures and examination 31 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 77 h.
Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Face-to-face
According to the lecturer
Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments, completed and approved assignments (oral and written).
Pass/fail.
English
29.08.2022 - 18.06.2023
30.07.2022 - 11.12.2022
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
-
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Nursing, Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
Approved assignments.
-
Information on Moodle.
-
3 x 27 h = 81 hours
-
Ulla Penttinen
Face-to-face
Ulla Penttinen. Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology. Hand-outs on moodle.
Murray, Rosenthal, Pfaller. Medical microbiology. 8th edition. Elsevier 2016
Murray. Basic Medical Microbiology. Elsevier 2017
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30263032/
Huether, McCane, Brasher, Rote. Understanding pathophysiology. 2017
Kumar, Cotran, Robbins. Basic pathology.
Phillips, Murray & Crocker. The Biology of Disease. Blackwell Science.
ebook: Lippincott, Springhouse. Just the facts: Pathophysiology
Khanacademy Health and medicine
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/health-and-medicine
Lectures
Assignments
Current topics
Individual studies
Written exam at campus
English
19.09.2022 - 15.01.2023
15.06.2022 - 18.09.2022
Ulla Penttinen
CONTENT
A CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Microbes and microbiology
Microbiota (Microbiome)
Spreading of microbes and modes for transmission
Microbes, infection and disease
Antimicrobial resistance
Clinical microbiology (bacteriology, virology, mycology, protozoology)
B IMMUNOLOGY
The immune system
Immunisation and immunity
C PATHOLOGY
Aetiology
Inflammation
Pathophysiology of disease
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)
Exam 1 week 48
Exam 2 week 2/2023
Retakes
20.1
10.2
10.3
21.4
5 credits is 5 x 27 hours of work for the student, 135 h work
Ulla Penttinen
Face-to-face
Ulla Penttinen. Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology. Hand-outs on moodle.
Murray, Rosenthal, Pfaller. Medical microbiology. 8th edition. Elsevier 2016
Murray. Basic Medical Microbiology. Elsevier 2017
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30263032/
Huether, McCane, Brasher, Rote. Understanding pathophysiology. 2017
Kumar, Cotran, Robbins. Basic pathology.
Phillips, Murray & Crocker. The Biology of Disease. Blackwell Science.
ebook: Lippincott, Springhouse. Just the facts: Pathophysiology
Khanacademy Health and medicine
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/health-and-medicine
Lectures
Assignments
Current topics
Individual studies
Written exam at campus
English
19.09.2022 - 15.01.2023
15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022
Ulla Penttinen
CONTENT
A CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Microbes and microbiology
Microbiota (Microbiome)
Spreading of microbes and modes for transmission
Microbes, infection and disease
Antimicrobial resistance
Clinical microbiology (bacteriology, virology, mycology, protozoology)
B IMMUNOLOGY
The immune system
Immunisation and immunity
C PATHOLOGY
Aetiology
Inflammation
Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and tumors
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)
Exam 1 week 48
Exam 2 week 2/2023
Retakes
20.1
10.2
10.3
21.4
5 credits is 5 x 27 hours of work for the student, 135 h work
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Berman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen, G. 2016. (10nd ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Hess, C. 2013. Clinical guide to Skin & Wound Care. 7th Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins.
Lectures
Clinical practice in class + independent training
Demonstration
Seminars
Pass/fail
English
13.02.2023 - 16.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 12.02.2023
Mikaela Engvall, Nina Vestö, Hanna Limnell
Compulsory attendance at practice in class
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Virtual test on Moodle
Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam or movie making
Approved assignments
4 x 27 h = 108
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars
Clinical Practice 40h / week in six weeks.
Mandatory attendance 100%
mandatory attendace at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments
English
22.08.2022 - 27.11.2022
02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022
Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or tto find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
Read instructions in Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
40 h/week during clinical training
6 weeks of practice
See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.
The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
Can be responsible for safe drug handling
Can use HaiPro
Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
patients and relatives
Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
cultural affiliation
Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
nursing context
Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
professional secrecy
https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.pdf
Camilla Mattjus
Face-to-face
Literature to be found online on databases
See Moodle course.
Lectures in class, possible online
Group work
Self studies
External lectures
Seminars
See below, please
English
24.04.2023 - 11.06.2023
01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022
Camilla Mattjus, Maj-Helen Nyback, Vasa - timlärare Vård
-
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Three smaller assignments:
Poster on tropical diseases
Assignment on different concepts
Reflective diary about cultural competence
Discussion and group work
2 retakes are possible if needed on general exam days in August and September.
Registration is needed well in advace
Students from many different cultures
1 cr= 27h work
3cr = 81h
22h lectures
2h external lecturer lecture
8h seminars
49h students individual and group work
-
0 = no participation or submission
1 = participation and submission in time, limited knowledge of the topic
2 = participating in discussion and assignment with satisfactory knowledge of the topic
3= show good knowledge of the topic
4= show interest and maturity in the topics
5= show an excellent insight in the topic
Sirkku Säätelä
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
E book ( includes drug calculation):
Medical-surgical nursing made incredibly easy!://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5122323
In swedish : Finnish legistlation about safe pharmacotherapy 2021
Drug calculation excersies online
https://testandcalc.com/quiz/index.asp
Documents and task according to instructions
Hybrid implementation
Flipped learning, online classrooms
Workshops online, assignments and tests online
Drug calculation workshops on campus/online
onlinetest grades 0-5
assignment passed/failed
calculation test 100% correct answers according to national instructions for drug calculation
English
29.08.2022 - 13.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 04.09.2022
Sirkku Säätelä
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Exam i drug calculation online /webex after 4 workshops
online test and assignets according to deadlines i moodle
27h/cr
Sirkku Säätelä
Distance learning
Online course Streamed lectures and information on moodle
Assigments and online test in moodle
English
13.02.2023 - 16.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 12.02.2023
Sirkku Säätelä, Anna-Lena Nieminen
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
3 credits
3 credits
H-5
at course end date, possibility to re take online
27h/cr
Camilla Mattjus
Face-to-face
All recommended literature will be found on Moodle at the start of the course.
Lectures, demonstrations, videos, assignments, written exam
The course is gradedpass/fail
The drug calculations part has to be 100% correct in order to pass.
English
10.10.2022 - 31.05.2023
15.06.2022 - 10.10.2022
Camilla Mattjus, Josephine Åberg, Tiia Finne, Irén Vikström-Dahl
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
The course examination will be scheduled in Peppi
3 Cr = 81h
Lectures and examination 35h, Self-studies and digital teaching methods 46h
Web based tasks must be approved, theory exam at least 50% correct and drug calculations 100% correct to pass.
Camilla Mattjus
Face-to-face
All recommended literature will be found on Moodle at the start of the course
Lectures, demonstrations, videos, assignments, written online exam
The course is gradedpass/fail
The drug calculations part has to be 100% correct in order to pass.
English
10.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022
Camilla Mattjus, Josephine Åberg, Tiia Finne, Irén Vikström-Dahl
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
The course examination will be scheduled in Peppi, but in the end of the course
3 cr = 81h
Lectures and examination 24h, Self-studies and digital teaching methods 57h
Web based tasks must be approved, theory exam at least 50% correct and drug calculations 100% correct to pass.
Sirkku Säätelä
50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning
E book ( includes drug calculation):
Medical-surgical nursing made incredibly easy!://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5122323
In swedish : Finnish legistlation about safe pharmacotherapy 2021
Drug calculation excersies online
https://testandcalc.com/quiz/index.asp
Documents and task according to instructions
Hybrid implementation
Flipped learning, online classrooms
Workshops online, assignments and tests online
Drug calculation workshops on campus/online
English
13.02.2023 - 02.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 12.02.2023
0 - 25
Sirkku Säätelä
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
1 credits
1 credits
H-5
Exam i drug calculation in class after workshops
online test and assignments according to deadlines i moodle
27h/cr
onlinetest grades 0-5
assignment passed/failed
calculation test 100% correct answers according to national instructions for drug calculation
Sirkku Säätelä
Face-to-face
E book ( includes drug calculation):
Medical-surgical nursing made incredibly easy!://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5122323
In swedish : Finnish legistlation about safe pharmacotherapy 2021
Drug calculation excersies online
https://testandcalc.com/quiz/index.asp
Documents and task according to instructions
Hybrid implementation
Flipped learning, online classrooms
Workshops online, assignments and tests online
Drug calculation workshops on campus/online
onlinetest grades 0-5
assignment passed/failed
calculation test 100% correct answers according to national instructions for drug calculation
English
06.02.2023 - 30.05.2023
01.12.2022 - 30.01.2023
Sirkku Säätelä
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Exam i drug calculation in class after workshops
online test and assignments according to deadlines i moodle
27h/cr
Camilla Mattjus
Face-to-face
All recommended literature will be found on Moodle at the start of the course
Lectures, demonstrations, videos, assignments, written online exam
The course is gradedpass/fail
The drug calculations part has to be 100% correct in order to pass.
English
19.09.2022 - 18.12.2022
02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022
Camilla Mattjus
Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
The course examination will be scheduled in Peppi
3 cr = 81h
Lectures and examination 24h, Self-studies and digital teaching methods 57h
Web based tasks must be approved, theory exam at least 50% correct and drug calculations 100% correct to pass.
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
Passed/failed (not translated)
English
28.10.2022 - 27.11.2022
08.08.2022 - 09.10.2022
Jannica Andtfolk
Prerequisites:
Swedish for Beginners/Finnish for Beginners
Drug therapy 1
First Aid and Basic Nursing
Patient Safety and Basic Nursing Skills
Gerontological Nursing and Rehabilitation
Intruduction and semnary is mandatory. (not translated)
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Clinical training 40 h/week for 4 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars.
Compulsory attendance 100%.
Seminar is mandatory! (not translated)
Approved assignments. (not translated)
27h/ 1 credit
162h/6 credits
Practice
40h/ week and 4 weeks. (not translated)
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care.
Passed/Fail
English
22.08.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 15.08.2022
Jannica Andtfolk
Introduction and seminar is mandatory.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Autumn 2022
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
Boström, A.-M., Rudman, A., Ehrenberg, A., Gustavsson, J. P., & Wallin, L. (2013). Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–12.
Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203.
Gonzol, K., & Newby, C. (2013). Facilitating Clinical Reasoning in the Skills Laboratory: Reasoning Model Versus Nursing Process-Based Skills Checklist. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 34(4), 265–267.
Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2012). The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.26 Issue( 1), 133-143.
Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live
Parvan, K., Hosseini, F. A., Jasemi, M., & Thomson, B. (2021). Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 21(1), 1–12.
Extra
Salmela, S., Koskinen, C. & Eriksson, K. 2017. Nurse Leaders as Managers of Ethical Sustainable Caring Cultures. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(4), 871– 882.
Salmela, S. & Nyström, L. The human being in need of nursing care – patient, customer or fellow human being? International Journal of Caring Sciences. Accepted for publication.
Nyholm, L. & Koskinen, C. 2017. Understanding and safeguarding dignity in patient care. Nursing Ethics, 24(4), 408– 418.
Theory lessons
Individual work
Group work
For an approved performance you need to hand in, individual task, group task and exam.
English
12.09.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022
Jannica Andtfolk
Introduction is mandatory
Seminar day is mandatory
Tentamina is mandatory
A lecture with excercises with Anita Wikberg on intercultural communication with an Swedish speaking nursing group
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Introduction is mandatory
Seminar day is mandatory
Tentamina is mandatory
Tentamina
Omtentamina
The dates are in moodle
1 credit 27 hour this course 5 credit so 135 hours.
Theory lessons online 20h (5ggr 4h)
Individually work 16h
Group work 27h
Searching of articles 8h
Own work (finishing assessment, reading for the exam ) 53h
Seminary 8h
Tentamina 3h
Lesson 1
Info
History of nurses
Article search (Gun Vestman)
Lesson 2
Ethics in Healthcare
Lesson 3
Models vs theories
Lesson 4
Caring and nursing
Lesson 5
Isbar and the nursing process
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
Boström, A.-M., Rudman, A., Ehrenberg, A., Gustavsson, J. P., & Wallin, L. (2013). Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–12.
Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203.
Gonzol, K., & Newby, C. (2013). Facilitating Clinical Reasoning in the Skills Laboratory: Reasoning Model Versus Nursing Process-Based Skills Checklist. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 34(4), 265–267.
Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2012). The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.26 Issue( 1), 133-143.
Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live
Parvan, K., Hosseini, F. A., Jasemi, M., & Thomson, B. (2021). Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 21(1), 1–12.
Extra
Salmela, S., Koskinen, C. & Eriksson, K. 2017. Nurse Leaders as Managers of Ethical Sustainable Caring Cultures. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(4), 871– 882.
Salmela, S. & Nyström, L. The human being in need of nursing care – patient, customer or fellow human being? International Journal of Caring Sciences. Accepted for publication.
Nyholm, L. & Koskinen, C. 2017. Understanding and safeguarding dignity in patient care. Nursing Ethics, 24(4), 408– 418.
Theory lessons
Individual work
Group work
For an approved performance you need to hand in, individual task, group task and exam.
English
19.09.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022
Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Jannica Andtfolk
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Introduction is Mandatory
Seminar day is Mandatory
Tentamina is Mandatory
Tentamina
Omtentamina
The dates are in moodle
1 credit 27 hour this course 5 credit so 135 hours.
Theory lessons online 16h (4ggr 4h)
Individually work 16h
Group work 27h
Searching of articles 8h
Own work (finishing assignments reading for the exam) 57h
Assignment 4h (readning lesson 3 by our own, model vs theory)
Seminary 4h
Tentamina 3h
Lesson 1
Info
History of nurses
Article search
Lesson 2
Ethics in Healthcare
Lesson 3 (study by your own)
Models vs theories
Lesson 4
Caring and nursing
Lesson 5
Isbar and the nursing process
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Anita Kvist
Face-to-face
The material will be on Moodle
Lectures
Exercises (oral and written)
Group work
Exams (oral and written)
During the course we'll focus on:
- Oral and written exercises
- Finnish everyday vocabulary
- Reading and listening comprehensions
- Grammar/language structures
0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
The final course grade is based on Level A1
English
12.09.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 12.09.2022
Anita Kvist, Irén Vikström-Dahl
The student will be able to:
- understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at meeting specific needs
- introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, possessions and healt
- interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help
- learn the basic grammar
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Oral and written exam.
We meet 2 times a week.
In the end of the course oral and written exam.
Anna Korhonen
Face-to-face
Study materials are provided by the teacher.
Recommended book: Suomen mestari 1 & 2
Online lectures, oral and written exercises and assignments, individual work and work in pairs.
The grade is based on work in class, homework and exams.
English
12.09.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022
Anna Korhonen, Irén Vikström-Dahl
More information about the course will be provided in Moodle and during the first lesson.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
- assignments and exams
- homework
- active participation during lessons
- attendance at least 80 %
Assignments and exams during the course.
3 credits = 81 h
32 h online lessons
49 h individual studies
- failed exam or assignments
- too much absence from lessons
- the student has unsatisfactory knowledge in the basics of Finnish.
The student has satisfactory knowledge in the basics of Finnish both orally and in writing.
The student knows the basics of Finnish well both orally and in writing.
The student is often able to apply skills learned during the course in simple every day situations.
The student knows the basics of Finnish very well both orally and in writing.
The student knows how to apply skills learned during the course in simple every day situations.
Anita Kvist
Face-to-face
The material will be on Moodle
ONLINE Lectures
Exercises (oral and written)
Group work
Exams (oral and written)
During the course we'll focus on:
- Oral and written exercises
- Finnish everyday vocabulary
- Reading and listening comprehensions
- Grammar/language structures
0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
The final course grade is based on Level A1
English
24.10.2022 - 11.12.2022
15.06.2022 - 23.10.2022
Anna Korhonen, Irén Vikström-Dahl
The student will be able to:
- understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at meeting specific needs
- introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, possessions and healt
- interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help
- learn the basic grammar
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Oral and written exam.
We meet 2 times a week.
In the end of the course oral and written exam.
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Austin, M., Crawford, R., Klaassen, B. & Armstrong, V. J. (2016). First aid manual: The authorised manual of St John Ambulance, St Andrew's First Aid and the British Red Cross (Revised 10th edition.). Dorling Kindersley.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.
Moodle: Teachers notes
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA
Contact-teaching at Novia. Lectures. Practical training in class, demonstration, workshops, compulsory attendance
First Aid compulsory attendance
Pass/fail
English
02.01.2023 - 05.03.2023
01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023
Nina Vestö
After completed course in First Aid 1 and First Aid 2 you can bye an electronic First Aid card (Red Cross). Costs 13 euro/card
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Basic Nursing;
Virtual test on Moodle, practical test or movie making
First Aid;
Short theoretical test during lessons, group assignment
90 % correct compressions (CPR) time: 2 minutes
Virtual test on Moodle
Other tests during lesson time
4 x 27 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Austin, M., Crawford, R., Klaassen, B. & Armstrong, V. J. (2016). First aid manual: The authorised manual of St John Ambulance, St Andrew's First Aid and the British Red Cross (Revised 10th edition.). Dorling Kindersley.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.
Moodle: Teachers notes
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA
Contact-teaching at Novia. Lectures. Practical training in class, demonstration, workshops, compulsory attendance
First Aid compulsory attendance
Pass/fail
English
29.01.2023 - 09.05.2023
01.12.2022 - 28.01.2023
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Nina Vestö
After completed course in First Aid 1 and First Aid 2 you can bye an electronic First Aid card (Red Cross). Costs 13 euro/card
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Basic Nursing;
Virtual test on Moodle, practical test or movie making
First Aid;
Short theoretical test during lessons, group assignment
90 % correct compressions (CPR) time: 2 minutes
Virtual test on Moodle
Other tests during lesson time
4 x 27 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Austin, M., Crawford, R., Klaassen, B. & Armstrong, V. J. (2016). First aid manual: The authorised manual of St John Ambulance, St Andrew's First Aid and the British Red Cross (Revised 10th edition.). Dorling Kindersley.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.
Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Medicine Management Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Moodle: Teachers notes
Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA
Contact-teaching at Novia. Lectures. Practical training in class, demonstration, workshops
FIrst Aid 1, compulsory attendance
English
29.08.2022 - 26.02.2023
15.06.2022 - 04.09.2022
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Nina Vestö, Pia Nygårdas
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Practical test, virtual test
Marica Hinders
Face-to-face
National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
Ferraro, K., Janet M. Wilmoth, J. 2013 Gerontology : Perspectives and Issues, Fourth Edition
Mars, L. 2020. Dementia. Handbook and Resource Guide. Grey House Publishing
Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment
Lectures online and in class
Groupwork
Group work geriatrics: pass/fail
On line exam: grade 1-5
Written assignment rehabilitation: grade 1-5
English
02.04.2023 - 31.05.2023
01.12.2022 - 01.04.2023
Marica Hinders, Pia Nygårdas
Information about the course will be given the first lecture
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Written assignments and group report submitted (Rehabilitation and geriatrics)
Online exam (Geriatrics)
Seminar obligatory (Rehabilitation)
Retake: dates on Moodle
5 x 27 h = 135 h
The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Distance learning
Health Promotion
Snelling A. 2014 Introduction to Health Promotion.John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated (E-Book)
Wills, J & Leach , R. Fundamentals of Health Promotion for Nurses (E-Book)
Bergmann, K .E & Bergmann, R. 2003. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in the Family. (E-Book)
Up-to -date articles
Nursing Theorists:
Alligood, M.R 2018. Nursing Theorists and their work, Ninth Edition. U.S.A Elsevier.
Pender, Nola.J, Murdaugh, C & Parsons A.2011. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson cop. 2011.
Epidemiology:
Gordis, L. 2014. Epidemiology. Fifth Edition. Elsevier.
Porta, M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, sixth edition.2014.Oxford University Press, Incorporated (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Nutrition:
Sharma, S ,Barasi M , Sheehy T & Kolahdooz F. Nutrition at a Glance.2016 .John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.www.stm.fi
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. www.thl.fi
Introduction lecture, Web based studies - On line
Self studies/tutorials.
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
30-35= 1
36-41= 2
42-48= 3
49-54=4
55-60= 5
English
19.09.2022 - 06.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 19.09.2022
Anna-Lena Nieminen
The content of the course will be published on Moodle.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
4 credits
4 credits
H-5
Written examination week 44.
Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams
27 h/cr , 4 cr =108 h
108 hours individual work to do, several self studies and several written assignment during the course.
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Distance learning
Health Promotion
Snelling A. 2014 Introduction to Health Promotion.John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated (E-Book)
Wills, J & Leach , R. Fundamentals of Health Promotion for Nurses (E-Book)
Bergmann, K .E & Bergmann, R. 2003. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in the Family. (E-Book)
Up-to -date articles
Nursing Theorists:
Alligood, M.R 2018. Nursing Theorists and their work, Ninth Edition. U.S.A Elsevier.
Pender, Nola.J, Murdaugh, C & Parsons A.2011. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson cop. 2011.
Epidemiology:
Gordis, L. 2014. Epidemiology. Fifth Edition. Elsevier.
Porta, M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, sixth edition.2014.Oxford University Press, Incorporated (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Nutrition:
Sharma, S ,Barasi M , Sheehy T & Kolahdooz F. Nutrition at a Glance.2016 .John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.www.stm.fi
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. www.thl.fi
Introduction lecture, Web based studies - On line
Self studies/tutorials.
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
30-35= 1
36-41= 2
42-48= 3
49-54=4
55-60= 5
English
19.09.2022 - 06.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022
Anna-Lena Nieminen
The content of the course will be published on Moodle.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
4 credits
4 credits
H-5
Written examination week 44.
Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams
27 h/cr , 4 cr =108 h
108 hours individual work to do, several self studies and several written assignment during the course.
60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning
CVD references
Alexander, MF., Fawcett, JN., Runciman, PJ. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. 2012: pp. 7-72.
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. 2011: 867-1014.
Thaler, MS- The Only EKG Book You’ll Ever Need. The 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015 (you can use the previous additions as well)
Hematology:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2011. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 33; 1068 - 1117.
Alexander, M., Fawcett, J. & Runciman, P. 2012. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. Ch 11, 479 - 523.
Lectures and work shops
0-5
English
29.08.2022 - 13.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
written test and workshops
1ECTS=27 hours
Anna-Lena Nieminen
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
E- book:
Neal-Boylan, L.2011.vol 8 edition 1.Clinical Case Studies in Home Health Care. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. PRINT PUB DATE. 2011-08-30
Berman A. & Snyder S. (2016). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing, Global Edition. Pearsons. Unit 2. Chapter 7-8.
LeMone P. et al. (2015) Medical-Surgical Nursing: clinical reasoning in patient care. Pearsons. Boston. Unit 1. Chapter 3.
Health Care Comes Home: The Human Factors (2011): National Academies Press.
Mulley G., Bowman C. & Boyd M. (2014). The Care Home Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Sines d. et al (Ed.) (2013). Community and Public Health Nursing John Wileys & Sons, Incorporated.
Tuner K.J. (2012) Advances in Home Care Technologies: Results of the MATCH Project. IOS Press.
Articles.
Lectures, tutorials, work shop, individual assignments and group work
English
03.10.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 04.10.2022
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
2 credits
H-5
Group assignment seminars 24/11 12.30-16.00
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Face-to-face
See courses:
NU15TH01,
NU15RM02 -RM03 -RM04
Increasingly independent work, with the help of a supervisor
- collect and describe background information for the study
- desribe a theoretical framework for the study
- describe methods of data analysis
- collect data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
- present the methodological part of the thesis and show examples of the results at an intermediary seminar
Lecture and seminars
Pass/Fail
See practical guide to thesis writing
The manuscript for Intermediary seminar shall include following chapters:
Introduction
Background of the study
Theoretical framework
Aim, purpose
Method
Sampling/material
Data collection
Data analysis
Ethical issues
Examples of the result
English
29.08.2022 - 31.01.2023
15.06.2022 - 04.09.2022
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Approved manuscript for intermediary seminar, attendance at intermediary seminar
Presentation at intermediary seminar in September 2022
6cr= 6x27h= 162h
4h presentation and get together lecture, information + 8h seminar , 150h is independent work with the help of the supervisor.
See practical guide for thesis writing for grades 0-5 for final thesis.
Camilla Mattjus
Face-to-face
Depending on choice of theme/topic
See literature on writing and publishing in Moodle course
Themes/Topics to write about (the title of the article can be different)
1. The Social and/or Cultural Determinants of Health
2. The Equality of Health - a Global Challenge
3. Micro- and Macro-perspective in Health Care
4. To work as Nurse in Disaster/Vulnerable Areas
5. The Challenges of working in a Multicultural Team
6. Intercultural nursing care
7. To study nursing in a foreign culture/country
8. Braindrain of health care personnell from developing countries
9. Structural racism in health care
10. Equality and equity among patients with a different cultural background
11. To bring up a child in a forreign culture/country
12. To give birth in a new county/culture
13. Immigrants and mental health
14. To live in a country with a different religion
15. Cultural competence of immigrant nurses/ cultural competence among nurses
16. Rare diseases or tropical diseasees in the Nordic countries
See below
English
08.05.2023 - 23.11.2023
02.12.2022 - 16.04.2023
Camilla Mattjus
The assignment is individual.
Supervision and feedback is given from teacher on demand 2 times + final evaluation on Peppi. Please start early!
Evaluation can be booked before 10th of June or after 8th of August.
Deadline of all texts is 10th of October 2022.
The seminar will be on 25th of October 2022. An extra seminar has been added for the ones that want to finish their education earlier.
To be able to publish you need to have a grade 3 or above.
Use references correctly.
Do not write about your thesis topic or the same topics as you have written in CC02!
You will take part in the peer review process of one other student.
The peer reviewer should look at language, structure and content of the text.
Use Comments or Track changes in Word.
Do spelling and grammar checkup in Word before you send to peer reviewer and your supervisor.
Novia instructions for writing need to be followed, or the journal instructions if the article is going to be published in a specific journal
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Alternative 1. Write a short article (min 2000 words abstract with max 150 words excluded, references not included) about one of the topics above. Content: Introduction, Headings 1 - 3 and Conclusion
Alternative 2. Create a blog and update it on a regular base (minimum 4 times and minimum 500 words each time) during May- October 2022 where you write about one of the topics above
Alternative 3. Write a short debate article for a daily newspaper (following the guidelines for debate article) about one of the topics above
Use instructions for written assignments when writing an article (you can also use Vancouver or Harvard system). The aim is to publish your article in Novialia or a non-scientific nursing journal.
When publishing you need to have a second author, your supervisor. It will be Anita Wikberg. The second author (AW) gives supervision, reads and corrects manuscript and influences this way on the manuscript).
When writing a blog, the forum and manuscripts must be approved by the supervisor (AW) before publication. Use the given instructions for the forum where you publish your blog. The blog is published at Novia blogs. The supervisor's name will be mentioned in the blog.
When writing a short debate article, the manuscript must be approved by the supervisor and include the supervisors name before publishing.
The final manuscript must be sent to your supervisor through Urkund/ Ouriginal for all three alternatives
-
30th of September or 25th of October 2022
-
1cr =27h
3cr = 3x27h= 81h
2h introduction, 2h supervision, 2h peer review, 4-8h presentation
67-71h is independent work.
-
Grade one is not reached
Grade 1
The aim with the article is unclear and the literature is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient. The article is incohesive and reflects a flawed understanding of the scientific working procedure, as well as the inability to structure an article in a purposeful and accessible manner. However, the article has achieved the minor criteria for academic writing concerning text and references but cannot be published without major revisions
The aim for the blog is unclear and the literature is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient and the text mainly reflects the authors opinion rather than factual knowledge. The text has reached the minor criteria for approval but cannot be published without major revisions.
The aim with the debate article is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient. The text mainly reflects the authors own opinion rather than factual knowledge. The text has reached the minor criteria for approval but cannot be published without major revisions
Grade 2
The aim for the article remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge. The relevance of the study is described, but in a superficial way. Some of the sources are not relevant to the study. The ability for source criticism is weak. The study lacks systematicity and a logical structure. The article is somewhat incohesive and inconsistent and cannot be published unless major revisions are done.
The aim for the blog remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to factual knowledge. The relevance for publishing the text is described but in a superficial way. Some of the topics described are not relevant. The ability for source criticism is weak. The blog text does not rise attention and the text is somewhat incohesive and inconsistent and cannot be published unless major revisions.
The aim for the debate article remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to factual knowledge. It cannot be published unless major revisions.
Grade 3
The motivation for writing the article is independently described but remain general. The framework for the article is well-constructed and motivated. Central concepts are clearly introduced, but their mutual relationship remains unclear. The chosen literature and research is relevant but is used in an uncritical manner. The article can be published with minor revisions.
The blog is well motivated, independently described, but remain general. The blog text reflects actual and factual knowledge. The chosen literature is relevant. The text can be published with minor revisions.
The debate article is interesting, well-motivated but lack a clear and stringent aim that catches the readers interest. The text is not fluent. The text can be published with minor revisions
Grade 4
The aim with the article is clearly described, it is actual and interesting. The literature used is relevant and the student s ability for source criticism is good. The article is written in an academic style. With minor editing the article is ready for publication
The aim with the blog is clearly described, the text reflects factual and actual knowledge described in an interesting way. Relevant literature is used in a good way. The text is ready for publishing with minor revision.
The aim with the debate article is clear, it is independently described and rises interest. The factual and actual knowledge is reflected in the text and it is ready for publication with minor revisions.
Grade 5
The article is interesting, actual and well-motivated and the text is fluent. The references are actual and reflect the topic. The source criticism is good. The article sows the students ability to synthetizing text forming a new understanding. The article is ready for publication.
The aim with the blog is clearly described, the text rises the interest and is fluently written. It reflects actual and factual knowledge. The debate article is ready for publication
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
intra.novia.fi
Degree regulations in Novia UAS
Peppi
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)
Information and orientation about studies in Novia UAS
Online assignments
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.
Passed/failed for information part
Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.
English
29.08.2022 - 20.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Irén Vikström-Dahl
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Compulsory attendance
-oral presentation (video recorded)
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)
Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.
3 x 27 h = 81 hours
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
See Moodle
intra.novia.fi
Degree regulations
The course is conducted online
English
29.08.2022 - 09.10.2022
15.06.2022 - 28.08.2022
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Irén Vikström-Dahl
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Autumn 2022
1 cu = 27 h
Marica Hinders
Face-to-face
Beauvise, A.M. (eds) (2018) Leadership and Management Competence in Nursing Practice: Competencies, Skills, Decision-Making. Springer Publishing Company, ebook.
+ Literature to be found online on databases
See Moodle course.
Lectures, group work, case studies and self study
Case study for the part of occupational safety 1 cr. evaluated 0-5 ( 30% of the course)
Home test for the part of leading, managing and delegating in nursing care 2 cr. evaluated 0-5 ( 70% of the course).
English
10.10.2022 - 20.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 13.10.2022
Marica Hinders
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Case study and home exam
1 cr = 27 h
3 cr = 81 h
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
See Moodle for more information:
About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments
Practice in patient-centered nursing care in the medical field
Approved/Rejected
See separate framework for evaluation in moodle.
English
13.03.2023 - 04.06.2023
01.12.2022 - 23.04.2023
Marica Hinders, Jannica Andtfolk
Prior knowledge
Perioperative Nursing Care and Health Technology
Specialized Nursing skills
Practice: Elderly Care
Drug Therapy 1, 2 & 3
At least 2 of these:
Responses to Altered Hematological, Cardiovascular and Sensory Function
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Function and Urinary Elimination
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal, Neurologic and Respiratory Function
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
Only for degree students.
Not possible to validate.
Practice 40 h/week (38h at the practice place and 2h for your assignments from school) for 6 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars.
1 credit 27h, this course is 9 credits 243h.
40h/ week and 6 weeks = 240h
3 h for introduction
Failed performance in clinical studies:
A Has not reached the objectives of the internship section.
B Interest and motivation
• has shown little or no interest and has not taken sufficient responsibility for the work tasks
• does not follow the work list and does not keep agreed times
C Knowledge and skills
• does not work according to plan and has an unsystematic way of working
• has shown an unreliable way of working with clear errors and shortcomings
• have deficient knowledge and the knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only apparent
• has shown professional immaturity and may endanger patient safety
D Cooperation and treatment
• has poor communication and cooperation skills
• shows an unprofessional attitude
Passed performance in clinical studies:
A Satisfactorily achieved the objectives of the internship section.
B Interest and motivation
• can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and keeps agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to plan and has a basic accuracy in important work steps
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn
• can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
• can make decisions related to work tasks at a basic level
• knows the value base and considers the professional ethical principles
D Cooperation and treatment
• can communicate and respond to patients/clients/customers
• can collaborate with others in the work team
Åsa Lågland
Face-to-face
Jobiili, www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Central sjukhus, www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi
Terveysportti
Moodle - Practice documents from Curricula 2015
Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars
Pass /fail
English
22.08.2022 - 02.10.2022
02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland
Approved language interview at Vaasa Central Hospital before starting of practice
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Approved practice
Approved practice assignment
Compulsory attendance at seminars
Approved evaluation from clinical supervisors and supervising teacher
38 h/ weeks during clinical training
6 weeks of practice = 228 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents for Nursing 2021
Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars
English
02.01.2023 - 23.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022
Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents for Nursing 2021
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
Marlene Gädda
Face-to-face
on Moodle
Clinical Practice
Clinical practice
Approved practice
Approved written assignments
Participation in practice information and practice seminar
English
02.01.2023 - 23.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022
Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
Clinical practice
Approved clinical practice
Written assignments
Participation i seminars
Practice Seminar
40h/week; 38h/week Clinical Practice
Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and respects agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
• can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
• makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
• is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
D Collaboration and response
• can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
• can work with others within the work team
Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
• does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
C Knowledge and skills
• does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
• has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
• lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
• has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
D Collaboration and response
• possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
• shows an unprofessional attitude
Marlene Gädda
20% Face-to-face, 80% Distance learning
Videbeck, S.2014. Psychiatric mental health nursing
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4625052
Katona C, Cooper, C & Robertson, M.2015. Psychiatry at a glance
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4094470
Wrycraft, N.2009. An Introduction to Mental Health Nursing
O'Brien, P.G., Kennedy, W.Z. & Ballard, K.A. 2008. Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing
Smith, G. 2014. Mental health Nursing at a Glance
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1829439
Lectures
Groupwork
Seminars
Selfstudies
Criteria on Moodle
English
03.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
15.06.2022 - 06.09.2022
Marlene Gädda
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
4 credits
H-5
Tasks, Assignments and tests on moodle
Deadline 18.12.2022
27h/cr
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For the exam:
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
For the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
Marlene Gädda
Distance learning
Videbeck, S.2014. Psychiatric mental health nursing
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4625052
Katona C, Cooper, C & Robertson, M.2015. Psychiatry at a glance
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4094470
Wrycraft, N.2009. An Introduction to Mental Health Nursing
O'Brien, P.G., Kennedy, W.Z. & Ballard, K.A. 2008. Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing
Smith, G. 2014. Mental health Nursing at a Glance
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?
docID=1829439
According to instructions om Moodle
Onlinestudies on Moodle
Criteria on Moodle
Grades: Approved/Failed
and
Grades from 0-5
An average number of all tasks and assignments is counted as final grade
English
16.01.2023 - 30.04.2023
15.06.2022 - 15.01.2023
Marlene Gädda
The course is divided in sections with tasks and assignments. Follow the given instructions in the sections.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
5 credits
H-5
Tasks, Assignments on moodle
Deadline 30.4.2023
27h/cr
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
For the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
Anna-Lena Nieminen
67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning
MATERNITY CARE
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
National Institute for health and Welfare. 2020. We're having a baby a guidebook for expectant parents. Available at: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9
Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of nursing. Berman A., Snyder S. Chapter 21
CHILD, ADOLESCENT AND NEONATAL CARE
Quick Reference Guide to Pediatric Care
Deepak M. Kamat, Kelly J. Kelleher, Henry M. Adam, Rebecca A. Baum, Jatinder Bhatia, Deborah E. Campbell, Donna M. D'Alessandro, Thomas G. DeWitt, Jane Meschan Foy, and Athra Kaviani
Neonatology at a Glance
https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4038516
Atlas of Procedures in Neonatology
https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3417876
Nursing the Neonate
https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=707872
Martin, G. I. & Rosenfeld, W. (2018). Common problems in the newborn nursery: An evidence and case-based guide.
https://tritonia.finna.fi/novia/Record/tria.364332
Ball, J. Bindler, R., Cowen, K.& Shaw M.(2017) Principles of Pediatric Nursing. Caring for Children. Pearson Education, Seventh Edition.
Leifer, G. (2015). Introduction to Maternity and Pediatric Nursing. Elsevier, Seventh Edition.
National Institute for health and Welfare. www.thl.fi. Schoolhealth.
Lectures, demonstration, video, tutorials, written exam, practice, individual assignments
Grades 0-5
Maternity care exam 1 + Child, Adolescent and neonatal care 2 cr
28-30p = 5
25-27p = 4
22-24p = 3
19-21p = 2
16-18p = 1
10p from maternity care 20 from child, adolecent, neonatal and pediatric care
English
03.10.2022 - 06.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 02.10.2022
15 - 32
Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg
Maternity care 1 cr with Anita Wikberg
Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care 2 cr with Anna-Lena Nieminen
Retake exams: the two general exams after the course is finished, registration is necessary.
Retakes on 25th of November and 9th of December 2022
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
-
Maternity care, Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal and pediatric care:
Written exam last lecture in school 7th of November + retake on two gereral retakes
on 25th of November and 9th of December 2022
Discussion in the class with students from different countries
27h/cr 3cr=81h
Maternity care 1 cr:
lectures 12h, tutorials 13h, written exam 2h = 27h
Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care 2 cr:
lectures + practices 18h , tutorials 34h + written exam 2h=54h
-
none of the below
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Anna-Lena Nieminen
58% Face-to-face, 42% Distance learning
E- book:
Neal-Boylan, L.2011.vol 8 edition 1.Clinical Case Studies in Home Health Care. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. PRINT PUB DATE. 2011-08-30
Berman A. & Snyder S. (2016). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing, Global Edition. Pearsons. Unit 2. Chapter 7-8.
LeMone P. et al. (2015) Medical-Surgical Nursing: clinical reasoning in patient care. Pearsons. Boston. Unit 1. Chapter 3.
Health Care Comes Home: The Human Factors (2011): National Academies Press.
Mulley G., Bowman C. & Boyd M. (2014). The Care Home Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Sines d. et al (Ed.) (2013). Community and Public Health Nursing John Wileys & Sons, Incorporated.
Tuner K.J. (2012) Advances in Home Care Technologies: Results of the MATCH Project. IOS Press.
Articles.
Oncology:
Abraham, J., Gulley, J. 2019. The Bethesda Handbook of Clinical Oncology. Volters Cluwer.
Dark,G. 2013. Oncology at a Glance. Wiley-Blackwell.
Palliative Care:
Faull, C.& Blankley, K. 2015. Palliative Care. Oxford University Press, Incorporated
Lectures, tutorials, work shop, individual assignments and group work
English
02.01.2023 - 23.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023
Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders
Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
3 credits
H-5
Group assignment seminars 4/4 08.15-15.15
Palliative care: online web course
Oncology: individual exam Graded 0-5
7 sp
1 sp= 27 h.
Face-to-face
The material is on Moodle.
Homework
Helthcare text
Exercises in class
Diskussions
Presentations
English
03.10.2022 - 18.12.2022
15.06.2022 - 09.10.2022
Anita Kvist
Preparing the texts at home.
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Oral and written exam in the end of the course.
3 credits or 81 hours
Face-to-face
English
23.01.2023 - 21.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 22.01.2023
Anita Kvist
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Face-to-face
on Moodle
Clinical practice
Approved clinical practice
Written assignments
Participation i seminars
English
02.01.2023 - 23.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022
Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Nygårdas
Only for degree students
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
Clinical Practice
Clinical Practice
Spring 2023
40 h/week; 38h/week Clinical Practice
Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
B Interest and motivation • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills • follows the work list and respects agreed times • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
C Knowledge and skills • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work • can perform tasks under supervision • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
D Collaboration and response • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers • can work with others within the work team
Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
B Interest and motivation • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
C Knowledge and skills • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
D Collaboration and response • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills • shows an unprofessional attitude
Nina Vestö
80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning
Berman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen, G. 2016. (10nd ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Hess, C. 2013. Clinical guide to Skin & Wound Care. 7th Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins.
Lectures
Clinical practice in class + independent training
Demonstration
Seminars
English
29.08.2022 - 05.03.2023
08.08.2022 - 11.09.2022
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Mikaela Engvall, Pia Nygårdas, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam
Approved assignment
Moodle exam
Camilla Mattjus
Face-to-face
All recommended literature will be found on Moodle at the start of the course.
Blended learning, assignments
The course is graded 0-5
English
17.10.2022 - 11.12.2022
15.06.2022 - 23.10.2022
Camilla Mattjus
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Examination is a group assignment + presentation at the end of the course during seminars.
Lectures and examination 20h, Self-studies and digital teaching methods 61h
Face-to-face
All recommended literature will be found on Moodle at the start of the course
Distance learning (online)
The course is graded 0-5
English
12.09.2022 - 27.11.2022
02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022
Camilla Mattjus
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Examination is a group assignment + presentation at the end of the course during seminars.
Lectures and examination 20h, Self-studies and digital teaching methods 88h
Åsa Lågland
Face-to-face
Wicker, Paul. Perioperative Practice at a Glance, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2015. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1895109.
Berman, A. & Snyder, S. 2016. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts. process and Practice. Unit 8, Chapter 37.
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, P. (2015). Medical-Surgical Nursing Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 6 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey. Unit 2, Chapter 4: Nursing care of patients having surgery.
Timby, B. 2013. Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 th Ed. Wolters Kluvert Health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. USA.
Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis
Iivanainen, A., & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirja. SanomaPro oy. Helsinki.
E-book Ebrary: Stone, Julian & Fawcett, W. (2013). At a Glance : Anaesthesia at a Glance (1). Wiley-Blackwell.
Terveysportti
+ other recommended literature
Close- education at Novia: Lectures and workshops
English
29.08.2022 - 13.11.2022
15.06.2022 - 01.09.2022
Katarina Vironen, Daniel Nenonen, Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Written exam
Radiation safety: virtual exam
5 credits= 135 h
Radiation therapy 1c of 5c
Åsa Lågland
Face-to-face
English
03.04.2023 - 04.06.2023
01.12.2022 - 23.04.2023
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Anita Kvist, Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents for Nursing 2021
Practice in clinical settings
Practice seminars
Clinical Practice 40h / week in 4 weeks.
Mandatory attendance 100%
Mandatory attendance at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments
Work certificate and signed working list
English
29.05.2023 - 29.09.2024
01.12.2022 - 16.06.2023
Nina Vestö
Only for Degree students in Nursing
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
Approved internships or work as a practical nurse
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents for Nursing 2021
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
It is possible to do clinical training abroad. The student can do it through NordPlus or Erasmus networks or to find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
Work as a practical nurse for a minimum of 4 weeks
40 working hours/week
See separate framework for evaluation
See separate framework for evaluation
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Face-to-face
English
14.11.2022 - 31.07.2023
08.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Sirkku Säätelä, Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Jannica Andtfolk, Irén Vikström-Dahl, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda, Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Anita Kvist
Face-to-face
The material is available on Moodle.
Self-study
Oral and written exam.
European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is used for the assessment of knowledge of Finnish and other national languages. Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate
satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicate good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (the grade
1) the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.
https://www.oph.fi/sv/utbildning-och-examina/nivaskalan-sprakkunskap-och-sprakutveckling#48ac3886
English
27.02.2023 - 26.11.2023
28.11.2022 - 14.05.2023
Anita Kvist
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Anita Kvist
Face-to-face
The material i available om Moodle.
Self-study course.
Oral and written exam.
European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is used for the assessment of knowledge of Finnish and other national languages. Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate
satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicate good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (the grade
1) the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.
https://www.oph.fi/sv/utbildning-och-examina/nivaskalan-sprakkunskap-och-sprakutveckling#48ac3886
English
01.03.2023 - 26.11.2023
28.11.2022 - 30.04.2023
Anita Kvist
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Oral and written exam.
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
Quantitative methods: the following literature is recommended: Denise F. Polit & Cheryl Tatano Beck. 2008. Nursing Research. Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluver., as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
Lectures, exercises, independent work
Based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.
English
30.01.2023 - 02.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 22.01.2023
Ralf Lillbacka
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
The written assignment must be submitted before the final course date.
1cr = 27h
2cr = 54h
The student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.
Notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.
The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.
The student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.
Åsa Lågland
Face-to-face
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 21,23-25; 537 - 545, 588 - 730.
Responses to Altered Urinary Eliminations:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 26-28; 731 - 823 and Chapter 48: p 1657-1672 (from testicular torsion - prostate cancer)
Responses to altered Endocrine Function
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff,G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Chapter 18, 19, 20
Berman, A., Snyder, S., Frandsen, G., & Kozier, B. (2016). Kozier & Erb’s Fundamentals of Nursing, Global Edition: Vol. Tenth edition, Global edition. Pearson. UNIT 3 The Nursing Process
Contact teaching at Novia: lectures, case studies, workshops and physical assessment practice ( mandatory )
English
03.02.2023 - 04.06.2023
01.12.2022 - 30.03.2023
Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Written exam
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
CVD references
Alexander, MF., Fawcett, JN., Runciman, PJ. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. 2012: pp. 7-72.
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. 2011: 867-1014.
Thaler, MS- The Only EKG Book You’ll Ever Need. The 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015 (you can use the previous additions as well)
Hematology:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2011. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 33; 1068 - 1117.
Alexander, M., Fawcett, J. & Runciman, P. 2012. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. Ch 11, 479 - 523.
Lectures, work shops, simulations, discussion and individual/group work
Grade 0-5
English
05.02.2023 - 16.04.2023
01.12.2022 - 31.01.2023
10 - 35
Tiia Finne, Irén Vikström-Dahl
Compulsory attendance at workshops, simulations and seminars
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
re-take
Written examination
Participation in workshops and simualtions
Assignments
1 ECTS=27 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 38-40; 1219 - 1329.
Responses to Altered Respiratory Function:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 34-37; 1066 - 1217.
Responses to Altered Neurological Function
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 41, 42, 44
Lectures, demonstration, workshops, assignments
Compulsory attendance at workshops at Campus
0 - 5
English
12.04.2023 - 12.06.2023
01.12.2022 - 11.04.2023
Nina Vestö, Pia Nygårdas
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Written examination, assignments
Spring 2023
5 x 27 h = 135 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Clinical laboratory work
Pendergraph, G E & Pender graph, C B. Latest edition. Handbook of Phlebotomy and Patient Service Techniques
Miller, M. Latest edition. Specimen Managemant in Clinical Microbiology
Provan, D.(Edit). Latest edition or 2010. Oxford Handbook of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation.
Fischbach, F. Latest edition. A manual of Laboratory & Diagnostic Tests.Pendergraph, G E & Pender graph, C B. Latest edition. Handbook of Phlebotomy and Patient Service Techniques
Miller, M. Latest edition. Specimen Managemant in Clinical Microbiology
LeMone, P., Burke, K. & Bauldoff, G. (2011). Medical-Surgical Nursing Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 5 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey.
Berman. A. & Snyder. S. (2012). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. 9th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis
Iivanainen, A., & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirja. SanomaPro oy. Helsinki.
Meeker, M.H. & Rothrock, J.C (1999). Alexander´s Care of the Patient in Surgery. 11th Ed. Mosby, Inc.
Terveysportti
Material in Moodle
Clinical training i class, practical exercises
Case-studies
Movies
Discussions
Compulsory attendance during clinical training in class
English
03.10.2022 - 11.12.2022
15.06.2022 - 26.09.2022
Mikaela Engvall, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Face-to-face
Information on Moodle
The student
- Has basic understanding in oral and written Swedish
- Is familiar with the main structures of the language and has acquired a basic vocabulary
- Can use Swedish in everyday situations
During the course we will focus on:
- Oral and written exercises
- Swedish everyday vocabulary
- Reading and listening comprehensions
- Grammar/language structures
- Exams
Grade: pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).
English
07.01.2023 - 31.03.2023
01.12.2022 - 29.01.2023
0 - 25
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
-
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Oral and written exams
Short essay
Individual oral assignment
-
Oral and written exam at the end of the course.
-
3 x 27 h = 81 hours
-
Face-to-face
Information on Moodle
The student
- Has basic understanding in oral and written Swedish
- Is familiar with the main structures of the language and has acquired a basic vocabulary
- Can use Swedish in everyday situations
During the course we will focus on:
- Oral and written exercises
- Swedish everyday vocabulary
- Reading and listening comprehensions
- Grammar/language structures
- Exams
Grade: pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).
English
30.01.2023 - 05.06.2023
01.12.2022 - 29.01.2023
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
-
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Oral and written exams
Short essay
Individual oral assignment
-
Oral and written exam at the end of the course.
-
3 x 27 h = 81 hours
-
Face-to-face
English
12.09.2022 - 27.11.2022
31.12.2022 - 29.01.2023
Tanja Myntti
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Rika Levy-Malmberg
60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning
Alligood, M.R. ed. 2018. Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (2014 version is available as e-book)
Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book) chapters 1-3,7-9,12,13, 25 ,28, 30, 34, 38.
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
eller
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2018. Essentials of nursing research. appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.) . Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Lectures, discussions, seminars
Methods and basis for evaluation:
Nursing theory 1 cr
Written exam 2cr
Criteria for the theory evaluation:
Motivation of choice 1 point
Background of theorist 2 p
Where did the theorist find inspiration 1 p
How was the theory created/generated 1 p
Description of the theory 10 p
Concepts/phenomena 4 p
Relations within the theory 1 p
Assumptions, hypothesis, premises 1 p
Level of theory 1 p
How is the theory used 2 p
Criteria for evaluation of the theory 2 p
Conclusions what did you learn from the theory, how could you use this theory in practice and in your thesis 2 p
PP layout 1 p
Other material: pictures, books, instruments etc 2 p
Presentation, prepared 2 p
Comments 2 p
References 2 p
max 10 slides 1 p
Handed in on time 1 p
Followed instructions 1 p
Total points 40
Written exam 50%= grade 1
English
01.12.2022 - 05.03.2023
15.06.2022 - 20.11.2022
Rika Levy-Malmberg
The theory chosen in the assignment can be used in the thesis.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
2 credits
H-5
Validation according to general instructions on validation in Novia
Time table for examination:
Typer of axamination is given during introduction lecture
Possibility to two retakes on two later dates
Presentation on seminar
6x2h= 12 lectures, individual presentation,
seminars 4h per student in two groups (8h all together)
2h online exam
63 h own work, reading, doing assignment, preparing for seminar and online exam
1 cr=27h, 3cr= 81h work for students
Rika Levy-Malmberg
80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning
På engelska
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book)
Finnish national board on research integrity (Tenk). 2012. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Available at: https://www.tenk.fi/en
O'Leary, Z. 2009. The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt
På svenska
På engelska
Validation according to general instructions for validation in Novia
3 smaller assignments during the course (see Moodle)
1) literature search, review
2) read in depth 1 thesis write a summary, reflect,
3) data collection, interview, will be used in RM04 as a data material, deadline 21st of March
Independent planning and writing of thesis work plan
Presentation in individual or small group seminars
English
20.02.2023 - 14.05.2023
01.12.2022 - 19.02.2023
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
1 credits
H-5
Accepted thesis plan, indivudual or smal lgroup presentations during April-May, students book with teacher, when they are ready.
See also practical guide.
På engelska
fail, pass
Compulsory content:
Thesis title page
Table of content
Introduction (1page)
Background (description of subject/topic) (3-5pages)
(introduction and background should include at least 6-8 references of which 5 are scientific)
Aim
Method (data collection method based on 2 references/discuss method of selection) (2-3 pages)
Ethical considerations (based on references) (1 page)
Time table
Reference list
Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excluding title page, table of content and reference list)
See also practical guide
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
English
02.10.2023 - 17.12.2023
02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning
Berman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen, G. 2016. (10nd ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Hess, C. 2013. Clinical guide to Skin & Wound Care. 7th Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins.
Lectures
Clinical practice in class + independent training
Demonstration
Seminars
Pass/fail
English
25.09.2023 - 11.02.2024
02.09.2023 - 01.10.2023
Bioanalytik 2, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
1 credits
H-5
Exame
Practice in class: pass or fail
Approved assignments
4 x 27 h = 108
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars
Clinical Practice 40h / week in six weeks.
Mandatory attendance 100%
mandatory attendace at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments
English
14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023
15.05.2023 - 13.08.2023
Jannica Andtfolk, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or tto find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
Read instructions in Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
40 h/week during clinical training
6 weeks of practice
See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.
The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
Can be responsible for safe drug handling
Can use HaiPro
Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
patients and relatives
Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
cultural affiliation
Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
nursing context
Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
professional secrecy
https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.pdf
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care.
This practice can be validated.
But before you can validate you need to have done at least two of theses courses:
Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 3
Paediatrics, Maternity and Adult Nursing Care
Mental - Home and Rehabilitative Nursing Care
Passed/Fail
English
15.08.2023 - 26.12.2023
15.07.2023 - 13.08.2023
Jannica Andtfolk
At least two of theses courses:
Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 3
Paediatrics, Maternity and Adult Nursing Care
Mental - Home and Rehabilitative Nursing Care
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Spring- Autumn 2023
1 credit 27 h
6 credits 162h
Clinical training 40 h/week for 4 weeks = 160h
(38 h at the practice place and 2 hours for assignments).
2 hours INFO
See moodle for valuation.
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning
Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Austin, M., Crawford, R., Klaassen, B. & Armstrong, V. J. (2016). First aid manual: The authorised manual of St John Ambulance, St Andrew's First Aid and the British Red Cross (Revised 10th edition.). Dorling Kindersley.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.
Moodle: Teachers notes
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA
Contact-teaching at Novia. Lectures. Practical training in class, demonstration, workshops, compulsory attendance
First Aid compulsory attendance
Pass/fail
English
04.09.2023 - 22.10.2023
02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
After completed course in First Aid 1 and First Aid 2 you can bye an electronic First Aid card (Red Cross). Costs 13 euro/card
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
1 credits
H-5
Basic Nursing;
Exam, practical training
First Aid;
Short theoretical test during lessons, group assignment
90 % correct compressions (CPR) time: 2 minutes
Exam
4x27h
Marica Hinders
Face-to-face
National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
D’Onofrio,G., Greco, A. & Sancarlo, D. 2018. Gerontology.
Palermo, S. 2021. Frailty in the Elderly: Understanding and Managing Complexity
Ferraro, K., Janet M. Wilmoth, J. 2013 Gerontology : Perspectives and Issues, Fourth Edition
Mars, L. 2020. Dementia. Handbook and Resource Guide. Grey House Publishing
Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment
Lectures
Groupwork
Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
English
21.08.2023 - 05.11.2023
02.12.2023 - 31.12.2023
Marica Hinders
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Written assignments in groups and pair work submitted
Online exam (Geriatrics)
Seminar and introduction: obligatory
Retake: dates on Moodle
1c = 27h
5c= 135h
Lectures (14,5h), at Campus
Individiual studies and group work.(117,5 h)
Seminar (3h) at Campus
The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Marica Hinders
Face-to-face
Stanley, D. 2016. Clinical Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare. Values into Action.
+ recommended literature at Moodle
Compulsory introduction and seminar
Lectures
Group work
Case studies
Self study
Case study for the part of occupational safety, evaluated 0-5
Home test for the part of leading, managing and delegating in nursing care, evaluated 0-5
Discussion assignment fail/pass
English
02.10.2023 - 10.12.2023
02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023
Camilla Mattjus, Marica Hinders
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Case study
Online exam
Group work
1 cr = 27h
4 cr= 108 Cr
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Rika Levy-Malmberg
80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning
Alligood, M.R. ed. 2018. Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (2014 version is available as e-book)
Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book) chapters 1-3,7-9,12,13, 25 ,28, 30, 34, 38.
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
eller
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2018. Essentials of nursing research. appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.) . Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Lectures, discussions, seminars
fail, pass
English
09.10.2023 - 28.01.2024
09.09.2023 - 08.10.2023
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
1 credits
H-5
Validation according to general instructions on validation in Novia
Time table for examination:
Time of examination is given during introduction lecture
Possibility to two retakes on two later dates
Presentation on seminar
6x4h= 24 lectures, individual presentation, The theory chosen in the assignment can be used in the thesis.
8 h participation in conference
seminars 4h per student in 3 groups (12h all together)
2h exam
63 h own work, reading, doing assignment, preparing for seminar and online exam
1 cr=27h, 5cr= 153h work for students
Marica Hinders
Face-to-face
Faull, C.& Blankley, K. 2015. Palliative Care. Oxford University Press, Incorporated
Abraham, J., Gulley, J. 2019. The Bethesda Handbook of Clinical Oncology. Volters Cluwer.
Dark,G. 2013. Oncology at a Glance. Wiley-Blackwell.
+ Recommended literature at Moodle
Lectures
Work shop- Escape game
Group work
Exam
Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.
English
05.09.2023 - 20.11.2023
23.12.2023 - 21.01.2024
Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Introduction, compulsory
Palliative care Escape game, compulsory
Seminar, compulsory
1sp= 27h
3cr= 82h
Marica Hinders
Face-to-face
Presented on the moodle page
Lectures, Group assignment, individual online exam
Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
English
11.09.2023 - 29.10.2023
02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023
Marica Hinders
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Written assignments
Online test
1c=27h
3c=81h
Lectures (9h), at Campus
Individual studies (67) Individiual studies and group work.
Seminar (5h). at Campus
The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle
Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts
The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,
The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
Makes versatile use of literature
Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically
Marica Hinders
Face-to-face
Presented in Moodle
Written assignments
Discussions
Online exam
Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
English
10.09.2023 - 30.12.2023
11.08.2023 - 09.09.2023
Marica Hinders
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Group work
Individual assignments and exam
1credit=27h
4 credits = 108h
The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle
Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts
The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,
The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
Makes versatile use of literature
Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
The assigned nursing homes webpages and information given by the nursing homes
Terveysportti
Litterature related to the patient care in the nursing home
Plan for Clinical studies NU22CN01
See Moodle for instructions and information
Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
Patient safety/THL 1 cu
Pass/fail
See separate framework for evaluation
English
18.08.2023 - 28.09.2023
24.03.2023 - 23.04.2023
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Anita Kvist, Nina Vestö
Compulsory attendance.
No days can be counted of for sick leave or participation in other courses or exams
The student must follow the rules and routines in the nursing home.
It is the student responsibility to be in contact with the supervising teacher to schedule meetings for supervision and evaluation.
Practice assignment and time schedule is handed in during the practice seminar.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
See schema.novia.fi for practice information, practice seminar.
The supervision/evaluation during the practice will be scheduled individually
The student must do 40 hours/week clinical training.
4 weeks = 160 hours clinical training
8 hours is counted for practice information and practice seminar
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
Patient safety/THL 1 cu
Approved/Rejected
English
06.11.2023 - 10.12.2023
02.12.2023 - 31.12.2023
Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Approved/Rejected
PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
Swedish Level A1 or Finnish Level A1
Drug therapy and Pharmacology 1
First Aid and Basic Nursing
Clinical Nursing 1
Clinical practice 40 h/week for 5 weeks. (38h/ week at the practice place and 2 h/ week for assignments)
Approved assignments and seminars
THL-online course for 1 credit (27h) Read by your own and make a test, you need to pass it.
1 credit 27h total 9 credits 243h
Practice 40h x 5 weeks = 200h
Thl test 1 27h
Information (MANDATORY) 3 h
Seminarday (MANDATORY) 5 h
Handing in your assignments 8 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
English
21.08.2023 - 01.10.2023
02.12.2022 - 31.05.2023
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Rika Levy-Malmberg
90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning
See courses on methodology and ethical documents in Moodle course for thesis.
Also see Moodle course TH02
Students independent work and presentation of thesis with the help of supervision
0-5
English
30.08.2023 - 30.06.2024
02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023
Sirkku Säätelä, Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
1 credits
H-5
Presentation of thesis and maturity exam in May or November
Opposition of another student's work
Cooperation with the field if the thesis is a project ordered from a health care organization.
Presentation and maturity exam w. 50
or spring week 7 or 20
Students independently plan their work and include time for supervision, using/following the practical guide for thesis writing.
Grade 0
FRAUD AND IRREGULARITIES ALWAYS GENERATE A FAILED GRADE REGARDLESS OF GREAT ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE THESIS
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the study are irrelevant and source criticism is missing.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
The work is not systematic and the language is commonplace and inexact.
The understanding of the text is at stake due to language and grammatical mistakes.
The text is neither clear nor logical, and is not credible, for example, in the result.
METHOD
The choice of methodology is not described or is poorly described and irrelevant.
The correlation between the method description and the realisation of the thesis is very poor.
The ethical discussion is irrelevant or missing.
The thesis is not comprehensive enough according to standards for a thesis.
The conclusions are illogical and are not drawn on an analysis of the data material.
RESULTS
The presentation of the results is insufficient/ incorrect/ not based on the analysis of the data material.
There is no logical structure and the analysis/ reflective discussion is uncritical and shallow.
THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
The summary of the thesis is poorly written (abstract).
The introduction is not linked to the content of the thesis, the aim is not clear and the research questions are not in accordance with the aim.
Unstructured layout and incorrect reference list.
The presentation is unstructured, unprepared and irrelevant.
The opposition of the thesis is irrelevant and based on personal opinions.
Immature and dependent work process.
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
grade 1
The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis are based on few sources and the description is general or brief.
Sources are referred to in an unreflective way.
Some source criticism can be found in the text.
grade 2
The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis are based on mainly relevant literature but remain very general or briefly described.
The sources are few, only partially relevant and form a weak theoretical background for the thesis.
The ability to present an overview of relevant research is weak.
The source criticism is inadequate.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
grade1
The language is commonplace, throughout the work and the terminology is unclear or inexact.
Popular science sources are frequently used and it is not possible to know if the difference between scientific sources and popular science is understood.
The source paths are not clear.
På engelska
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
grade 3
There is a basic ability to synthesize and the theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis form a functioning theoretical whole for the thesis.
The literature is relevant regarding the topic, and the theoretical framework is relevant.
Good source criticism.
grade 4
The study has a good theoretical foundation based on extensive and relevant literature and a clear and adequate theoretical framework.
Very good source criticism.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
grade 3
The use of language is mainly correct and shows a basic understanding of writing scientific text.
Some shortcomings related to use of terminology and construction of sentences occur (for example, writing about yourself in third-person singular).
The search paths for used sources are clear and the referencing is correct.
grade 4
Correct use of language shows understanding of search paths and use of scientific text, even if some small mistakes occur. Can clearly distinguish between popular science and scientific text and use of different types of sources.
The text is credible and exact.
METHOD
grade 3
The method description gives a good picture of the realisation of the study, however missing in-depth discussion on different choices of methods.
The study is corresponding to the scope of a thesis and is carried out well.
The ethical discussion is short but declare relevant ethical issues.
The critical review is extensive but not reflective.
The conclusions are legitimate and reflect the aim, but the ability for argumentation is missing.
grade 4
The description of method gives a comprehensive picture of the realisation of the study and shows awareness of advantages and disadvantages concerning the choice of methods.
The ethical discussion is extensive and complete regarding relevant ethical issues.
The conclusions are comprehensive and well founded.
RESULTS
grade 3
The data material is big enough for analysis and the presentation of the results is systematic and follows the described process, but the reasoning is tentative and mainly referring.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear, but brief and undeveloped, the refection is missing.
grade 4
The data material is rich and the analysis follows the description and is well implemented.
The presentation of results is correct and shows the ability for independent reasoning.
The presentation of results follows the described process, which renders transparent results.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear and extensive and demonstrates strengths and weaknesses in the realisation.
THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
grade 3
The summary of the study is well written.
The introduction gives the reader a good enough picture to understand the topic and aim of the study.
The aim and the research questions are logically connected.
Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
The presentation and the opposition according to the instructions.
The work process has been smooth and mainly independent.
grade 4
The summary of the study is very well written.
The introduction gives a clear background to how the work relates to previous research and thus the aim of the thesis. The aim and the research questions are logically interconnected.
Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
The presentation is systematic and an ability to develop and clarify the topic is present.
The opposition is critical and constructive and show the ability to familiarise with the opposed work.
The work process is mature and mainly independent.
Grade 5
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
The background and the starting point are very well founded and well described and show an ability to understand the topic from different perspectives.
A reflecting approach to the topic is present in the work. The theoretical framework is well chosen and there is an ability to evaluate its merits and limitations.
The sources are comprehensive and relevant, and show an excellent ability for source criticism.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
Scientific language is used throughout the thesis and the text is clear and distinct and gives an impression of accuracy and credibility.
The text is easy to read.
The use of references is correct.
METHOD
The description of method gives a comprehensive picture of the realisation of the study and shows the awareness of advantages and disadvantages concerning the choice of methods, and the ability to consider different alternatives.
The ethical discussion is extensive and complete regarding relevant ethical issues.
The conclusions are comprehensive and well founded and there is an ability of critical evaluation. An ability to show new perspectives and questions for further research.
RESULTS
The data material is rich and the analysis is transparent and excellently done.
The presentation of results is well-structured, innovative, original, and shows an ability for independent reasoning.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear and comprehensive.
Strengths and weaknesses in the realisation of the study are discussed.
The work finishes with an attractive ending, well-founded synthesis and possibilities for development.
THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
The summary of the study is outstanding.
The introduction problematises previous research and knowledge of the topic and thus place the aim in a scientifically interesting context
The aim and the research questions are logically interconnected.
Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
The presentation is systematic and an ability to develop and clarify the topic is present.
The opposition is critical and constructive and show an excellent ability to problematise and reflect critically on the topic.
The work process is flexible, mature and independent.
The work goes the extra mile that shows luminescence.