Academic year 2022 - 2023

•   Basic nursing care RBA22VG02-3002 19.09.2022-04.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
  - are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
  - are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing methods
  Ergonomics in the work
  Aseptic manners
  Nursing process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Anttila K, Kaila-Mattila T, Kan S, Puska E-L & Vihunen R. 2004. Vård och välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen. Tammerfors
  
  Iivanainen A & Syväoja, P 2012. ,Hoida ja Kirjaa. SanomaPro (valda delar)
  
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  ww.vardhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning
  Individuella arbeten
  Kliniska övningar på KTC ( obligatorisk närvaro)
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 04.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 18.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology RAD22GV04-3001 19.09.2022-20.11.2022  4 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Penttinen, Ulla. Kurskompendium på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, kunskapsverkstäder, självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 20.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 19.09.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras genom två deltenter och ett skriftligt arbete
  
  Kurstentamina:
  vecka 43
  vecka 45
  
  Omtentamina
  2022:
  25.11
  9.12
  
  2023:
  20.1
  10.2 (not translated)

•   Clinical nursing care RB20VG04-3001 12.09.2022-06.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  -have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
  -have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

  Prerequisites

  Basic nursing care
  Clinical basic nursing care internship

  Content of the study unit

  Internal medical illnesses
  Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
  Emergency care and intensive care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  INREMEDICIN och KIRURGISK VÅRD
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  Kapitel 7. Omvårdnad vid hjärtsjukdomar.
  Kapitel 8. Omvårdnad vid cirkulationssvikt.
  Kapitel 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen
  Kapitel: omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 17. Omvårdnad vid diabetes mellitus
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten
  Kapitel 25. Klinisk omvårdnad vid stroke
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle och annat som anges under lektionerna
  
  AKUT och INTENSIVVÅRD
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur, AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  Aktuell forskning inom akut och intensivvård. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, Group work, Individual work, Videos, Simulation exercises,

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Deltagit i föreläsningarna
  Deltagit i iv-kanylering, praktiska övningar
  Godkänd News test
  Individuell/parvis inlämningsuppgift: GK/UK
  Godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 06.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 12.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  INTENSIVVÅRD
  Individuell/paruppgift inlämnas via moodle
  
  INREMEDICIN OCH KIRURGISK VÅRD
  Skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp. Totalt 81 h
  INREMEDICIN OCH KIRURGISK VÅRD 2 sp
  Teori 4h + 4h + 3 h =
  Teori 3 h
  Studier på egen hand 17 h
  
  AKUTVÅRD 0,5 sp
  Teori 4 h
  NEWS test (nätbaserad) 1 h
  
  INTENSIVVÅRD 0,5 sp
  4 h
  Iv-kanylering övningar 4 h/ studerande
  Gemensam tentamen: 2 h
  
  Närstudier: 15 h
  Studier på egen hand: ca 25 h
  Totalt: 81 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen
  kan räkna upp och beskriva endast med litteraturens ord (utantill läsning),
  har ytlig kunskap i ämnet och förståelsen är bristfällig men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig substanskunskap. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen
  kan redogöra för ämnet utan att använda endast litteraturens ord
  förstår det mesta av ämnet
  har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  kan ge en del egna exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen
  har fördjupad kunskap i ämnet
  kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  kommer med egna goda exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt). (not translated)

•   Clinical physics and radiation biology RAD22ST02-3001 26.08.2022-31.12.2022  4 credits  (URS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has basic understanding in electricity and good insight into radiation in order to apply knowledge in future courses using different types of methods and thus different types of radiation
  - understands the interaction of radiation with matter, has insight into the effects of radiation on humans and the radiation sensitivity of different organs and tissues

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to clinical radiography and radiotherapy

  Content of the study unit

  -basic physics
  -radiation biology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to the lecturer

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, workshop

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anders Skjäl, Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  Radiation physics 27h x= 54h
  Radiation biology 27h x= 54h

•   Clinical radiography 1 RAD22KSR01-3001 10.04.2023-28.05.2023  13 credits  (URS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common conventional x-ray examinations under supervision
  - has the ability to act as a caretaker in ultrasound and biopsies, punctures
  - can plan, perform and evaluate dental examinations
  - can apply an aseptic way of working
  - has basic insights into the patient's overall care and can apply theoretical knowledge in diagnostic radiography
  - understands and works in accordance with principles for safe and safe patient care

  Prerequisites

  Diagnostic radiography 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Conventional examinations
  US
  Dental examinations

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Olika atlas om projektioner för nativröntgen, bl.a
  Pocket Atlas of Radiographic Positioning , T.B. Moeller och E.Reif (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kliniska övningar/KTC och VCS
  Klinisk praktik (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.04.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 09.04.2023

  • 13 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända övningar och kliniskt test, godkänd praktik och övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  38t/vecka (not translated)

•   Clinical radiography 4 RA20KSR04-3001 14.11.2022-16.04.2023  17 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice
  - has the ability to independently, as a member of the work team, plan, perform and evaluate nativity studies and easier MRI and angiography examinations
  - can handle, care and treat the patient overall in examinations and interventions and have good readiness to care for patients at different situations / different circumstances / with varying needs and problems.
  - understands the meaning of patient-centered and safe patient care
  - familiar with the care of other types of departments than their own
  - can apply the principles of sustainable development in all dimensions and have developed the ability to collaborate and demonstrate responsibility in work with increased demands for independence and initiative
  - has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in the diagnostic radiography's sub-areas.

  Prerequisites

  Diagnostic radiography 4, Clinical radiography 2 and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient care in clinical radiography context and in Biosciences

  Content of the study unit

  Conventional examinations
  MRI
  Angiography

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.11.2022 - 16.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 13.11.2022

  • 17 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical radiotherapy RA18KSR05-3002 14.11.2022-16.04.2023  10 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in radiotherapy and have the ability to plan, implement and evaluate radiotherapy under supervision
  - has the ability and ability to respond, care and support the cancer patient and his relatives
  - has insight into the importance of the care chain for the overall care of the cancer patient and has developed the ability to cooperate and shows responsibility in his work
  - has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in therapeutic radiography

  Prerequisites

  Therapeutical radiography, Clinical radiography and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient in clinical radiography context and in Biosciences

  Content of the study unit

  Radiotherapy

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.11.2022 - 16.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 13.11.2022

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Diagnostic radiography 1 RAD22ST03-3001 10.10.2022-02.04.2023  7 credits  (URS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understand the operating principles of X-ray tubes and generator, the origin of X-rays and have thorough insights into imaging techniques and the use of X-ray apparatus for conventional examinations
  - has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
  - conducts basic projection learning and can be the basic principles for planning, performing and evaluating nativity studies
  - has basic knowledge of pathological findings.
  - has basic knowledge of ultrasound technology and is familiar with various surveys; preparation, implementation and aftercare.
  - has good insights into different types of X-ray equipment for examining the theet and jaws.
  - can apply an aseptic way of working and have knowledge of infectious diseases and insulation principles
  - understands the importance of good patient experience and safe patient care
  - can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to clinical radiography

  Content of the study unit

  -x-ray tubes and generators
  -imaging techniques for conventinal examinations
  -anatomy
  -basics in projection learning and criteria for good x-ray examination
  -Ultrasound
  -x-rays of theeth
  -Aseptic and infectious diseases
  -Ethics

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, övningar, diskussioner (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.10.2022 - 02.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 09.10.2022

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Vid kursstarten diskussion angående utvärderingsmetoder (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27t/sp (not translated)

•   English RBA22EN01-3001 02.01.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international context

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 12.02.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  Active participation is required.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Finnish RBA22FI01-3001 09.01.2023-26.02.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 04.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   First aid RBA22VG01-3001 16.01.2023-19.02.2023  2 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
  - are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Health care in case of emergency

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.01.2023 - 19.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 16.01.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp=27h (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy 1 RBA22BV01-3003 26.09.2022-25.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology
  Cells, tissues, integumentary system
  Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
  Support- and movement organs

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 25.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 25.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 23rd of November 2022
  Re-examination 2nd of February and 31st of March 2023

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 22 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 59 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy 2 RBA22BV02-3001 30.01.2023-19.03.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and physiology 1

  Content of the study unit

  The circulatory system
  The lymphatic system
  The respiratory system
  The digestive and secretory organs
  The kidneys and urinary tracts
  Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.01.2023 - 19.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 03.02.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 17th of March 2023
  Re-examination x and x 2023

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr corresponds to 27 hours work for the student
  Lectures and examination 23 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 58 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication RBA22IN01-3002 29.08.2022-20.11.2022  4 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Swedish 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbeten.
  Material på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test ( library/ informationservice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kommunikation
  
  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat.
  Förkunskapskrav
  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 20.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 19.12.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Anita Kvist, Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kommunikation: Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen.
  Introduktion: On-line tent i informationssökning samt i inroduktionskursens material (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:Underkänd
  Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
  Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kommunikation:
  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
  • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
  • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
  • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)

•   Introduction to clinical radiography RAD22ST01-3001 29.08.2022-02.11.2022  6 credits  (URS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The stundent
  -is familiar with the history of radiography and radiotherapy
  -has a knowledge about different modalities in diagnostic and therapeutic radiography and about radioggrahers profession.
  -has a knowledge about basic words and concepts
  - is familiar with the research field in clinical radiography
  - can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
  - has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
  - has basic skills in interprofessional work
  - understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
  - understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
  - is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  - Radiation
  - Modalities in radiography, radiotherapy, nuclearmedicin
  - Radiographer education
  - The radiographer profession and their workfield
  - Clinical radiography research
  - Health care in Finland
  - Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
  - General laws in social and health care
  - Interprofessional work
  - The client's / patient's position and rights
  - Ethical guidelines and codes
  - Professional encounters
  - Internal sustainability in the profession

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to the lecturer

  Learning methods

  Lecturers, workshops, study visits

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 02.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam
  Individual written assignment

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h x 6= 162h

•   Leadership, Workplace Culture and Service Design RB20FU03-3002 01.01.2023-26.05.2023  4 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
  - have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
  - are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
  - fundamental insights into entrepreneurship

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Organizational activities and leadership
  Entrepreneurship

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Rosengren, K. 2014. Vårdledarskap: att utveckla och förbättra framtidens vård och omsorg. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Bolman, L. G., Deal, T. E., & Holmqvist, A. (2019). Nya perspektiv på organisation och ledarskap (Sjätte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  Wheelan Susan A., (2017) Att skapa effektiva team. Studentliteratur.
  Källerman Helena (2016) Uppdrag mellanchef. Liber

  Learning methods

  Online, self studies, individual work, groupwork

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 26.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 19.02.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp motsvarar 27h arbete. (not translated)

•   Practice: Basic clinical nursing care internship RAD22KSG01-3001 05.12.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (URS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has basic insights into clinical care and clinical care methods
  - has the ability to identify and meet the needs of the patient for basic care
  - has the ability to create a good patient relationship, can function responsibly and engage in patient care as well as realize the importance of collaboration.

  Prerequisites

  Basic nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Basic clinical nursing care internship

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd/underkänd
  
  Kriterierna finns i praktikdokumentet som vi går igenom vid introduction. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.12.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 22.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Introduction och semniariet obligatoriskt (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik på äldreboende. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Praktik 40h/vecka
  Obligatorisk närvaro 100 %
  Godkända uppgifter och seminarie (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända inlämningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp 27h
  3sp 81h
  
  2veckor praktik 40h/vecka = 80h (not translated)

•   Radiation safety RAD22ST04-3001 09.01.2023-26.03.2023  5 credits  (URS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of laws, regulations and directives regarding medical use of radiation and can apply them
  - understands the radiological hygiene work that the medical use of radiation requires and can work according to approved principles in the field.

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to clinical radiography

  Content of the study unit

  Radiation Protection Authorities (international / national)
  Radiation safety legislation, directive
  International and national recommendations
  Radiation safety
  Radiation doses
  Measurements

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Lagar och förordningar, föreskrifter, rapporter.
  Medicinsk fysik av E. Berglund och B-A. Jönsson, 2019.
  Radiologi av L. Blomqvist och S. Zackrisson,2022.
  Annat av föreläsaren angiven litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, övningar, kliniska övningar, övningsarbete (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.01.2023 - 26.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 14

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  27t/sp x 5= 135t (not translated)

•   Research Methodology RB20FU01-3001 19.09.2022-13.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
  - can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Science theory and evidence-based knowledge
  Research approaches
  Research process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures group discussion and assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 13.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group assignment and home test, the test on Moothe

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Based on the test on Moodle and group assignment graded as 0-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 3 cr. 1 cr=27 hours; 3 cr= 81 hours,

  Assessment criteria

  The students does not understand and can not apply the methods of qualitative research

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Notable weakness are found in students understanding and application on the research aims and questions or the data collection stage

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding and can apply qualitative concepts into the different research phases

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The students demonstrates a complete understanding for qualitative concepts of research and make only insignificant errors when applying and planing research

•   Research Methods RB20FU02-3001 19.09.2022-13.11.2022  4 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students
  - can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
  - can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
  - can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
  - can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
  - can make simple statistical calculations and tests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work

  Prerequisites

  Research methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Qualitative and quantitative research methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
  Qualitative methods:
  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
  qualitative methods: lectures and group discussion and assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.
  
  qualitative method: based on a home exam, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental concepts and understanding the research process and analysis approaches, is evaluated

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 19.09.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
  qualitative methods: written assignment and presentation (graded according to the scale 1-5)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Quantitative method: the assignment has to be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course
  
  qualitative method: group written assignment and presentation within a seminar

  Student's schedule and workload

  Quantitative research methodology is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours work of which 12 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.
  qualitative methods is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply the research process and analysis methods.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.
  
  qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of analysis methods and is not adequately preform content analysis

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply concepts analysis , and only minor errors are found in the analysis process.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding and makes only insignificant errors when applying the methods.

•   Therapeutic radiography RA18SA02-3002 12.09.2022-13.11.2022  7 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has basic insights into cancer diseases, epidemiology and treatment methods
  - recognizes the special features of the oncological care
  - controls the basic principles for the use of radiotherapy equipment and has good knowledge of radiotherapy as a cancer treatment
  - has good knowledge of the care of cancer patients and understands its special features
  - is familiar with the importance of safe patient care.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical radiography 2

  Content of the study unit

  Radiotherapy, equipment, treatment, workprocess, safe and good care for cancerpatients

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to the lecturer

  Learning methods

  Lecturers, study visits, workshops

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 12.09.2022

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Katarina Vironen, Radiografi och strålbehandling 1

  Additional information

  Tecnology: Bo Lind (0,3). Lecture 2 h
  Onkology: Heidi Bengts (0,4) Lecture 6 h in auditory and 1,5 h with the radiogrpaher group
  Doseplanning: Emil Strandback (0,3) 3 h / group
  Radiationtherapy clinical practice: Johanna Hernberg (2)
  Radiationtherapy theory: Katarina Vironen (4)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exams

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h x 7= 189h

•   Thesis, idea and framework RA16EX01-3002 11.01.2023-26.05.2023  2 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has the ability to produce an idea for his thesis and can perform and argue for choices she/he have done.

  Prerequisites

  Studymodule Researchprocess

  Content of the study unit

  Thesis idea
  The research process including presentation of an idea

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Lecturers, discussion, seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.01.2023 - 26.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.03.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation av godkänd plan för examensarbete (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig idéplan klar inom maj 2023
  Presentation av plan klar inom maj 2023
  Godkänd plan inom maj 2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h x 2= 54h

•   Thesis, plan and execution RA16EX02-3003 16.04.2023-28.05.2023  10 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student has capacity to independently write a thesis according to coellege rules. Can work systematic and purposefully according to scientific and ethical rules

  Prerequisites

  Studymodule Researchprocess

  Content of the study unit

  Thesis plan
  The research process including presentation of an plan

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Eget arbete
  Handledning (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.04.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 08.01.2023

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examensarbete, samt mognadsprov (not translated)

Academic year 2023 - 2024

•   Thesis, presentation and maturity test RA16EX03-3003 04.09.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

  Prerequisites

  Study module Research process

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of thesis and acting as opponent
  Maturity exam

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Eget arbete
  Seminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examensarbete bedöms med vitsordet 0-5
  Mognadsprov bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Katarina Vironen, Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examensarbete
  Godkänt mognadsprov (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hösten 2023, vecka (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)