Academic year 2022 - 2023

•   Basic nursing care RBA22VG02-3002 19.09.2022-04.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
  - are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
  - are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing methods
  Ergonomics in the work
  Aseptic manners
  Nursing process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Anttila K, Kaila-Mattila T, Kan S, Puska E-L & Vihunen R. 2004. Vård och välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen. Tammerfors
  
  Iivanainen A & Syväoja, P 2012. ,Hoida ja Kirjaa. SanomaPro (valda delar)
  
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  ww.vardhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning
  Individuella arbeten
  Kliniska övningar på KTC ( obligatorisk närvaro)
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 04.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 18.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

•   Biochemical Bioanalysis 3 BA16BA01-3003 02.01.2023-31.03.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have profound insights into biochemical bioanalysis.
  - are familiar with medication analysis, toxicological examinations and the determination of tumour markers, porphyrins, vitamines and tracers, and know the diseases connected to these examinations.
  - understand the role of laboratory results and result interpretation within biochemical bioanalytics.
  - command the terminology within clinical biochemistry.
  - are able to plan a clinical biochemical laboratory examination.
  - are familiar with the laboratory work process in its entirety, but also its phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
  - are able to use sources of information and scientific publications that are central to the field, concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within biochemical bioanalysis.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Biosciences

  Content of the study unit

  Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)
  Clinical toxicology
  Homones and brain-specific molecules
  Porphyrins, vitamins, minerals and trace elements
  Methodology: Mass spectrometry, NMR and enzymology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. Burtis, Burns. 7th or 8th ed. Elsevier
  Vetenskapliga artiklar
  Moodlesidans material (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Skriftliga arbeten (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända uppgifter
  Närvaro vid diskussioner (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 31.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifterna inlämnas senast 27.4.2023
  Kompletteringsuppgifter senast 20.5.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursen omfattar 81 h arbete. (not translated)

•   Biochemical Methodology BAA22KM03-3002 20.03.2023-17.11.2023  5 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the process of laboratory tests and biochemical methodology
  - can perform laboratory tests using different methods
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field.
  - have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work.
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

  Prerequisites

  The Basics of Bioanalysis

  Content of the study unit

  Biochemical tests using laboratory apparatus
  Near patient tests

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021), Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014), Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.
  Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (2014). Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U.
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, clinical practice in class / laboratory work, demonstrations, individual work, groupwork

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.03.2023 - 17.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  02.01.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practice in class: pass or fail
  Practical exam or movie making
  Approved assignments

  Content scheduling

  Innehåll:
  ABO- och Rh-bestämning, förenlighetstest, antikropps-screening
  Analys- och undersökningsmetoder
  Utförande av laboratorieundersökningar och användning av mindre och större instrument
   DiaMeds centrifug och inkubator
   Konelab kemianalysatorn
   EKG-apparat
   Spirometer-Alpha
   PEF-apparater
   Mindray automatisk cellräknare
   Premium-blodgasapparat
   Koagulometer ACL
   Urilux-S-urintestremseavläsare
   m fl (not translated)

•   Biochemistry BAA22BV07-3002 19.01.2023-20.03.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental insights into molecules that constitute living organisms
  - have fundamental insights into biochemical processes
  - master biochemical terminology
  - are familiar with the main sources of information related to biochemistry
  - understand the importance of biochemistry in regard to bioanalysis

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Biochemical processes
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nelson & Cox. Lehninger Principles of biochemistry. 8th edition. Macmillan 2021
  Bruce Alberts, Karen Hopkin, Alexander Johnson, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter. Essential Cell Biology 2019
  Erlanson-Albertsson & Gullberg. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
  Vetenskapliga publikationer (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Självstudier
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.01.2023 - 20.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 25.03.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Våren 2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 3 x 27 h (not translated)

•   Biomethodology 1 BAA22KM01-3001 28.11.2022-26.05.2024  4 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic knowledge and skills in microscopy and cell biological, immunological and histological methods.
  - command the basic settings of the microscope.
  - are able to carry out cell biological, immunological and histological laborations according to method descriptions.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in biosciences.
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory work.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the work.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Microscopy
  Cell biological, immunological and histological methods.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material finns på kursens moodlesida (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursen innehåller teori om biometodik och laborationer. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningen baserar sig på
  - godkänd Köhlerinställning och mikroskopering
  - godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.11.2022 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 27.11.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan inte tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifternas inlämningsdatum finns på kursmoodlen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande.
  Hösten 2022: Mikroskopi 1 sp
  Mikroskopilaborationer 20 h
  Uppgift 7 h (not translated)

•   Cell biology BAA22BV08-3001 10.10.2022-04.11.2022  2 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the structure and function of the cells.
  - are familiar with the function of the cell organelles.
  - are able to identify the cell organelles.
  - are familiar with cell splitting and cell death.
  - are familiar with human cells and embryology.
  - command terminology of cell biology.
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within cell biology.
  - understand the importance of cell biology within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Cells and cell organelles, structure and function
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteratur:
  Material på kursens moodlesida
  
  Cellbiologi. Charlotte Erlanson-Albertsson. Studentlitteratur (kort variant)
  Cellbiologi. Charlotte Erlanson-Albertsson och Urban Gullberg (lång variant)
  Heino & Vuento. Biokemian ja solubiologian perusteet. WSOY.
  Sadava, Heller, Orians, Purves, Hillis. Life. The Science of Biology. Freeman.
  Online Essentials of cell biology. https://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/essentials-of-cell-biology-14749010
  Alberts et al. Essential Cell Biology, 5th International Student Edition 2019 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner uppgifter på basen av vetenskapliga artiklar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningen baserar sig på godkänd uppgift och tentamen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.10.2022 - 04.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 09.10.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Bedömningen baserar sig på godkänd uppgift och tentamen.
  
  Terntamen 4.11.2022
  Omtentamen 9.12.2022 och 20.1.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 sp är 54 h arbete för studerande
  Artikeluppgiften beräknas ta 6 h
  Föreläsningarna 14 h
  Tentläsandet 34 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology 2 BAA22BV04-3003 16.01.2023-26.02.2023  2 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have knowledge of microbiology, immunology and pathology to be able to use relevant sources of information and scientific literature and to communicate with colleagues
  - acts appropriately in care situations
  - understands the principles of methodology, diagnostics and bioanalytics

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Carlson & Linder. Introduktion till mikrobiologi.
  Hedman et al. Mikrobiologia.
  Murray, Rosenthal & Pfaller. Medical Microbiology. 8th edition.
  https://www.elsevier.com/books/medical-microbiology/murray/978-0-323-29956-5
  Bok på nätet http://www.microbiologybook.org/book/bact-sta.htm
  Roitt’s Essential Immunology 13th Edition Peter J. Delves, Seamus J. Martin, Dennis R. Burton, Ivan M. Roitt
  Nätsidor & tidskrifter
  https://www.asm.org/
  http://jcm.asm.org/
  https://www.thl.fi/ttr/gen/rpt/statistiker.html (THL, register över smittsamma sjukdomar)
  https://thl.fi/web/infektiotaudit-ja-rokotukset/seurantajarjestelmat-ja-rekisterit/tartuntatautirekisteri/tartuntatautien-esiintyvyystilastot (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Fördjupning av klinisk mikrobiologi, immunologi och patologi genom
  
  Föreläsningar
  Självstudier
  Diskussioner
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0 - 5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 15.01.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inom våren 2023
  Tent 24.2
  Omtent i mars och april (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 sp = 2 x 27 h (not translated)

•   Clinical nursing care RB20VG04-3001 12.09.2022-06.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  -have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
  -have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

  Prerequisites

  Basic nursing care
  Clinical basic nursing care internship

  Content of the study unit

  Internal medical illnesses
  Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
  Emergency care and intensive care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  INREMEDICIN och KIRURGISK VÅRD
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  Kapitel 7. Omvårdnad vid hjärtsjukdomar.
  Kapitel 8. Omvårdnad vid cirkulationssvikt.
  Kapitel 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen
  Kapitel: omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 17. Omvårdnad vid diabetes mellitus
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten
  Kapitel 25. Klinisk omvårdnad vid stroke
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle och annat som anges under lektionerna
  
  AKUT och INTENSIVVÅRD
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur, AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  Aktuell forskning inom akut och intensivvård. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, Group work, Individual work, Videos, Simulation exercises,

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Deltagit i föreläsningarna
  Deltagit i iv-kanylering, praktiska övningar
  Godkänd News test
  Individuell/parvis inlämningsuppgift: GK/UK
  Godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 06.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 12.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  INTENSIVVÅRD
  Individuell/paruppgift inlämnas via moodle
  
  INREMEDICIN OCH KIRURGISK VÅRD
  Skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp. Totalt 81 h
  INREMEDICIN OCH KIRURGISK VÅRD 2 sp
  Teori 4h + 4h + 3 h =
  Teori 3 h
  Studier på egen hand 17 h
  
  AKUTVÅRD 0,5 sp
  Teori 4 h
  NEWS test (nätbaserad) 1 h
  
  INTENSIVVÅRD 0,5 sp
  4 h
  Iv-kanylering övningar 4 h/ studerande
  Gemensam tentamen: 2 h
  
  Närstudier: 15 h
  Studier på egen hand: ca 25 h
  Totalt: 81 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen
  kan räkna upp och beskriva endast med litteraturens ord (utantill läsning),
  har ytlig kunskap i ämnet och förståelsen är bristfällig men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig substanskunskap. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen
  kan redogöra för ämnet utan att använda endast litteraturens ord
  förstår det mesta av ämnet
  har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  kan ge en del egna exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen
  har fördjupad kunskap i ämnet
  kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  kommer med egna goda exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt). (not translated)

•   English RBA22EN01-3001 02.01.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international context

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 12.02.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  Active participation is required.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Finnish RBA22FI01-3001 09.01.2023-26.02.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård, sjukdomar, röntgenundersökningar och laboratorieprov. Sedan samtalar vi om texterna och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  
  Arbetsmetoder:
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning)
  Ordförhör
  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning 1-3 goda insikter, 4-5 goda insikter. Studerande får vitsord i såväl skriftlig som muntlig framställning.
  
  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 08.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar kursen i samband med kurstentamen. Tvåspråkiga läser materialet på egenhand. Mera info fås vid kursstarten. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar kursen i samband med kurstentamen. Tvåspråkiga läser materialet på egenhand. Mera info fås vid kursstarten. (not translated)

•   Finnish - Oral Skills YH10FI01-M-3101 09.01.2023-26.02.2023  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  10.12.2022 - 08.01.2023

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish - Writing Skills YH10FI01-S-3094 09.01.2023-26.02.2023  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  10.12.2022 - 08.01.2023

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   First aid RBA22VG01-3001 16.01.2023-19.02.2023  2 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
  - are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Health care in case of emergency

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.01.2023 - 19.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 16.01.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp=27h (not translated)

•   General and inorganic chemistry BAA22GM01-3001 29.08.2022-07.10.2022  2 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge of general and inorganic chemistry, as well as basic chemical concepts and nomenclature
  - master the basics of chemical reactions, chemical reaction rates and equilibrium, acids, bases, pH, pKa, pKb, the states of matter, the mole relations of gases and thermochemistry, redox reactions and electrochemistry

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  General and inorganic chemistry
  Basic chemical concepts and chemical reactions

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jatta Saarenheimo

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Anges på kursens moodlesida (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, egna uppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända uppgifter
  Godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 07.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 15.09.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jatta Saarenheimo

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Godkänd tentamen
  Godkända uppgifter enligt kursens moodlesida (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kurstentamen fredagen den 30.9 kl. 8.30.
  Omtentamen fredagen den 25.11.2022 och fredagen den 20.01.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Tentamen/uppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd prestation kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen
  har ytlig kunskap i allmän kemi men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet om än bristfällig
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig kunskap i allmän kemi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen
  kan redogöra och förstår det mesta av kursinnehållet
  har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  kan ge en del egna exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen
  har fördjupad kunskap i kursinnehållet
  kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  kommer med egna goda exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

•   Hematological Bioanalysis 1 BA14BI05-3003 14.02.2023-02.04.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  -are familiar with the examination and assessment of peripheral blood smears in connection to different factors that affect the blood cell morphology, and to different illnesses (anemias, infections, other benign conditions, myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative conditions, MDS and leukemias).
  -are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
  -are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Hematology
  Hematological methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Examination and assessment of normal and pathological peripheral blood smears

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore. USA.
  
  Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders. Missouri. USA.
  
  Hematovision, dataprogram (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, diskussion, mikroskopiering (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd tentamen, uppgifter (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.02.2023 - 02.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 13.02.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Syftet i kursen är att ge djupare insikter i bedömning av perifera blodutstryk i relation till olika faktorer som påverkar blodcellsmorfologin samt till olika sjukdomstillstånd.
  Kursen innehåller granskning och bedömning av perifera blodutstryk:
  - anemier, röda sidan
  - infektionsutstryk, övriga benigna tillstånd
  - myeloproliferativa tillstånd
  - lymfoproliferativa
  - Myelodysplastiskt syndrom MDS
  - leukemier (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Diff-tent 23.2.2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursen är 3 sp = 3 x 27 = 81 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har inte nått målen i kursen på grundläggande nivå som utgör 50 % av poäng i diff-tenten.
  Studerande känner inte igen blodcellerna och kan ange kriterierna för att korrket bedöma cellerna. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Hematology 1 BAA22BV10-3002 02.01.2023-10.02.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with human cells in the blood and the organs that produce blood (blood production - development and regulation.
  - have fundamental insights in laboratory tests and the examination process connected to it.
  - are familiar with the terminology of hematology.
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within hematology.
  - understand the importance of hematology within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Blood cells, blood-forming organs
  Lab tests
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.
  
  Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.
  
  Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.
  
  Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)
  
  O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.
  
  
  Hematovision, dataprogram (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, diskussion, mikroskopiering (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Skriftlig uppgift om hematopoes och cellernas utveckling, innehållande beskrivning av symtomer och de centrala laboratorieundersökningarna samt beskrivning av fyndernas kliniska betydelse.
  
  Tentamen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 10.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 15.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Syftet i kursen är att ge insikter i bedömning av perifera blodutstryk i relation till olika faktorer som påverkar blodcellsmorfologin samt till olika sjukdomstillstånd.
  
  Studeranden:
  - Kan hematopoesens teori och förstår kliniska betydelsen av olika blodkroppar.
  - Kan grundläggande hematologiska metoder manuellt samt kan använda apparatur.
  - Känner till preanalytiska faktorerna och kvalitetskriterierna gällande undersökningar.
  - Känner till normala morfologiska fynd i ett blodutstryk.
  - Känner till bioanalytikerns uppgifter vid benmärgsprovtagning och analys.
  
  Kursen innehåller granskning och bedömning av perifera blodutstryk. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  25h lektioner (i klass och distans) och
  56h självstudier, skrivande av uppgifter. (not translated)

•   Hematology 2 BAA22BV11-3002 01.05.2023-22.12.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
  - have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
  - understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Hemostaseology
  Immunhematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Finnish red cross Blood service https://www.bloodservice.fi/

  Learning methods

  Virtual course.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  Har insikter i koagulationsprocessen och blodtransfusionsläran.
  Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar och i undersökningsprocessen i relation till dessa.
  Är förtrogen med terminologin inom hemostas och immunhematologi.
  Känner till centrala informationskällor inom området.
  Förstår betydelsen av hemostas och immunhematologi inom bioanalytik. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.05.2023 - 22.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  04.04.2022 - 18.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2

  Additional information

  Innehåll:
  
  Trombocyter, plasmakoagulationsproteiner/faktorer och relation till blodkärlsskada, första tätning, betående tätning och fibrinolys.
  Blodgrupper och blodtransfusionskontroll.
  Laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
  
  Syftet i kursen är att studeranden:
  
  Har insikter i hemostasmekanismen/koagulationsprocessen.
  Har grundläggande insikter i blodgruppsserologi och transfusionsmedicin.
  Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
  Känner till de vanligaste sjukdomarnas prevention, diagnostisering och behandlingsformer inom kursens tyngdpunktsområden. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Histology and histotechnique BAA22BV09-3002 04.01.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the structure and characteristics of the different tissues.
  - are able to identify fundamental tissues in figures.
  - understand how the tissues influence the structure of the organs.
  -have basic knowledge in histotechniques
  - command terminology of histology and histotechnique.
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within histology and histotechnique
  - understand the importance of histology and histotechnique within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy & physiology 1

  Content of the study unit

  Tissues: structure, characteristics, influence
  Histotechnique, terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nastic & Wagner. Histologi. Studentlitteratur
  Mescher. Junqueira’s Basic Histology: Text and Atlas, Fifteenth Edition. Lange
  Websidor om histoteknik (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Självstudier
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0 - 5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 12.02.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Histoteknikdelen hör ihop med laborationerna och tenteras i maj 2023 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Histoteknikdelen hör ihop med laborationerna och tenteras i maj 2023
  Histologidelen kan studeras på egen hand och tenteras senast i maj 2023 (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy 1 RBA22BV01-3003 26.09.2022-25.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology
  Cells, tissues, integumentary system
  Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
  Support- and movement organs

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 25.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 25.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 23rd of November 2022
  Re-examination 2nd of February and 31st of March 2023

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 22 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 59 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy 2 RBA22BV02-3001 30.01.2023-19.03.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and physiology 1

  Content of the study unit

  The circulatory system
  The lymphatic system
  The respiratory system
  The digestive and secretory organs
  The kidneys and urinary tracts
  Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.01.2023 - 19.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 10.02.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 17th of March 2023
  Re-examination 21.04.2023 and 26.05.2023

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr corresponds to 27 hours work for the student
  Lectures and examination 23 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 58 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication RBA22IN01-3002 29.08.2022-20.11.2022  4 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Swedish 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbeten.
  Material på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test ( library/ informationservice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kommunikation
  
  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat.
  Förkunskapskrav
  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 20.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 19.12.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Anita Kvist, Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kommunikation: Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen.
  Introduktion: On-line tent i informationssökning samt i inroduktionskursens material (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:Underkänd
  Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
  Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kommunikation:
  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
  • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
  • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
  • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)

•   Laboratory Methodology BAA22ME01-3001 24.10.2022-04.06.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - master fundamental skills of laboratory work; laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
  - are able to use basic laboratory equipment
  - are able to work in the laboratory carefully and systematically based on method descriptions and safety regulations
  - have fundamental insights into qualitative and quantitative analyses
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
  - are able to calculate contents and manufacture solutions
  - have fundamental insights into organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography
  - consider occupational safety
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
  The use of basic laboratory equipment
  Organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Anges på kursmoodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Laborationer på TB
  Praktiskt laboratoriearbete och dokumentering (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända laborationer och uppgifter (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.10.2022 - 04.06.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 07.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan inte tenteras (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Besök till laboratorier kan ingå i kursen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända laborationer och uppgifter enligt kursens moodlesida (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande (not translated)

•   Leadership, Workplace Culture and Service Design RB20FU03-3002 01.01.2023-26.05.2023  4 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
  - have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
  - are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
  - fundamental insights into entrepreneurship

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Organizational activities and leadership
  Entrepreneurship

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Rosengren, K. 2014. Vårdledarskap: att utveckla och förbättra framtidens vård och omsorg. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Bolman, L. G., Deal, T. E., & Holmqvist, A. (2019). Nya perspektiv på organisation och ledarskap (Sjätte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  Wheelan Susan A., (2017) Att skapa effektiva team. Studentliteratur.
  Källerman Helena (2016) Uppdrag mellanchef. Liber

  Learning methods

  Online, self studies, individual work, groupwork

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 26.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 19.02.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp motsvarar 27h arbete. (not translated)

•   Molecular biological Bioanalysis BA18BI08-3002 16.01.2023-14.05.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with genetic disease, and the Finnish disease heritage
  - have insights into the analysis of genes and cells in relation to different organ diseases.
  - have profound knowledge about molecular biological methods
  - command the clinical terminology of molecular biology.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within molecular biological bioanalysis.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Cell biology
  Molecular Biology

  Content of the study unit

  Genetic disease
  The Finnish disease heritage
  Molecular biological methods
  Clinical terminology of molecular biology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Molekylärbiologisk bioanalytik. Kurskompendium. U Penttinen (tillgänglig på moodle)
  Genetiska sjukdomar. Magnus Nordenskjöld. Liber
  Perinnöllisyyslääketiede. Aula, Kääriäinen, Palotie. Duodecim
  Fundamentals of molecular diagnostics. David E. Bruns, Edward R. Ashwood, Carl A. Burtis
  Molekylärbiologi. Bränden. Studentlitteratur
  Human Genetics and Genomics. Taneri et al. Wiley-vch
  
  Open access books and articles:
  Genomes. Brown https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21128/
  Gene reviews https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1116/
  https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/8/2895
  https://www.hilarispublisher.com/
  
  Aktuella publikationer (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Skriftliga arbeten (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.01.2023 - 14.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 23.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftliga arbeten inlämnas senast 25.4.2023
  Kompletteringar inlämnas senast 20.5.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp innebär 3 x 27 h arbete för studerande (not translated)

•   Organic chemistry BAA22GM02-3001 03.10.2022-13.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge about organic chemistry, as well as chemical concepts and nomenclature
  - possess knowledge of functional groups and common organic compounds as well as organic reactions
  - have basic knowledge about alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, ethers, esters, amines and amides

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Organic chemistry
  Organic compounds and reactions
  Organic substances

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jatta Saarenheimo

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Se kursens moodlesida (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, egna uppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd tentamen och uppgifter (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2022 - 13.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 02.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jatta Saarenheimo

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kurstentamen hålls onsdagen den 28.10.2022 kl. 8.30
  Omtentamen fredagen den 20.01.2023 och 10.2.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h per sp, närmare beskrivning på kursens moodlesida (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften/tentamen uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd tentamen/uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen
  har ytlig kunskap i oragnisk kemi men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet om än bristfällig
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig kunskap i allmän kemi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen
  kan redogöra och förstår det mesta av kursinnehållet
  har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  kan ge en del egna exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen
  har fördjupad kunskap i kursinnehållet
  kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  kommer med egna goda exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

•   Research Methodology RB20FU01-3001 19.09.2022-13.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
  - can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Science theory and evidence-based knowledge
  Research approaches
  Research process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures group discussion and assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 13.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group assignment and home test, the test on Moothe

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Based on the test on Moodle and group assignment graded as 0-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 3 cr. 1 cr=27 hours; 3 cr= 81 hours,

  Assessment criteria

  The students does not understand and can not apply the methods of qualitative research

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Notable weakness are found in students understanding and application on the research aims and questions or the data collection stage

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding and can apply qualitative concepts into the different research phases

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The students demonstrates a complete understanding for qualitative concepts of research and make only insignificant errors when applying and planing research

•   Research Methods RB20FU02-3001 19.09.2022-13.11.2022  4 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students
  - can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
  - can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
  - can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
  - can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
  - can make simple statistical calculations and tests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work

  Prerequisites

  Research methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Qualitative and quantitative research methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
  Qualitative methods:
  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
  qualitative methods: lectures and group discussion and assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.
  
  qualitative method: based on a home exam, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental concepts and understanding the research process and analysis approaches, is evaluated

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 19.09.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
  qualitative methods: written assignment and presentation (graded according to the scale 1-5)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Quantitative method: the assignment has to be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course
  
  qualitative method: group written assignment and presentation within a seminar

  Student's schedule and workload

  Quantitative research methodology is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours work of which 12 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.
  qualitative methods is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply the research process and analysis methods.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.
  
  qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of analysis methods and is not adequately preform content analysis

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply concepts analysis , and only minor errors are found in the analysis process.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding and makes only insignificant errors when applying the methods.

•   Support Topics in Bioanalysis BA14ST01-3001 01.01.2023-15.04.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have the ability to independently find new information.
  - have the ability to acknowledge and analyze problems of the professional field in new situations.
  - are able to use their computer in their professional work.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Substance that supports the bioanalytical field

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bioanalytikerns yrke
  Preanalytik
  Sjukdomsdiagnostik
  
  
  2 sp EKG repetition, Lärare: Mikaela Engvall
  
  Persson, J., & Stagmo, M. (2017). Perssons kardiologi: Hjärtsjukdomar hos vuxna (8. painos.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  Mäkijärvi, M., Heikkilä, J., Piispa, S., Schmidt, H., & Hedman, A. (2003). EKG. Duodecim.
  
  Aktuellt inom bioanalytik (Ulla Penttinen)
  Nya undersökningar inom laboratoriediagnostiken
  Aktuella vetenskapliga publikationer (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Demonstrationer och övningar
  Fördjupning i vetenskaplig litteratur (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  2 sp EKG repetition, Lärare: Mikaela Engvall
  
  Studeranden visar förståelse för:
  - hjärtats elektrofysiologi
  - utförande av ett kvalitativt EKG
  - EKG-fynden
  - patientsäkerheten (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 15.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 20.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Ulla Penttinen

  Additional information

  2sp EKG repetition, Lärare: Mikaela Engvall
  
  HJÄRTATS ANATOMI OCH FYSIOLOGI
  Studeranden
  - Har grundläggande kunskaper om hjärtats anatomi och kan tillämpa kunskapen samt kan lokalisera
  kranskärlen LAD, LCX & RCA.
  - Studeranden kan tillämpa fysiologiska kunskapen, förstår hjärtats elektrofysiologiska aktiveringen, hur
  den elektriska impulsen framskrider och förstår hjärtats kontraktionsförlopp.
  EKG
  Studeranden
  - känner igen normala fynd och de vanligaste avvikelserna,
  - förstår EKG-registreringens felkällor och artefakter samt kan avlägsna dem,
  - känner igen EKG-fynd som kräver omedelbar vård. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   The Basics of Bioanalysis BAA22VB01-3001 29.08.2022-24.09.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills about bioanalytics and laboratory work
  - have fundamental skills about the role of laboratory examinations in the patient care.
  - have fundamental skills in the laboratory testing process
  - have basic knowledge in cell biology, microbiology, immunology, biochemistry, and molecule biology, and the impact of this knowledge on clinical laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Basic knowledge about bioanalytics, laboratory work and lab tests
  Brief history
  Total testing process
  Meaning of lab tests in patient care
  Cell biology in the clinical laboratory
  Microbiology in the clinical laboratory
  Immunology in the clinical laboratory
  Biochemistry in the clinical laboratory
  Molecule biology in the clinical laboratory

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Aktuellt material (vetenskapliga artiklar) meddelas via kursmoodle
  Erlanson-Albertsson. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
  Heino & Vuento. Biokemia ja solubiologia. SanomaPro 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Matikainen, A-M. Miettinen, M. & Wasström, K. Näytteenottajan käsikirja 2016.
  Friman, T., Kuparinen, M., Lehto, L. & Liikanen, E. Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto 2021. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, egna uppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända uppgifter
  Godkänd/Underkänd (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 24.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktiska övningar, skriftliga egna arbeten och presentationer
  
  Del Biovetenskaper: Presentation av eget arbete to 22.9 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp motsvarar 27 h arbete
  3 sp motsvarar 81 h arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgifterna uppfyller inte kriterierna för godkänt vitsord, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Tar emot feedback och utför uppgifter enligt anvisningar
  Tar ansvar för sina uppgifter
  Ställer relevanta frågor för den egna inlärningen
  Kan kommunicera och samarbeta med andra personer i teamet (not translated)

•   The Basics of Bioanalysis 1 BAA22LV01-3001 29.08.2022-31.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
  - are familiar with quality development and management
  -realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - see its role and responsibility as a professional to work for global sustainable social development

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Health care and social welfare in Finland
  Different organizations
  Different aspects of sustainable development
  Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
  Reference range, type of specimen
  Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
  Occupational safety, legislation
  Laboratory equipment
  Specimen collection procedures
  Performing capillary puncture
  Microbiological, cytological specimens,
  Venipuncture
  Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
  Specimen handling and storage

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  
  Mera kursmaterial på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, egna uppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända uppgifter.
  
  Studeranden ska känna till de vanligaste undersökningarna inom klinisk kemi, kl. mikrobiologi och kl. fysiologi. Studeranden kan förbereda och handleda patienten inför provtagning samt kan observera patientens tillstånd efter provtagning. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 25.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 timmar x 2 = 54 h
  24 timmar lektioner
  Uppgifter 30 timmar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen
  har ytlig kunskap i bioanalytikens grunder men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet om än bristfällig
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig kunskap i allmän kemi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen
  kan redogöra för ämnet utan att använda endast litteraturens ord
  förstår det mesta av ämnet
  har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  kan ge en del egna exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen
  har fördjupad kunskap i ämnet
  kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  kommer med egna goda exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

•   The Basics of Bioanalysis 2 BAA22VB02-3002 02.01.2023-17.03.2023  5 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
  - are familiar with quality development and management
  - realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
  - consider security and occupational safety
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in the preanalytical phase

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
  Reference range, type of specimen
  Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
  Occupational safety, legislation
  Laboratory equipment
  Specimen collection procedures
  Performing capillary puncture
  Different aspects of sustainable development
  Microbiological, cytological specimens,
  Venipuncture
  Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
  Specimen handling and storage

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Miettinen, M., & Rusanen, S. (2022). Näytteenottajan käsikirja (3., uudistettu painos.). Edita.
  
  Friman, T., Kuparinen, M., Lehto, L., Liikanen, E., & Kivisalmi, V. (2021). Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (1. painos.). Byrettikustannus avoin yhtiö.
  
  Ericson, E., Ericson, T., & Kan, B. (2018). Klinisk mikrobiologi: Infektioner, immunologi, vårdhygien (5 upplagan.). Liber.
  
  Lund-Egloff, D., & Löwbeer, C. (2014). Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (1. uppl.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänt praktiskt prov,
  Deltagande vid praktiska övningar,
  Tent.
  
  Studeranden ska känna till de vanligaste undersökningarna inom klinisk kemi, kl. mikrobiologi och kl. fysiologi. Studeranden kan förbereda och handleda patienten inför provtagning samt kan observera patientens tillstånd efter provtagning. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 17.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 15.01.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studeranden kan ej förbereda och handleda patienten inför provtagning samt genomföra godkännt det praktiska provet.
  Inte deltagit i de obligatoriska praktiska övningarna.
  Inlämningsuppgiften/tenten uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1.
  
  Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen, praktiskt prov
  har ytlig kunskap i bioanalytikens grunder men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet om än bristfällig
  
  Övningsarbeten
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig kunskap i allmän kemi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen, praktiskt prov
  - kan redogöra för ämnet utan att använda endast litteraturens ord
  - förstår det mesta av ämnet
  - har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  - kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  - kan ge en del egna exempel
  - kan förbereda och handleda patienten vid provtagningssituationen
  
  Övningsarbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen, praktiskt prov
  - har fördjupad kunskap i ämnet
  - kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  - behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  - kommer med egna goda exempel
  - kan förbereda och handleda patienten vid provtagningssituationen utmärkt
  
  Övningsarbeten
  Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

•   Thesis 1 BA18EX01-3003 11.01.2023-24.03.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
  - are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
  - have insights into the research process and problem solution.
  - are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
  - command scientific documentation.
  - are able to present and defend a scientific work.
  - are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
  - are able to critically evaluate their own activities.
  - are able to produce research plan

  Prerequisites

  Theoretical studies
  Basic practice courses

  Content of the study unit

  Introduction to thesis
  Production of research plan and presentaion

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Introduktion till examensarbete (föreläsning)
  Presentation av idéer för examensarbete
  Studerande skriver plan ea
  Presentation av plan för ea (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.01.2023 - 24.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 10.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig idéplan klar inom maj 2023
  Presentation av plan klar inom maj 2023
  Godkänd plan inom maj 2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp är 3 x 27 h arbete (not translated)

•   Thesis 2 BA18EX02-3002 26.03.2023-14.12.2023  6 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
  - are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
  - have insights into the research process and problem solution.
  - are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
  - command scientific ducumentation.
  - are able to produce, present and defend a scientific work.
  - are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
  - are able to critically evaluate their own activities.

  Prerequisites

  Theoretical studies
  Basic practice courses

  Content of the study unit

  Producing research work
  Supervision of thesis work

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Eget arbete
  Seminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examensarbete bedöms med vitsordet 0-5
  Mognadsprov bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.03.2023 - 14.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 25.03.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examensarbete
  Godkänt mognadsprov (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Offentlig presentation av examensarbeten hösten 2023, vecka 48 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 2 BA18KL02-3002 01.08.2022-31.12.2022  10 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
  - are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
  - are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Laboratory Methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Klinisk laboratoriepraktik inom provtagning, klinisk biokemi, klinisk hematologi, transfusionsmedicn, klinisk mikrobiologi, histopatologi och cytologi, klinisk fysiologi, nuklearmedicin, neurofysiologi. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Genomförd klinisk laboratoriepraktik, inlämnad dagbok samt deltagande i praktikseminarier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk närvaro på praktik (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp motsvarar 27 h
  Praktik 37,5 h/kalendervecka, därtill praktikdagbok samt deltagande i seminarium (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  För godkänt krävs genomförd klinisk laboratoriepraktik, inlämnad dagbok samt deltagande i praktikseminarier (not translated)

•   Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 3 BA18KL03-3002 01.08.2022-31.12.2022  8 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
  - are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
  - are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Laboratory Methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Klinisk laboratoriepraktik inom provtagning, klinisk biokemi, klinisk hematologi, transfusionsmedicn, klinisk mikrobiologi, histopatologi och cytologi, klinisk fysiologi, nuklearmedicin, neurofysiologi (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Genomförd klinisk laboratoriepraktik, inlämnad dagbok samt deltagande i praktikseminarier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk närvaro på praktik (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp motsvarar 27 h
  Praktik 37,5 h/kalendervecka, därtill praktikdagbok samt deltagande i seminarium (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  För godkänt krävs genomförd klinisk laboratoriepraktik, inlämnad dagbok samt deltagande i praktikseminarier (not translated)

•   Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 4 BA14KL04-3003 03.04.2023-13.10.2023  9 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory testing process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory tests, both in the collection of specimens and near patient examinations.
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into clinical laboratory work and have developed a constructively critical and developmental grasp of the work.
  - are prepared to carry out quality assurance and improvement.
  - understand the ethical guidelines that are fundamental to the work
  - are able to provide expertise and advise
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.

  Prerequisites

  Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 1-3

  Content of the study unit

  Can choose to do practical training from these:
  Work Practice in blood and other specimens collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Praktik 37,5 h/kalendervecka
  Obligatorisk närvaro 100 %
  Godkända uppgifter, deltagande i utvärdering av praktiken och slutseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  Har tillfredställande nått målen för praktikavsnittet
  Kan ta emot feedback och visar vilja att utveckla yrkesskickligheten
  Följer arbetslistan och håller överenskomna tider
  Kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  Arbetar för det mesta planmässigt och har en grundläggande noggrannhet i viktiga arbetsmoment
  Kan utföra arbetsuppgifter under handledning
  Har kunskaper och kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  Kan följa direktiv och anvisningar och tar ansvar för uppgifter
  Kan fatta beslut som rör arbetsuppgifter
  Känner till värdegrunden och beaktar de yrkesetiska principerna
  Kan kommunicera och bemöta patienter/klienter/kunder
  kan samarbeta med andra inom arbetsteamet (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.04.2023 - 13.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  05.12.2022 - 08.05.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

•   practice: The Basics of Bioanalysis BAA22VB03-3002 20.03.2023-30.04.2023  4 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills in the preanalytical phase that includes patient care, preparations, equipment and material, specimen types and collection methods
  - realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
  - consider security and occupational safety
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

  Prerequisites

  The Basics of Bioanalysis 1 and 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical laboratory practical training in phlebotomy

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  37,5h/week

  Learning methods

  Clinical laboratory practice, seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Genomförd klinisk laboratoriepraktik, inlämnad dagbok samt deltagande i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.03.2023 - 30.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 19.03.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk närvaro på praktik och sluteseminarium. (not translated)

Academic year 2023 - 2024

There is no implementations attached to this degree programme.