Academic year 2023 - 2024

•   Biochemical Bioanalysis 1 BAA22BI01-3001 08.01.2024-25.02.2024  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
  - are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  - are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
  - have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
  - understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
  - master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
  - are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

  Prerequisites

  Biochemistry

  Content of the study unit

  Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
  Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
  Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
  Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
  Scientific articles
  Lecture material

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written examination and mandatory task
  Course grade 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 12.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  8 - 14

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 21.02 2024
  Re-examination 05.04.2024, 24.05.2024 and 13.09.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of the subject

•   Biochemical Bioanalysis 2 BAA22BI02-3001 19.02.2024-29.03.2024  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
  - are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  - are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
  - have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
  - understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
  - master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
  - are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

  Prerequisites

  Biochemistry

  Content of the study unit

  Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
  Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
  Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
  Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
  Scientific articles
  Lecture material

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written examination and mandatory task
  Course grade 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.02.2024 - 29.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.02.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  8 - 14

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 28.03.2024
  Re-examination 03.05.2024, 24.05.2024 and 13.09.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of the subject

•   Biomedical Laboratory Science and Ethics BAA22LV02-3001 20.04.2024-29.10.2024  4 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic insights into biomedical laboratory science and its relation to other sciences.
  - have basic insights into professional and legal ethics.
  - develop an ethical approach and works for a sustainable professional activity
  - have basic insights into quality improvement in the biomedical laboratory

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Essential components of Biomedical laboratory science
  Ethical aspects and visions for the future
  Quality management within the professional field
  Sustainable aspects of the work

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Moodle kurs (inga föreläsningar) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.04.2024 - 29.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.04.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Gunell

  Additional information

  Kursens syfte är att ge en inblick i etik kopplat till laboratorieverksamheten.
  Kursen syftar även till att ge kunskap om patientnära verksamhet, preanalytiska, analytiska och postanalytiska faser samt provtagningsmetodik med betoning på hygien och smittspridning.
  
  Kompetenser är att studerande:
  - har grundläggande insikter i biomedicinsk laboratorievetenskap och dess relation till andra vetenskaper
  - har insikter i professionell och juridisk etik
  - har grundläggande beredskap för kvalitetsutveckling inom det egna verksamhetsområdet
  
  Kurs innehåll:
  - Innehållet utgår från faserna och helheten i den kliniska laboratorieverksamheten på en mer abstrakt nivå och fokuserar på viktiga delar - utgångspunkter i verksamheten, kunskap inom och kring området.
  - etisk reflektion
  - kvalitetsöversikt
  - framtidsvisoner (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 sp x 27h = 108h arbete (not translated)

•   Biomethodology 2 BAA22KM02-3001 08.01.2024-17.03.2025  4 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
  - are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
  - are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
  - have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
  - consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Molecular biological methods
  Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Laboratory instructions and accompanying theoretical material

  Learning methods

  Laboratory work with documentation, and accompanying theory

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Mandatory presence and documentation of the lab work

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 17.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  03.12.2022 - 15.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  8 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory presence at laboratory work
  Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

  Student's schedule and workload

  Laboratory work in electrophoresis and documentation (54 h)
  Laboratory work in molecular biology and documentation (54 h)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  The grade passed require presence during all laboratory work and documentation of the lab work

•   Clinical nursing care RBA22VG03-3002 04.09.2023-29.10.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  -have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
  -have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

  Prerequisites

  Basic nursing care
  Clinical basic nursing care internship

  Content of the study unit

  Internal medical illnesses
  Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
  Emergency care and intensive care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  INREMEDICIN och KIRURGISK VÅRD
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  Kapitel 7. Omvårdnad vid hjärtsjukdomar.
  Kapitel 8. Omvårdnad vid cirkulationssvikt.
  Kapitel 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen
  Kapitel: omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 17. Omvårdnad vid diabetes mellitus
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten
  Kapitel 25. Klinisk omvårdnad vid stroke
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle och annat som anges under lektionerna
  
  AKUT och INTENSIVVÅRD
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur, AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  Aktuell forskning inom akut och intensivvård. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridundervisning
  Föreläsningar
  Demonstrationer
  Videor
  Grupparebten
  Individuella arbeten
  Praktiska övningar (OBLIGATORISKA) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Förkunskapskrav
  Klinisk grundvård
  Klinisk grundvårdspraktik (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  AKUTVÅRD, INTENSIVVÅRD & INREMEDICIN OCH KIRURGISK VÅRD
  Skriftlig tentamen, 1 gången i klass,
  övriga gånger på allmänna omtentamenstillfällen. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp 27h. totalt 3sp 81h
  
  INREMEDICIN OCH KIRURGISK VÅRD
  Teori 4h + 4h + 3h+ 4h + 3h = 18h
  
  Studier på egen hand 17 h
  
  AKUTVÅRD
  Teori 4 h
  NEWS test (nätbaserad) 1 h
  
  INTENSIVVÅRD
  Teori 4h
  Lyssna på podd + inlämningsuppgift 3 h
  
  PRAKTISKA ÖVNINGAR
  Iv-kanylering övningar 4 h/ studerande (ändast rtg studeranden)
  
  Gemensam tentamen: 2 h
  
  27h för eget arbete och tentamens läsning (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen
  kan räkna upp och beskriva endast med litteraturens ord (utantill läsning),
  har ytlig kunskap i ämnet och förståelsen är bristfällig men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig substanskunskap. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen
  kan redogöra för ämnet utan att använda endast litteraturens ord
  förstår det mesta av ämnet
  har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  kan ge en del egna exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen
  har fördjupad kunskap i ämnet
  kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  kommer med egna goda exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt). (not translated)

•   Hematological Bioanalysis 2 BA14BA02-3004 04.09.2023-08.12.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the laboratory examination process in its entirety, but also the thorough phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
  - are familiar with laboratory examinations and are able to evaluate laboratory examination results related to blood cell disorders, acute leukemia and blood transfusion control.
  - actively looks for and are able to assimilate new knowledge.
  - are able to work as an expert in the field.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Biosciences
  Bioanalysis

  Content of the study unit

  Blood cells and blood cell disorders
  Bone marrow examination
  Laboratory examinations and methods at blood cells disorders related to erythrocytes, leukocytes, thrombocytes

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
  Hoffbrand & Moss. 2011. Essential Haematology.
  Porkka, K., Lassila, R., Remes, K., Savolainen, E-R. toimittajat., Anttila, P. kirjoittaja & Rusanen, S. kuvittaja. 2015. Veritaudit. Helsinki : Duodecim.
  E-böcker i hematologi på bibliotekssidan (not translated)

  Learning methods

  On-line course
  Tasks, exercises and self studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande
  - är förtrogen med laboratorieundersökningsprocessen som helhet samt de ingående faserna: den preanalytiska, den analytiska, den postanalytiska
  - har kunskap om laboratorieundersökningar och metoder samt kan bedöma laboratorieundersökningsresultat relaterade till erytrocyt- leukocyt- och trombocytrelaterade tillstånd, akuta leukemier och blodtransfusionskontroll
  - söker aktivt och kan tillgodogöra sig ny kunskap
  - kan fungera som sakkunnig inom området
  - har beredskap att utveckla kvaliteten och beakta hållbar utveckling inom bioanalytiken (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 08.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 16.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Förkunskapskrav:
  
  Biovetenskaper
  Bioanalytik (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Dead-lines found on the Moodle course

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr = 81 h

•   Hematological Methodology 1 BAA22KM05-3002 04.09.2023-08.10.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying blood cells
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
  - have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

  Prerequisites

  The Basics of Bioanalysis

  Content of the study unit

  Hematological methods to study blood cells
  Other hematological tests

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.
  
  Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.
  
  Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.
  
  Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)
  
  O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.
  
  More litterature in Moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, clinical practice in class and individual tasks

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Practice in class: pass or fail
  Practical exam
  Approved assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Förkunskapskrav: Hematologi 1 & Bioanalytikens grunder 1 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1 sp Theory + individual task
  2 sp Workshops; microscopy of blood cells
  
  Practice in class: pass or fail
  Practical exam
  Approved assignments

•   Hematological Methodology 2 BAA22KM06-3002 09.10.2023-12.11.2023  2 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
  - have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

  Prerequisites

  The Basics of Bioanalysis

  Content of the study unit

  Hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice in class and individual tasks.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande
  - har färdigheter i laboratorieundersökningsprocessen och hematologiska metoder vid undersökning av ABO‒blodgruppstillhörighet (B-ABORHAB-O), blodgruppsantikroppar i plasma & direkt Coombs Test.
  - kan använda centrala informationskällor och vetenskapliga publikationer rörande metoder inom klinisk hematologi
  - kan granska, analysera och dokumentera laborationsresultat
  - har förmåga att självständigt klara av nya situationer som hör till verksamhetsområdet
  - har grundläggande insikter i tillhörande kvalitetssäkring och -utveckling
  - beaktar säkerhet och arbetarskydd
  - är medveten om hur man gör hållbara val i laboratoriearbetet (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.10.2023 - 12.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 13.10.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Kunskapskrav: Hematologi 2
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  2 sp = 54h
  
  Praktiska övningar i klass: GK / UK
  Godkända uppgifter (not translated)

•   Hematology 2 BAA22BV11-3002 28.08.2023-22.12.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
  - have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
  - understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Hemostaseology
  Immunhematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Finnish red cross Blood service https://www.bloodservice.fi/

  Learning methods

  Virtual course.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  Har insikter i koagulationsprocessen och blodtransfusionsläran.
  Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar och i undersökningsprocessen i relation till dessa.
  Är förtrogen med terminologin inom hemostas och immunhematologi.
  Känner till centrala informationskällor inom området.
  Förstår betydelsen av hemostas och immunhematologi inom bioanalytik. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 22.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 11.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Additional information

  Innehåll:
  
  1 sp (27h) Trombocyter, plasmakoagulationsproteiner/faktorer och relation till blodkärlsskada, första tätning, betående tätning och fibrinolys.
  2 sp (54h) Blodgrupper och blodtransfusionskontroll samt laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
  
  Syftet i kursen är att studeranden:
  
  Har insikter i hemostasmekanismen/koagulationsprocessen.
  Har grundläggande insikter i blodgruppsserologi och transfusionsmedicin.
  Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
  Känner till de vanligaste sjukdomarnas prevention, diagnostisering och behandlingsformer inom kursens tyngdpunktsområden. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Histopathological and Cytological Bioanalysis BA18BI09-3002 05.10.2023-09.12.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have insights into the analysis of cells and tissues in relation to different organ diseases.
  - have fundamental insights into cytology and histopathology
  - command the clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within cytological and histopathological bioanalysis.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Cell biology
  Histology

  Content of the study unit

  Cytological and histopathological bioanalysis
  Clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kliininen sytologia. Koivuniemi. Kandidaattikustannus
  Cytology. Edmund Cibas Barbara Ducatman. Elsevier
  Histology. Ross & Pawlina. Lippincott
  Bancroft's Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. Suvarna, Layton, Bancroft.Elsevier
  https://bethesda.soc.wisc.edu/index.htm
  https://www.eurocytology.eu/en/home
  https://sksy.yhdistysavain.fi/linkit/
  https://www.suomenhistotekniikanyhdistys.fi/
  https://www.omicsonline.org/histology/best-open-access-journals-in-histology.php
  https://www.journals.elsevier.com/pathology/open-access-articles
  https://www.nsh.org/about/overview
  https://uia.org/s/or/en/1100063824
  http://www.ihcworld.com/weblinks.htm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, selfstudies and written assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Exam with assessment 0-5 and approved assignments during the course.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2023 - 09.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 04.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Petra Lithén

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 5.12.2023
  Re-take 19.1.2024 and 8.3.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 19 h, self studies and assignments 62 h

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i histopatologisk och cytologisk bioanalytik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i histopatologisk och cytologisk bioanalytik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i histopatologisk och cytologisk bioanalytik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i histopatologisk och cytologisk bioanalytik (not translated)

•   Immunologcal Methodology BAA22BI06-3001 08.01.2024-30.04.2024  5 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
  - understand the principles of the immunological methods.
  - command advanced terminology of immunology.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Immunology

  Content of the study unit

  Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Marin, Burton and Roit, 13th edition, published by Wiley Blackwell, 2017 and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.

  Learning methods

  Hybrid teaching methods
  Group or individual assignment
  Presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade
  Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 30.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 26.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  8 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information, tasks and quizzes is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. In order to get a passed grade 70 % of the answers in the exam need to be correct.
  Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade. Exam 22.03.2024. Re-examination 24.05 or 13.09.2024
  Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail. A failed grade means that the assignment was inadequat

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Medical Treatment RBA22BV05-3001 04.09.2023-22.10.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
  - are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
  - are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
  - command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
  - are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
  - are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Medication administration and different medication groups
  Pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
  SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  
  Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
  Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
  Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar
  armacology distributed by the teacher

  Learning methods

  lectures and seminars
  tasks and tests

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Task passed not approved
  test 0-5 scale

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 22.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg, Pia Nygårdas

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Microbiological Methodology BAA22KM04-3002 13.11.2023-31.05.2024  5 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
  - are able to collect specimens for microbiology
  - are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
  - have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
  - have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Microbiology, immunology, pathology 1 and 2

  Content of the study unit

  Microbiological methodology
  Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Additional literature:
  Carlson & Linder. Introduktion till mikrobiologi.
  Hedman et al. Mikrobiologia.
  Murray, Rosenthal & Pfaller. Medical Microbiology. 8th edition.
  https://www.elsevier.com/books/medical-microbiology/murray/978-0-323-29956-5
  Bok på nätet http://www.microbiologybook.org/book/bact-sta.htm

  Learning methods

  Theory and laboratory work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Mandatory presence at laboratory work
  Written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.11.2023 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 12.11.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  8 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1, Mikaela Engvall, Petra Lithén

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory attendance at laboratory work
  Written tasks

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 cr equals 135 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Passed laboratory work and written assignments

•   Microbiological bioanalysis 1 BA14BI03-3003 28.08.2023-20.11.2023  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have profound knowledge of microbiological methodology and clinical bacteriology
  - are familiar with the laboratory work process in its entirety, but also its phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
  - understand the role of labotary results and result interpretation within microbiological bioanalysis.
  - command the terminology of clinical microbiology.
  - are able to use sources of information and scientific publications that are central to the field, concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within microbiological bioanalysis.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bio analysis.

  Prerequisites

  Microbiology
  Microbiological methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Microbiological methodology and clinical bacteriology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Lecturematerial
  Ericson E., Ericson T. och Kan B. Klinisk mikrobiologi, Liber upplaga 5.
  Murray, Rosenthal & Pfaller. Medical Microbiology. 8th edition.
  Ebook http://www.microbiologybook.org/book/bact-sta.htm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5. Course assignments are graded passed/failed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 20.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 06.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Petra Lithén

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 10.11.2023
  Re-examination 8.12.2023 and 19.1.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 20 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 61 h

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i mikrobiologisk bioanalytik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i mikrobiologisk bioanalytik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i mikrobiologisk bioanalytik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i mikrobiologisk bioanalytik. (not translated)

•   Molecular Biology BAA22BV12-3001 15.01.2024-25.02.2024  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
  - understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
  - master basic genetic calculations
  - master terminology of molecular biology
  - have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
  - are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
  - understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Genes, gene expression and genetics
  Terminology of molecular biology
  Methods in molecular biology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Gunell

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
  Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
  Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
  Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
  Lecture material on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures and tasks. Self studies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written examination and mandatory task
  Course grade 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.01.2024 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 16.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  8 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Gunell

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 12.02 2024
  Re-examination 08.03.2024, 03.05.2024 and 13.09.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

•   Nuclear Medical Bioanalysis and Radiation Safety BAA22BI07-3002 18.09.2023-08.11.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
  - are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
  - know the basic principles of radiation safety
  - know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
  - have fundamental insights into patient care.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology

  Content of the study unit

  Use of gamma camera
  The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
  Nuclear medical pathology
  Radiation safety
  Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the lecturer

  Learning methods

  Lectures and group assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam. The calculation test is graded passed or failed. In order to pass the course both exam and the calculation test need to be passed

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 08.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 30.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Radiografi och strålbehandling 1

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination the 3rd of November 2023.
  Re-take on Friday 8.12.2023 and Friday 19.01.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of the subject.
  Calculation test failed

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of the subject

•   Patient Safety BAA22VG05-3001 08.01.2024-31.03.2024  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
  - can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in the professional field
  - can evaluate the quality of care and be aware of good sustainable choices in the work
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
  - understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
  - is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
  - knows the uses of medical radiation
  - has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
  - has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
  Quality development
  Patient safety

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Radiation safety: according to the lecturer, see Moodle

  Learning methods

  Radiation safety: Lectures, workshops

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 31.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Radiation saftey: on-line examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  Radiation safety 1sp= 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Radiation safety: insufficient knowledge of the subject

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Radiation saftey exam:
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Radiation safety exam:
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Radiation safety exam:
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples

•   Pharmacology RBA22BV06-3001 15.09.2023-10.11.2023  2 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
  Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
  Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
  Lecture material on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.09.2023 - 10.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 14.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda, Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination x.x 2023
  Re-examination x.x.2023 and x.x.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination x h, self studies and digital teaching methods x h

•   Physiological and neurophysiological Bioanalysis BAA22BI04-3002 05.09.2023-24.11.2023  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
  - have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
  - have fundamental insights into patient care.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology

  Content of the study unit

  Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material on Moodle
  
  Henriksson, O., & Rasmusson, M. (2018). Fysiologi med relevant anatomi (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Sovijärvi, A., Hartiala, J., Knuuti, J., Laitinen, T., Malmberg, P., & Haapalahti, P. (2018). Kliinisen fysiologian ja isotooppilääketieteen perusteet (Nyaste upplagan). Duodecim.
  
  Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U. (2014). Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

  Learning methods

  Lessons in classrooms
  Practical exercises
  Assignments on Moodle
  Exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Performed assignments and the course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2023 - 24.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Petra Lithén

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance.
  
  In the course we review the common physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods.
  
  The students
  - have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
  - have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
  - have fundamental insights into patient care.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination 21.11.2023

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81h
  Lessons and practical exercises 20 h
  Self-study 61 h

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och neurofysiologisk bioanalytik, (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och neurofysiologisk bioanalytik, (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och neurofysiologisk bioanalytik, (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och neurofysiologisk bioanalytik, (not translated)

•   Practice: Clinical Laboratory work 1 BAA22KL01-3001 01.04.2024-02.06.2024  10 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
  - are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
  - are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Laboratory Methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 02.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.02.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Sanna Gunell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   The theoretical basics in nursing care RBA22VG04-3002 02.10.2023-03.11.2023  2 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Fundamental components of caring science

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  VÅRDVETENSKAP
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Rehnsfeldt, A. & Arman, M. (red.). 2020. Klinisk vårdvetenskap. Vårdande på teoretisk grund. Stockholm: Liber Ab.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  VÅRDETIK
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 4. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, grupparbeten och självstudier. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 03.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.10.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Seats

  6 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro på introduktionsföreläsning och seminarier (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkänt grupparbete (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar (not translated)

•   Thesis and maturity test BA18EX03-3002 14.11.2023-20.12.2023  6 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

  Prerequisites

  Theoretical studies
  Basic practice courses

  Content of the study unit

  Presentation of Thesis
  Opponentship
  Maturity test based on the thesis work and written expression

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Eget arbete
  Seminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examensarbete bedöms med vitsordet 0-5
  Mognadsprov bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.11.2023 - 20.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 13.11.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Sanna Gunell, Anita Kvist, Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examensarbete
  Godkänt mognadsprov (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Offentlig presentation av examensarbeten hösten 2023, vecka 48 (not translated)

Academic year 2024 - 2025

•   Basic Nursing Care RBA22VG02-3003 16.09.2024-01.12.2024  3 credits  (UBA24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
  - are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
  - are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing methods
  Ergonomics in the work
  Aseptic manners
  Nursing process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Terveysportti
  Vårdhandboken
  Moodle material
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Self-study
  On-campus teaching
  Individual works
  practical exercises at KTC - Compulsory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is graded 0-5
  Written exercises are assessed UK/GK
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK/GK

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.09.2024 - 01.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA24D-V
  • URS24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% for practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved submissions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Autumn 2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ECT

•   Biomethodology 1 BAA22KM01-3002 26.08.2024-07.06.2026  4 credits  (UBA24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic knowledge and skills in microscopy and cell biological, immunological and histological methods.
  - command the basic settings of the microscope.
  - are able to carry out cell biological, immunological and histological laborations according to method descriptions.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in biosciences.
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory work.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the work.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Microscopy
  Cell biological, immunological and histological methods.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material finns på kursens moodlesida (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursen innehåller teori om biometodik och laborationer. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningen baserar sig på
  - godkänd Köhlerinställning och mikroskopering
  
  - godkända laborationer och uppgifter (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.08.2024 - 07.06.2026

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2024 - 30.11.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan inte tenteras.
  Mikroskopieringen innehåller en praktisk tentamen på Campus. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifternas inlämningsdatum finns på kursmoodlen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande.
  Hösten 2024: Mikroskopi 1 sp
  Mikroskopilaborationer 20 h
  Uppgift 7 h
  
  Våren 25: 2 SP.
  I studiepoängen ingår laborationer och uppgifter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Tar emot feedback och utför praktiska uppgifter under handledning
  Följer anvisningar, beaktar säkerhet och tar ansvar för sina uppgifter
  Ställer relevanta frågor för den egna inlärningen
  Kan kommunicera och samarbeta med andra personer i teamet (not translated)

•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication RBA22IN01-3003 02.09.2024-17.11.2024  4 credits  (UBA24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Swedish 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbeten.
  Material på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test ( library/ informationservice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kommunikation
  
  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat.
  Förkunskapskrav
  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2024 - 29.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA24D-V
  • URS24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Språkservice 1, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kommunikation: Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen.
  Introduktion: On-line tent i informationssökning samt i inroduktionskursens material (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:Underkänd
  Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
  Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kommunikation:
  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
  • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
  • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
  • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)

•   Practice: Clinical Laboratory Work 2 BAA22KL02-3001 26.08.2024-17.11.2024  10 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
  - are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
  - are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Laboratory Methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information.

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship 8 weeks.
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  
  - participated in practice information,
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the course,
  - all practical assignments must be approved,
  - participated in practical seminar &
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.08.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2024 - 30.09.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad.

  Student's schedule and workload

  The student must be at the internship site 37,5h per week and an additional 2,5 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 37,5h in the field.
  
  Internship seminar 3 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   The Basics of Bioanalysis 1 BAA22LV01-3003 30.09.2024-30.11.2024  3 credits  (UBA24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
  - are familiar with quality development and management
  -realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - see its role and responsibility as a professional to work for global sustainable social development

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Health care and social welfare in Finland
  Different organizations
  Different aspects of sustainable development
  Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
  Reference range, type of specimen
  Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
  Occupational safety, legislation
  Laboratory equipment
  Specimen collection procedures
  Performing capillary puncture
  Microbiological, cytological specimens,
  Venipuncture
  Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
  Specimen handling and storage

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Mikaela Engvall

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  
  An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).
  
  Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).
  
  More material provided on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, egna studier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända uppgifter.
  
  Studeranden ska känna till de vanligaste undersökningarna inom klinisk kemi, kl. mikrobiologi och kl. fysiologi. Studeranden kan förbereda och handleda patienten inför provtagning samt kan observera patientens tillstånd efter provtagning. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 30.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2024 - 31.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Vasanejdens bioanalytiker rf (VASLY) deltar i kursen och berättar om förbundet samt bioanalytikerns yrke.
  Facebook: Vasly
  Instagram: vaasanseudunbioanalyytikot (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 timmar x 3 sp = 81 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Tentamen
  har ytlig kunskap i bioanalytikens grunder men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet om än bristfällig
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig kunskap i allmän kemi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Tentamen
  kan redogöra för ämnet utan att använda endast litteraturens ord
  förstår det mesta av ämnet
  har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
  kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
  kan ge en del egna exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
  Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Tentamen
  har fördjupad kunskap i ämnet
  kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
  behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
  kommer med egna goda exempel
  
  Övningsarbete
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

•   Thesis 1 BAA22EX01-3001 14.10.2024-15.12.2024  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
  - are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
  - have insights into the research process and problem solution.
  - are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
  - command scientific documentation.
  - are able to present and defend a scientific work.
  - are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
  - are able to critically evaluate their own activities.
  - are able to produce research plan

  Prerequisites

  Theoretical studies
  Basic practice courses

  Content of the study unit

  Introduction to thesis
  Production of research plan and presentaion
  Producing research work
  Supervision of thesis work

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.10.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.07.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5