Study Guide

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge of general and inorganic chemistry, as well as basic chemical concepts and nomenclature
- master the basics of chemical reactions, chemical reaction rates and equilibrium, acids, bases, pH, pKa, pKb, the states of matter, the mole relations of gases and thermochemistry, redox reactions and electrochemistry

Content

General and inorganic chemistry
Basic chemical concepts and chemical reactions

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
- understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
- have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
- are familiar with quality development and management
-realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- see its role and responsibility as a professional to work for global sustainable social development

Content

Health care and social welfare in Finland
Different organizations
Different aspects of sustainable development
Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
Reference range, type of specimen
Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
Occupational safety, legislation
Laboratory equipment
Specimen collection procedures
Performing capillary puncture
Microbiological, cytological specimens,
Venipuncture
Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
Specimen handling and storage

Location and time

Autumn 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)

Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)

Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)

An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).

Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).

More material provided on Moodle.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
- are familiar with quality development and management
- realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in the preanalytical phase

Content

Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
Reference range, type of specimen
Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
Occupational safety, legislation
Laboratory equipment
Specimen collection procedures
Performing capillary puncture
Different aspects of sustainable development
Microbiological, cytological specimens,
Venipuncture
Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
Specimen handling and storage

Location and time

Spring 2025
University of Applied Science, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Miettinen, M., & Rusanen, S. (2022). Näytteenottajan käsikirja (3., uudistettu painos.). Edita.

Friman, T., Kuparinen, M., Lehto, L., Liikanen, E., & Kivisalmi, V. (2021). Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (1. painos.). Byrettikustannus avoin yhtiö.

Ericson, E., Ericson, T., & Kan, B. (2018). Klinisk mikrobiologi: Infektioner, immunologi, vårdhygien (5 upplagan.). Liber.

Lund-Egloff, D., & Löwbeer, C. (2014). Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (1. uppl.). Studentlitteratur.

Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.

Student workload

5 sp Total 135 h
Mandatory attendance.

Content scheduling

1. Introduction to Laboratory Operations
- Laboratory operations and sampling process
- Laboratory examinations in relation to the patient’s overall care
2. Reference Values and Sample Material
- Biochemical Laboratory Examinations: Proteins & Carbohydrates; Lipids, electrolytes & cardiac markers
- Hematological examinations
3. Patient Preparation and Preanalytical Factors
- Patient preparation
- Preanalytical factors
4. Other Sampling Methods
- Microbiological sampling
- Cytological sampling
- EKG and urine sampling

**Practical Exercises: Venous and capillary blood sampling, microbiological sampling, EKG

Further information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved Practical Exam.
Mandatory participation in Practical Exercises.

The student should be familiar with the most common examinations in clinical chemistry, clinical microbiology, and clinical physiology. The student can prepare and guide the patient before sampling and can observe the patient’s condition after sampling.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental insights into molecules that constitute living organisms
- have fundamental insights into biochemical processes
- master biochemical terminology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to biochemistry
- understand the importance of biochemistry in regard to bioanalysis

Content

Biochemical processes
Terminology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to the scedule

Materials

Nelson & Cox. Lehninger Principles of biochemistry. 8th edition. Macmillan 2021
Bruce Alberts, Karen Hopkin, Alexander Johnson, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter. Essential Cell Biology 2019
Erlanson-Albertsson & Gullberg. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 14.03.2025
Re-examination 04.04.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have profound insights into biochemical bioanalysis.
- are familiar with medication analysis, toxicological examinations and the determination of tumour markers, porphyrins, vitamines and tracers, and know the diseases connected to these examinations.
- understand the role of laboratory results and result interpretation within biochemical bioanalytics.
- command the terminology within clinical biochemistry.
- are able to plan a clinical biochemical laboratory examination.
- are familiar with the laboratory work process in its entirety, but also its phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
- are able to use sources of information and scientific publications that are central to the field, concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within biochemical bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)
Clinical toxicology
Homones and brain-specific molecules
Porphyrins, vitamins, minerals and trace elements
Methodology: Mass spectrometry, NMR and enzymology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to schedule

Materials

Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. Burtis, Burns. 7th or 8th ed. Elsevier
Research articles
Material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, literature studies, written assignments

Exam schedules

Deadline for assignments

Completion alternatives

Exam

Student workload

3 cr corresponds to 81 hours of studies

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Assignments are graded 0-5.
Mandatory presence at discussions

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Assignments are inadequate. The student did not participate in the discussions.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The extent of the assignments are weak. The student´s participation in the discussions was weak.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The extent of the assignments are weak. The student´s participation in the discussions was weak.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The extent of the assignments are weak. The student´s participation in the discussions was excellent.

Qualifications

Biosciences

Objective

The students
- have basic knowledge and skills in microscopy and cell biological, immunological and histological methods.
- command the basic settings of the microscope.
- are able to carry out cell biological, immunological and histological laborations according to method descriptions.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in biosciences.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory work.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the work.

Content

Microscopy
Cell biological, immunological and histological methods.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the structure and function of the cells.
- are familiar with the function of the cell organelles.
- are able to identify the cell organelles.
- are familiar with cell splitting and cell death.
- are familiar with human cells and embryology.
- command terminology of cell biology.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within cell biology.
- understand the importance of cell biology within bioanalysis.

Content

Cells and cell organelles, structure and function
Terminology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
- is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
- has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
- is aware of cultural differences in international context

Content

English (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

Teaching methods

Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

More information on Moodle.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Performed presentation, written exam.

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 hours

Content scheduling

-

Further information

Active participation is required.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The students
- understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
- are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
- have insights into the research process and problem solution.
- are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
- command scientific documentation.
- are able to present and defend a scientific work.
- are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
- are able to critically evaluate their own activities.
- are able to produce research plan

Content

Introduction to thesis
Production of research plan and presentaion
Producing research work
Supervision of thesis work

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

According to the topic of Thesis

Recommended literature: Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Introduction lecture to the course, thesis work, followed by mainly self-directed studies with possibility to supervision. The student makes a plan for the thesis. The presentation of the plan for the thesis is the examination

Employer connections

The Thesis can be a work ordered, but is not necessary always so

Exam schedules

Presentation of work plan for thesis autumn 2024 and presentation of the thesis in May 2025

Completion alternatives

No optional examination form

Student workload

The course is 3 cr which is equivalent to 81 h work for the student

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

If the thesis plan is done according to instructions it is assessed as passed.

Further information

The content of the work plan for thesis:
Novia titlepage
Table of content
Introduction
Background (description of the topic, at least 5-6 scientific studies)
Aim and problem definition
Method (Data collection based on 2 references/discuss method of selection)
Ethical consideration (based on references)
Timetable
Reference list
Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis)

1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle (no key needed)
2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest of studying it.
4. Background shall be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters where description of concepts and the topic of the subject. In the background you also describe the previous research done
5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
6. The method can be described on 2-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. refer to relevant documents on Finnish National advicory board on Research Integrity TENK. (tenk.fi)
8. Time plan should estimate how Thesis proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
9. Works cited

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The work plan for the thesis is assessed as either failed or passed.

The plan must include the following parts (for passing):
• Novia cover page
• Table of contents
• Introduction (at least 1 page): must include at least 2 sources
• Purpose and research questions
• Background (at least 4 pages). Must include: for one student: at least 6 sources, of which at least 2 are scientific and for two students: at least 9 sources, of which at least 4 are scientific
• Method (at least 1 page): Selection; Data collection; Data analysis method; Ethical considerations and Timeline
• References (of the sources used in the plan)

Length: at least 6 pages and at most 9 pages (excluding cover page, table of contents, and references)

Must follow Novia's writing guidelines: https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/

Qualifications

Theoretical studies
Basic practice courses

Objective

The students
- understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
- are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
- have insights into the research process and problem solution.
- are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
- command scientific ducumentation.
- are able to produce, present and defend a scientific work.
- are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
- are able to critically evaluate their own activities.

Content

Producing research work
Supervision of thesis work

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Employer connections

Topic for thesis.

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at the Mid-seminar according to schedual

Student workload

27 h/cr corresponds to 162 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Passed:
The structure of the thesis is according to instructions.
The background is relevant and informative, and motivates the choice of research topic
The aim and research questions have a clear delimitation
The collection of data material and the analysis of the data is ongoing
The references are relevant and relates to the aim and research questions
The list of references are done correctly according to instructions given for writing a thesis

Further information

Thesis plan should be accepted before the student take part of the Mid-seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Students follow the instructions for the mid-seminar.
The data collection must be completed and the data analysis started for passing.
Those who cannot participate (or have not progressed far enough in the EA process) will receive a passed grade when the completed thesis is presented.

Qualifications

Theoretical studies
Basic practice courses

Objective

Student
- can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
- can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

Content

Presentation of Thesis
Opponentship
Maturity test based on the thesis work and written expression

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Week 21 of Spring 2025 and week x of Fall 2025

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Written thesis
Seminar

Employer connections

Presentation of thesis in public

Exam schedules

Spring 2025 week 21 presentation of thesis and maturity exam
Fall 2025 week x

Completion alternatives

Thesis
Maturity test

Further information

More information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is graded 0-5
Opposition of another student's work passed or failed
Maturity test is graded passed or failed

Qualifications

Theoretical studies
Basic practice courses

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 28.5.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination x h, self studies and digital teaching methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

Students
- can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
- can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
- can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
- can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
- can make simple statistical calculations and tests
- has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work

Content

Qualitative and quantitative research methods

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
Qualitative methods:
Course literature :
Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
Qualitative methods: lectures and group discussion and assignment

Exam schedules

Quantitative method: the assignment has to be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course
Qualitative method: written assignment and presentation within a seminar

Completion alternatives

Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 0-5, 1-5 is a passed grade)
qualitative methods: written assignment and presentation (graded according to the scale 0-5., where 1-5 is a passed grade)

Student workload

Quantitative research methodology is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours work of which 12 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.
Qualitative methods is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Qualitative method: based on a exam, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental concepts and understanding the research process and analysis approaches, is evaluated. Written assignments have to be done on time.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply the research process and analysis methods.
Written assignments missing or inadequate.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of analysis methods and is not adequately preform content analysis

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply concepts analysis , and only minor errors are found in the analysis process.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding and makes only insignificant errors when applying the methods.

Qualifications

Research methodology

Objective

The students
- have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
- can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

Content

Science theory and evidence-based knowledge
Research approaches
Research process

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Course literature :
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Teaching methods

Lectures, group discussion and assignments

Exam schedules

Course examination 01.10.2024
Re-examination 25.10 and 13.12
Written assignments according to schedule

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

The course is 3 cr which corresponds to 81 hours of work

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam and the individual, written assignments.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and assignments) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The students does not understand and can not apply the methods of qualitative research

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Notable weakness are found in students understanding and application on the research aims and questions or the data collection stage

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding and can apply qualitative concepts into the different research phases

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students demonstrates a complete understanding for qualitative concepts of research and make only insignificant errors when applying and planing research

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
- are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.

Content

First aid
Health care in case of emergency

Location and time

spring 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills about bioanalytics and laboratory work
- have fundamental skills about the role of laboratory examinations in the patient care.
- have fundamental skills in the laboratory testing process
- have basic knowledge in cell biology, microbiology, immunology, biochemistry, and molecule biology, and the impact of this knowledge on clinical laboratory examinations

Content

Basic knowledge about bioanalytics, laboratory work and lab tests
Brief history
Total testing process
Meaning of lab tests in patient care
Cell biology in the clinical laboratory
Microbiology in the clinical laboratory
Immunology in the clinical laboratory
Biochemistry in the clinical laboratory
Molecule biology in the clinical laboratory

Location and time

Autumn 2024
YH Novia Alere, Vasa

Materials

Current material (scientific articles and lecture material), the information given via the Moodle page of the course.

Erlanson-Albertsson. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
Heino & Vuento. Biokemia ja solubiologia. SanomaPro 2019
Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022

Analytical phase and sampling:
Matikainen, A-M. Miettinen, M. & Wasström, K. Näytteenottajan käsikirja 2016.
Friman, T., Kuparinen, M., Lehto, L. & Liikanen, E. Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto 2021.
Gupte, Satish. The Short Textbook of Medical Laboratory for Technicians 2021.
HOTUS Lyckad laboratorieprovtagning

Teaching methods

Lectures, practical tasks, discussions and selfstudies.

Employer connections

Study visit to Vaasa Central Hospital (the Fimlab laboratory)

Exam schedules

Written, individual work and presentations, and online quizzes.

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

3 cr corresponds to 81 hours of work

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Susceptible to feedback and performs tasks according to instructions
Takes responsibility for their tasks
Asks relevant questions for one's own learning
Able to communicate and collaborate with other people in the team

Content scheduling

Mikaela Engvall Teaching 1 credit (27h), Content: History of bioanalytics education in Finland, the biomedical laboratory scientist's profession and work opportunities, the analytical phase and basic knowledge in bioanalytics, sampling, study visit, 1 individual assignment combined with the study visit.

Camilla Ribacka, teaching 1 cr (27h) : Biochemisty and molecular biology

Sanna Gunell, teaching 1 cr (27 h): Cell biology, microbiology and immunlogy

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Individual tasks, graded passed/failed
Participation in mandatory practical exercises and study visits
Passed/failed quizzes and exams

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The assignments do not meet the criteria for a passed grade. A failed assignment should be improved according to the examiner's feedback and according to the agreed timetable.
Individual quiz failed.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with human cells in the blood and the organs that produce blood (blood production - development and regulation.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests and the examination process connected to it.
- are familiar with the terminology of hematology.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within hematology.
- understand the importance of hematology within bioanalysis.

Content

Blood cells, blood-forming organs
Lab tests
Terminology

Materials

Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. J. P. Greer, D. A. Arber, et. al.;
Chapter 1: Examination of the Blood and Bone
Chapter 2: Clinical Flow Cytometry
Section 1 Hematopoiesis
Section 3 Granulocytes and Monocytes
Section 4 The Lymphocytes

Wintrobe's Atlas of Clinical Hematology. B. Weksler.;
Chapter 1 Approach to the Microscopic evaluation of Blood and Bone Marrow

Practical Flow Cytometry in Haematology Diagnosis. M. Leach, M. Drummond, and A. Doig.;
Principles of Flow Cytometry, Limitations, Normal Blood and Bone Marrow Populations


Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
- understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

Content

Hemostaseology
Immunhematology

Location and time

Virtual (Moodle) course.
Course is open in XX-XX.

Materials

Murphy, M. F. et al., Practical Transfusion Medicine, 2017.

McCullough, J. Transfusion Medicine, 2016.

Reid, M. E., et al. The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 2012.


Finnish red cross, Blood Service: https://www.veripalvelu.fi/en/

SWE:
Gahrton & Juliusson 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
Finlands röda kors blodtjänst. Blod- och plasmaprodukter. Senaste upplaga på FRKB:s hemsida. Helsingfors
Handbok för blodprodukter 2021 (Blodtjänsten)
SPR Blodtjänsten: https://www.blodtjanst.fi/

FIN:
Porkka, Lassila, Remes m fl. 2015. Veritaudit. Duodecim. Helsinki

Teaching methods

Virtual (Moodle) course.

Student workload

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis

Further information

Content:

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis


The purpose of the course is for students to:

- Gain insights into the hemostasis mechanism/coagulation process.
- Acquire fundamental knowledge in blood group serology and transfusion medicine.
- Develop basic understanding of clinical laboratory investigations related to these topics.
- Familiarize themselves with the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment approaches for the most common diseases within the focus areas of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Students:

- Have insights into the coagulation process and blood transfusion theory.
- Possess fundamental knowledge of clinical laboratory investigations and the investigative process related to these.
- Are familiar with the terminology in hemostasis and immunohematology.
- Know central sources of information within this field.
- Understand the significance of hemostasis and immunohematology in clinical laboratory analysis

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
-are familiar with the examination and assessment of peripheral blood smears in connection to different factors that affect the blood cell morphology, and to different illnesses (anemias, infections, other benign conditions, myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative conditions, MDS and leukemias).
-are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
-are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Examination and assessment of normal and pathological peripheral blood smears

Location and time

Spring 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

Perifeerisen veren morfologiaa https://www.terveysportti.fi/apps/dtk/ltk/article/ima02248

Soluvisa https://kivikaarre.fi/soluvisa/

Teaching methods

Lessons, discussion, microscopy

Student workload

1 sp = 27 h work
3 sp = 81 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment Criteria for Practical Examination:

1. Preparation and Technique
- Correct preparation of the blood smear
- Handling of the microscope
2. Accuracy in Cell Counting
- Correct identification and counting of 100/200 leukocytes
- Accuracy in distinguishing between different types of leukocytes
3. Documentation of Results
4. Analysis and Interpretation
- Ability to analyze and interpret the results
- Understanding of any deviations and their clinical significance

Content scheduling

1. Introduction and Basic Principles (Reptition)
Peripheral blood smears and staining
Normal blood cells and their morphology
2. Anemias, Red Side
Classification of anemias
Morphological changes in different types of anemias
Practical exercises
3. Infections and blood smear
Identification of infections in blood smears
Practical exercises
4. Myeloproliferative Disorders
Overview of myeloproliferative diseases
Morphological characteristics in blood smears
Practical exercises
5. Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Introduction to lymphoproliferative diseases
Morphological changes in lymphocytes
Practical exercises
6. Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
Definition and classification of MDS
Morphological changes in blood smears in MDS
Practical exercises
7. Acute Leukemias
Introduction to acute leukemias
Morphological characteristics in blood smears
Practical exercises
8. Practical Examination

Further information

Competencies:

Deeper insights into the assessment of peripheral blood smears in relation to various factors affecting blood cell morphology and different disease conditions.

Content:

Review and assessment of peripheral blood smears

Anemias, red side
Infection smears, other benign conditions
Myeloproliferative disorders
Lymphoproliferative disorders
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)
Acute leukemias

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Examination:

The course examination will be a practical exam. To pass the course, students must reliably perform microscopy of a blood smear.

*The retake exam must be scheduled as needed according to the availability of both the student and the teacher.

Qualifications

Hematology
Hematological methodology

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the laboratory examination process in its entirety, but also the thorough phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
- are familiar with laboratory examinations and are able to evaluate laboratory examination results related to blood cell disorders, acute leukemia and blood transfusion control.
- actively looks for and are able to assimilate new knowledge.
- are able to work as an expert in the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Blood cells and blood cell disorders
Bone marrow examination
Laboratory examinations and methods at blood cells disorders related to erythrocytes, leukocytes, thrombocytes

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Biosciences
Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the structure and characteristics of the different tissues.
- are able to identify fundamental tissues in figures.
- understand how the tissues influence the structure of the organs.
-have basic knowledge in histotechniques
- command terminology of histology and histotechnique.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within histology and histotechnique
- understand the importance of histology and histotechnique within bioanalysis.

Content

Tissues: structure, characteristics, influence
Histotechnique, terminology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Anatomy & physiology 1

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with their own university of applied sciences, its teaching methods, use of various platforms, and digital tools
- acquaints themselves with searching in various databases with basic literature searches in different databases
- reflects on higher education studies and are aware of the importance of the personal learning process in relation to continuous learning
- is familiar with their own education and have knowledge of their own professional field, as well as the competence requirements for their own profession

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in a higher education context
Social media, data protection, and data security
Use of AI
The importance of the profession
The work areas of nurses, public health nurses, and midwives

Location and time

Introduction to academic studies:According to schedule

Teaching methods

Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test ( library/ informationservice)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
- are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
- are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

Content

Clinical nursing methods
Ergonomics in the work
Aseptic manners
Nursing process

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Terveysportti
Vårdhandboken
Moodle material

Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

Teaching methods

Self-study
On-campus teaching
Individual works
practical exercises at KTC - Compulsory attendance

Exam schedules

Autumn 2024

Completion alternatives

Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% for practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes
Approved submissions.

Student workload

27h/ECT

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The examination is graded 0-5
Written exercises are assessed UK/GK
Clinical exercises are assessed UK/GK

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have knowledge of microbiology, immunology and pathology to be able to use relevant sources of information and scientific literature and to communicate with colleagues
- acts appropriately in care situations
- understands the principles of methodology, diagnostics and bioanalytics

Content

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- master fundamental skills of laboratory work; laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
- are able to use basic laboratory equipment
- are able to work in the laboratory carefully and systematically based on method descriptions and safety regulations
- have fundamental insights into qualitative and quantitative analyses
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- are able to calculate contents and manufacture solutions
- have fundamental insights into organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography
- consider occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
The use of basic laboratory equipment
Organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- command the fundamental skills of laboratory work; laboratory equipment, safety and methodology.
- are able to use basal laboratory equipment.
- are able to work in the laboratory carefully and systematically based on method descriptions and security regulations.
- have fundamental insights into qualitative and quantitative analyses.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- are able to calculate contents and manufacture solutions.
- have fundamental insights into organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
The use of basic laboratory equipment
Organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

spring 2025, Alere

Materials

Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848

Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
Rekommenderad litteratur:
Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar
armacology distributed by the teacher

Teaching methods

workshops and seminars
tasks and tests

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Task passed not approved
test 0-5 scale

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with genetic disease, and the Finnish disease heritage
- have insights into the analysis of genes and cells in relation to different organ diseases.
- have profound knowledge about molecular biological methods
- command the clinical terminology of molecular biology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within molecular biological bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Genetic disease
The Finnish disease heritage
Molecular biological methods
Clinical terminology of molecular biology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Cell biology
Molecular Biology

Objective

The students
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system

Content

Terminology
Cells, tissues, integumentary system
Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
Support- and movement organs

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 16th of December 2024
Re-examination 17th of January and 7th of March 2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 22 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 59 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels

Content

The circulatory system
The lymphatic system
The respiratory system
The digestive and secretory organs
The kidneys and urinary tracts
Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 10th of March 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2023 and 23.05.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

1 cr corresponds to 27 hours work for the student
Lectures and examination 23 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 58 h

Further information

More about the course on the Moodle page

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the on-line exam and virtual tests

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

Human Physiology and Anatomy 1

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about organic chemistry, as well as chemical concepts and nomenclature
- possess knowledge of functional groups and common organic compounds as well as organic reactions
- have basic knowledge about alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, ethers, esters, amines and amides

Content

Organic chemistry
Organic compounds and reactions
Organic substances

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills in the preanalytical phase that includes patient care, preparations, equipment and material, specimen types and collection methods
- realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Clinical laboratory practical training in phlebotomy

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

37,5h/week

Teaching methods

Clinical laboratory practice with focus on preanalytical steps and phlebotomy, seminar.

Exam schedules

Mandatory attendance at ending seminar.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedules
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis 1 and 2

Objective

Objectives: The student is able to describe the laboratory services in the social and health care sector as well as understands the entire laboratory work process in patient care. With this practice the student is capable to understand the laboratory research process in clinical physiology.

Tasks during the clinical practice:
- guiding, planning, and executing sample collections,
- handling, storage, and transportation of samples,
- analyzing samples according to quality requirements and recommendations,
- using laboratory equipment in laboratory operations,
- performing quality assessment
- evaluate the reliability of laboratory results and participate in the reporting of laboratory tests
- assess their own professional development
- implement the principles of sustainable development in laboratory operations.

Content

Clinical work practice in clinical physiology and neurophysiology as well as nuclear medicine.
The course is aimed at open UAS students who have applied for licensure from Valvira for their previous degree but need to complete an internship in Finland.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Fimlab https://fimlab.fi/
Vaasa Central Hospital https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti

Teaching methods

Objectives: The student is able to describe the laboratory services in the social and health care sector as well as understands the entire laboratory work process in patient care. With this practice the student is capable to understand the laboratory research process in clinical physiology.

Student workload

The student works at the practice organisation 37,5 h / week. Additionally 2,5 h / week is for assignments during practice (selfstudies).

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Mandatory attendance 100%
Approved practice assignments.
Documentation: Work certificate and signed working list.

Approved practice from clinical supervisor and course responsible teacher.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Mandatory attendance 100%
Approved practice assignments.
Documentation: Work certificate and signed working list.

Approved practice from clinical supervisor and course responsible teacher.

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis 2
Physiological and Neurophysiological Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

Content

Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Location and time

Autumn 2024
Klinisk laboratoriepraktik inom provtagning, klinisk biokemi, klinisk hematologi, transfusionsmedicn, klinisk mikrobiologi, histopatologi och cytologi, klinisk fysiologi, nuklearmedicin, neurofysiologi

Materials

See Moodle for more information.

Teaching methods

Supervised internship 8 weeks.
Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

Exam schedules

Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

International connections

Students can practice abroad.

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

The student must be at the internship site 37,5h per week and an additional 2,5 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 37,5h in the field.

Internship seminar 3 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team/student group

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Assessment methods and criteria

In order to pass the course, students must

- participated in practice information,
- have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the course,
- all practical assignments must be approved,
- participated in practical seminar &
- practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

Qualifications

Clinical Laboratory Methodology

Objective

The students
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

Content

Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Location and time

Autumn 2024
Klinisk laboratoriepraktik inom provtagning, klinisk biokemi, klinisk hematologi, transfusionsmedicn, klinisk mikrobiologi, histopatologi och cytologi, klinisk fysiologi, nuklearmedicin, neurofysiologi

Materials

See Moodle for more information.

Teaching methods

Supervised internship 8 weeks.
Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

Exam schedules

Internship seminar, Mandatory attendance

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

The student must be at the internship site 37,5h per week and an additional 2,5 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 37,5h in the field.

Internship seminar 3 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team/student group

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Assessment methods and criteria

In order to pass the course, students must

- participated in practice information,
- have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the course,
- all practical assignments must be approved,
- participated in practical seminar &
- practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

Qualifications

Clinical Laboratory Methodology

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the laboratory examination process in its entirety, but also the thorough phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
- are familiar with laboratory examinations and are able to evaluate laboratory examination results related to blood cell disorders, acute leukemia and blood transfusion control.
- actively looks for and are able to assimilate new knowledge.
- are able to work as an expert in the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Blood cells and blood cell disorders
Bone marrow examination
Laboratory examinations and methods at blood cells disorders related to erythrocytes, leukocytes, thrombocytes

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Biosciences
Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

spring 2025, Alere

Materials

Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848

Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
Rekommenderad litteratur:
Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar
armacology distributed by the teacher

Teaching methods

workshops and seminars
tasks and tests

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Task passed not approved
test 0-5 scale

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 28.5.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination x h, self studies and digital teaching methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills in the preanalytical phase that includes patient care, preparations, equipment and material, specimen types and collection methods
- realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Clinical laboratory practical training in phlebotomy

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

37,5h/week

Teaching methods

Clinical laboratory practice with focus on preanalytical steps and phlebotomy, seminar.

Exam schedules

Mandatory attendance at ending seminar.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedules
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis 1 and 2

Objective

The students
- have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
- understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

Content

Hemostaseology
Immunhematology

Location and time

Virtual (Moodle) course.
Course is open in XX-XX.

Materials

Murphy, M. F. et al., Practical Transfusion Medicine, 2017.

McCullough, J. Transfusion Medicine, 2016.

Reid, M. E., et al. The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 2012.


Finnish red cross, Blood Service: https://www.veripalvelu.fi/en/

SWE:
Gahrton & Juliusson 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
Finlands röda kors blodtjänst. Blod- och plasmaprodukter. Senaste upplaga på FRKB:s hemsida. Helsingfors
Handbok för blodprodukter 2021 (Blodtjänsten)
SPR Blodtjänsten: https://www.blodtjanst.fi/

FIN:
Porkka, Lassila, Remes m fl. 2015. Veritaudit. Duodecim. Helsinki

Teaching methods

Virtual (Moodle) course.

Student workload

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis

Further information

Content:

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis


The purpose of the course is for students to:

- Gain insights into the hemostasis mechanism/coagulation process.
- Acquire fundamental knowledge in blood group serology and transfusion medicine.
- Develop basic understanding of clinical laboratory investigations related to these topics.
- Familiarize themselves with the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment approaches for the most common diseases within the focus areas of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Students:

- Have insights into the coagulation process and blood transfusion theory.
- Possess fundamental knowledge of clinical laboratory investigations and the investigative process related to these.
- Are familiar with the terminology in hemostasis and immunohematology.
- Know central sources of information within this field.
- Understand the significance of hemostasis and immunohematology in clinical laboratory analysis

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
- can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

Content

Presentation of Thesis
Opponentship
Maturity test based on the thesis work and written expression

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Week 21 of Spring 2025 and week x of Fall 2025

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Written thesis
Seminar

Employer connections

Presentation of thesis in public

Exam schedules

Spring 2025 week 21 presentation of thesis and maturity exam
Fall 2025 week x

Completion alternatives

Thesis
Maturity test

Further information

More information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is graded 0-5
Opposition of another student's work passed or failed
Maturity test is graded passed or failed

Qualifications

Theoretical studies
Basic practice courses

Objective

The students
-are familiar with the examination and assessment of peripheral blood smears in connection to different factors that affect the blood cell morphology, and to different illnesses (anemias, infections, other benign conditions, myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative conditions, MDS and leukemias).
-are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
-are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Examination and assessment of normal and pathological peripheral blood smears

Location and time

Spring 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

Perifeerisen veren morfologiaa https://www.terveysportti.fi/apps/dtk/ltk/article/ima02248

Soluvisa https://kivikaarre.fi/soluvisa/

Teaching methods

Lessons, discussion, microscopy

Student workload

1 sp = 27 h work
3 sp = 81 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment Criteria for Practical Examination:

1. Preparation and Technique
- Correct preparation of the blood smear
- Handling of the microscope
2. Accuracy in Cell Counting
- Correct identification and counting of 100/200 leukocytes
- Accuracy in distinguishing between different types of leukocytes
3. Documentation of Results
4. Analysis and Interpretation
- Ability to analyze and interpret the results
- Understanding of any deviations and their clinical significance

Content scheduling

1. Introduction and Basic Principles (Reptition)
Peripheral blood smears and staining
Normal blood cells and their morphology
2. Anemias, Red Side
Classification of anemias
Morphological changes in different types of anemias
Practical exercises
3. Infections and blood smear
Identification of infections in blood smears
Practical exercises
4. Myeloproliferative Disorders
Overview of myeloproliferative diseases
Morphological characteristics in blood smears
Practical exercises
5. Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Introduction to lymphoproliferative diseases
Morphological changes in lymphocytes
Practical exercises
6. Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
Definition and classification of MDS
Morphological changes in blood smears in MDS
Practical exercises
7. Acute Leukemias
Introduction to acute leukemias
Morphological characteristics in blood smears
Practical exercises
8. Practical Examination

Further information

Competencies:

Deeper insights into the assessment of peripheral blood smears in relation to various factors affecting blood cell morphology and different disease conditions.

Content:

Review and assessment of peripheral blood smears

Anemias, red side
Infection smears, other benign conditions
Myeloproliferative disorders
Lymphoproliferative disorders
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)
Acute leukemias

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Examination:

The course examination will be a practical exam. To pass the course, students must reliably perform microscopy of a blood smear.

*The retake exam must be scheduled as needed according to the availability of both the student and the teacher.

Qualifications

Hematology
Hematological methodology

Objective

Objectives: The student is able to describe the laboratory services in the social and health care sector as well as understands the entire laboratory work process in patient care. With this practice the student is capable to understand the laboratory research process in clinical physiology.

Tasks during the clinical practice:
- guiding, planning, and executing sample collections,
- handling, storage, and transportation of samples,
- analyzing samples according to quality requirements and recommendations,
- using laboratory equipment in laboratory operations,
- performing quality assessment
- evaluate the reliability of laboratory results and participate in the reporting of laboratory tests
- assess their own professional development
- implement the principles of sustainable development in laboratory operations.

Content

Clinical work practice in clinical physiology and neurophysiology as well as nuclear medicine.
The course is aimed at open UAS students who have applied for licensure from Valvira for their previous degree but need to complete an internship in Finland.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Fimlab https://fimlab.fi/
Vaasa Central Hospital https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti

Teaching methods

Objectives: The student is able to describe the laboratory services in the social and health care sector as well as understands the entire laboratory work process in patient care. With this practice the student is capable to understand the laboratory research process in clinical physiology.

Student workload

The student works at the practice organisation 37,5 h / week. Additionally 2,5 h / week is for assignments during practice (selfstudies).

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Mandatory attendance 100%
Approved practice assignments.
Documentation: Work certificate and signed working list.

Approved practice from clinical supervisor and course responsible teacher.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Mandatory attendance 100%
Approved practice assignments.
Documentation: Work certificate and signed working list.

Approved practice from clinical supervisor and course responsible teacher.

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis 2
Physiological and Neurophysiological Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- command the fundamental skills of laboratory work; laboratory equipment, safety and methodology.
- are able to use basal laboratory equipment.
- are able to work in the laboratory carefully and systematically based on method descriptions and security regulations.
- have fundamental insights into qualitative and quantitative analyses.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- are able to calculate contents and manufacture solutions.
- have fundamental insights into organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
The use of basic laboratory equipment
Organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
- are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.

Content

First aid
Health care in case of emergency

Location and time

spring 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

The student:
- shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
- is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
- has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
- is aware of cultural differences in international context

Content

English (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

Teaching methods

Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

More information on Moodle.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Performed presentation, written exam.

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 hours

Content scheduling

-

Further information

Active participation is required.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The students
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels

Content

The circulatory system
The lymphatic system
The respiratory system
The digestive and secretory organs
The kidneys and urinary tracts
Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 10th of March 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2023 and 23.05.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

1 cr corresponds to 27 hours work for the student
Lectures and examination 23 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 58 h

Further information

More about the course on the Moodle page

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the on-line exam and virtual tests

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

Human Physiology and Anatomy 1

Objective

The students
- are familiar with human cells in the blood and the organs that produce blood (blood production - development and regulation.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests and the examination process connected to it.
- are familiar with the terminology of hematology.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within hematology.
- understand the importance of hematology within bioanalysis.

Content

Blood cells, blood-forming organs
Lab tests
Terminology

Materials

Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. J. P. Greer, D. A. Arber, et. al.;
Chapter 1: Examination of the Blood and Bone
Chapter 2: Clinical Flow Cytometry
Section 1 Hematopoiesis
Section 3 Granulocytes and Monocytes
Section 4 The Lymphocytes

Wintrobe's Atlas of Clinical Hematology. B. Weksler.;
Chapter 1 Approach to the Microscopic evaluation of Blood and Bone Marrow

Practical Flow Cytometry in Haematology Diagnosis. M. Leach, M. Drummond, and A. Doig.;
Principles of Flow Cytometry, Limitations, Normal Blood and Bone Marrow Populations


Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with genetic disease, and the Finnish disease heritage
- have insights into the analysis of genes and cells in relation to different organ diseases.
- have profound knowledge about molecular biological methods
- command the clinical terminology of molecular biology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within molecular biological bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Genetic disease
The Finnish disease heritage
Molecular biological methods
Clinical terminology of molecular biology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Cell biology
Molecular Biology

Objective

The students
- have fundamental insights into molecules that constitute living organisms
- have fundamental insights into biochemical processes
- master biochemical terminology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to biochemistry
- understand the importance of biochemistry in regard to bioanalysis

Content

Biochemical processes
Terminology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to the scedule

Materials

Nelson & Cox. Lehninger Principles of biochemistry. 8th edition. Macmillan 2021
Bruce Alberts, Karen Hopkin, Alexander Johnson, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter. Essential Cell Biology 2019
Erlanson-Albertsson & Gullberg. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 14.03.2025
Re-examination 04.04.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have knowledge of microbiology, immunology and pathology to be able to use relevant sources of information and scientific literature and to communicate with colleagues
- acts appropriately in care situations
- understands the principles of methodology, diagnostics and bioanalytics

Content

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have profound insights into biochemical bioanalysis.
- are familiar with medication analysis, toxicological examinations and the determination of tumour markers, porphyrins, vitamines and tracers, and know the diseases connected to these examinations.
- understand the role of laboratory results and result interpretation within biochemical bioanalytics.
- command the terminology within clinical biochemistry.
- are able to plan a clinical biochemical laboratory examination.
- are familiar with the laboratory work process in its entirety, but also its phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical.
- are able to use sources of information and scientific publications that are central to the field, concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within biochemical bioanalysis.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)
Clinical toxicology
Homones and brain-specific molecules
Porphyrins, vitamins, minerals and trace elements
Methodology: Mass spectrometry, NMR and enzymology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to schedule

Materials

Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. Burtis, Burns. 7th or 8th ed. Elsevier
Research articles
Material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, literature studies, written assignments

Exam schedules

Deadline for assignments

Completion alternatives

Exam

Student workload

3 cr corresponds to 81 hours of studies

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Assignments are graded 0-5.
Mandatory presence at discussions

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Assignments are inadequate. The student did not participate in the discussions.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The extent of the assignments are weak. The student´s participation in the discussions was weak.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The extent of the assignments are weak. The student´s participation in the discussions was weak.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The extent of the assignments are weak. The student´s participation in the discussions was excellent.

Qualifications

Biosciences

Objective

The students
- understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
- are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
- have insights into the research process and problem solution.
- are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
- command scientific ducumentation.
- are able to produce, present and defend a scientific work.
- are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
- are able to critically evaluate their own activities.

Content

Producing research work
Supervision of thesis work

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Employer connections

Topic for thesis.

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at the Mid-seminar according to schedual

Student workload

27 h/cr corresponds to 162 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Passed:
The structure of the thesis is according to instructions.
The background is relevant and informative, and motivates the choice of research topic
The aim and research questions have a clear delimitation
The collection of data material and the analysis of the data is ongoing
The references are relevant and relates to the aim and research questions
The list of references are done correctly according to instructions given for writing a thesis

Further information

Thesis plan should be accepted before the student take part of the Mid-seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Students follow the instructions for the mid-seminar.
The data collection must be completed and the data analysis started for passing.
Those who cannot participate (or have not progressed far enough in the EA process) will receive a passed grade when the completed thesis is presented.

Qualifications

Theoretical studies
Basic practice courses

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the structure and characteristics of the different tissues.
- are able to identify fundamental tissues in figures.
- understand how the tissues influence the structure of the organs.
-have basic knowledge in histotechniques
- command terminology of histology and histotechnique.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within histology and histotechnique
- understand the importance of histology and histotechnique within bioanalysis.

Content

Tissues: structure, characteristics, influence
Histotechnique, terminology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Anatomy & physiology 1

Objective

The students
- have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
- are familiar with quality development and management
- realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in the preanalytical phase

Content

Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
Reference range, type of specimen
Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
Occupational safety, legislation
Laboratory equipment
Specimen collection procedures
Performing capillary puncture
Different aspects of sustainable development
Microbiological, cytological specimens,
Venipuncture
Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
Specimen handling and storage

Location and time

Spring 2025
University of Applied Science, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Miettinen, M., & Rusanen, S. (2022). Näytteenottajan käsikirja (3., uudistettu painos.). Edita.

Friman, T., Kuparinen, M., Lehto, L., Liikanen, E., & Kivisalmi, V. (2021). Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (1. painos.). Byrettikustannus avoin yhtiö.

Ericson, E., Ericson, T., & Kan, B. (2018). Klinisk mikrobiologi: Infektioner, immunologi, vårdhygien (5 upplagan.). Liber.

Lund-Egloff, D., & Löwbeer, C. (2014). Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (1. uppl.). Studentlitteratur.

Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.

Student workload

5 sp Total 135 h
Mandatory attendance.

Content scheduling

1. Introduction to Laboratory Operations
- Laboratory operations and sampling process
- Laboratory examinations in relation to the patient’s overall care
2. Reference Values and Sample Material
- Biochemical Laboratory Examinations: Proteins & Carbohydrates; Lipids, electrolytes & cardiac markers
- Hematological examinations
3. Patient Preparation and Preanalytical Factors
- Patient preparation
- Preanalytical factors
4. Other Sampling Methods
- Microbiological sampling
- Cytological sampling
- EKG and urine sampling

**Practical Exercises: Venous and capillary blood sampling, microbiological sampling, EKG

Further information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved Practical Exam.
Mandatory participation in Practical Exercises.

The student should be familiar with the most common examinations in clinical chemistry, clinical microbiology, and clinical physiology. The student can prepare and guide the patient before sampling and can observe the patient’s condition after sampling.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- master fundamental skills of laboratory work; laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
- are able to use basic laboratory equipment
- are able to work in the laboratory carefully and systematically based on method descriptions and safety regulations
- have fundamental insights into qualitative and quantitative analyses
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- are able to calculate contents and manufacture solutions
- have fundamental insights into organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography
- consider occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
The use of basic laboratory equipment
Organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
- are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
- have insights into the research process and problem solution.
- are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
- command scientific documentation.
- are able to present and defend a scientific work.
- are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
- are able to critically evaluate their own activities.
- are able to produce research plan

Content

Introduction to thesis
Production of research plan and presentaion
Producing research work
Supervision of thesis work

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

According to the topic of Thesis

Recommended literature: Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Introduction lecture to the course, thesis work, followed by mainly self-directed studies with possibility to supervision. The student makes a plan for the thesis. The presentation of the plan for the thesis is the examination

Employer connections

The Thesis can be a work ordered, but is not necessary always so

Exam schedules

Presentation of work plan for thesis autumn 2024 and presentation of the thesis in May 2025

Completion alternatives

No optional examination form

Student workload

The course is 3 cr which is equivalent to 81 h work for the student

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

If the thesis plan is done according to instructions it is assessed as passed.

Further information

The content of the work plan for thesis:
Novia titlepage
Table of content
Introduction
Background (description of the topic, at least 5-6 scientific studies)
Aim and problem definition
Method (Data collection based on 2 references/discuss method of selection)
Ethical consideration (based on references)
Timetable
Reference list
Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis)

1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle (no key needed)
2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest of studying it.
4. Background shall be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters where description of concepts and the topic of the subject. In the background you also describe the previous research done
5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
6. The method can be described on 2-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. refer to relevant documents on Finnish National advicory board on Research Integrity TENK. (tenk.fi)
8. Time plan should estimate how Thesis proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
9. Works cited

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The work plan for the thesis is assessed as either failed or passed.

The plan must include the following parts (for passing):
• Novia cover page
• Table of contents
• Introduction (at least 1 page): must include at least 2 sources
• Purpose and research questions
• Background (at least 4 pages). Must include: for one student: at least 6 sources, of which at least 2 are scientific and for two students: at least 9 sources, of which at least 4 are scientific
• Method (at least 1 page): Selection; Data collection; Data analysis method; Ethical considerations and Timeline
• References (of the sources used in the plan)

Length: at least 6 pages and at most 9 pages (excluding cover page, table of contents, and references)

Must follow Novia's writing guidelines: https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/

Qualifications

Theoretical studies
Basic practice courses

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
- are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
- are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

Content

Clinical nursing methods
Ergonomics in the work
Aseptic manners
Nursing process

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Terveysportti
Vårdhandboken
Moodle material

Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

Teaching methods

Self-study
On-campus teaching
Individual works
practical exercises at KTC - Compulsory attendance

Exam schedules

Autumn 2024

Completion alternatives

Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% for practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes
Approved submissions.

Student workload

27h/ECT

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The examination is graded 0-5
Written exercises are assessed UK/GK
Clinical exercises are assessed UK/GK

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
- understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
- have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
- are familiar with quality development and management
-realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- see its role and responsibility as a professional to work for global sustainable social development

Content

Health care and social welfare in Finland
Different organizations
Different aspects of sustainable development
Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
Reference range, type of specimen
Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
Occupational safety, legislation
Laboratory equipment
Specimen collection procedures
Performing capillary puncture
Microbiological, cytological specimens,
Venipuncture
Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
Specimen handling and storage

Location and time

Autumn 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)

Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)

Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)

An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).

Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).

More material provided on Moodle.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None