•   Diagnostic Radiography 1 RAD22ST03-3002 02.09.2024-30.03.2025  7 credits  (URS24D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student
    - understand the operating principles of X-ray tubes and generator, the origin of X-rays and have thorough insights into imaging techniques and the use of X-ray apparatus for conventional examinations
    - has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
    - conducts basic projection learning and can be the basic principles for planning, performing and evaluating nativity studies
    - has basic knowledge of pathological findings.
    - has basic knowledge of ultrasound technology and is familiar with various surveys; preparation, implementation and aftercare.
    - has good insights into different types of X-ray equipment for examining the theet and jaws.
    - can apply an aseptic way of working and have knowledge of infectious diseases and insulation principles
    - understands the importance of good patient experience and safe patient care
    - can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation
    Prerequisites
    Introduction to clinical radiography
    Content of the study unit
    -x-ray tubes and generators
    -imaging techniques for conventinal examinations
    -anatomy
    -basics in projection learning and criteria for good x-ray examination
    -Ultrasound
    -x-rays of theeth
    -Aseptic and infectious diseases
    -Ethics
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Failed the exam, unsubmitted mandatory tasks and assignments.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Carina Gädda

    Learning material

    Companies, pp presentations, see Moodle
    Radiology (2022) L. Blomqvist and S. Zackrisson.
    Patient care in radiography: with an introduction to medical imaging. (2017) Ehrlich, Ruth Ann, author ; Coakes, Dawn M., author. Elsevier, Ninth edition
    Radiography of children : a guide to good practice (2004) Hardwick, Judith ; Gold, Catherine. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone
    HUS-Hyvän kuvan kriteritit
    Regulations
    Recommendations
    Current research
    Websites

    Learning methods

    Lectures, clinical exercises, discussion

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Passed the exam, passed mandatory assignments and exercises
    Active participation can affect course grades. According to the supervisors, absences can be supplemented

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    02.09.2024 - 30.03.2025

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 24.09.2024

    Group(s)
    • URS24D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Heidi Kronqvist, Carina Gädda

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Examination - according to agreement
    written submissions - according to agreement
    exercise tasks - according to agreement

    Timing and attendance

    During autumn 24 and spring 25

    Student's schedule and workload

    27 h/c

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Failed the exam, unsubmitted mandatory tasks and assignments.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Criteria for evaluating the exam
    Students have superficial knowledge of the subject (reading by heart)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    Students have followed the instructions for the written work. Has deficient knowledge of the substance and is not familiar with it and has deficient knowledge of other people's written works.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluating the exam
    Students can give an account of the literature, reflect and justify their opinions

    Assessment criteria for written work
    Students have followed the instructions for written work and master the substance of their work, but the application is limited. Has insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written works.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Criteria for evaluating the exam
    Students demonstrate in-depth knowledge and maturity within the subject

    Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for written work and shows that she has mastered the material. Is well-read in the other participants' written works, can ask relevant questions and lead a seminar discussion. The written work and possible opposition demonstrate excellent knowledge. (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working method)