•   Patient-centered care in clinical radiography RAD22SM04-3001 01.01.2024-30.04.2024  7 credits  (URS22D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student
    - has ability to meet and take care of patients in all ages, with any cultural background in her/his own context
    -can handle different kind of patient situations and has the ability to guide the patient
    - have knowledge of welfare technology solutions and the use of AI in clinical radiography
    Prerequisites
    None
    Content of the study unit
    - Geriatric
    - Pediatric
    - Social psychology
    - Cultural competence
    - Pedagogy
    - Welfare technology
    - AI
    - Sustainable Development
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
    The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

    Assessment criteria for written work 
    The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
    Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

    Assessment criteria for written work 
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
    Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Carina Gädda

    Learning material

    Literature is presented in Moodle

    Learning methods

    Lectures
    Problem solving
    Self studies
    Individual work
    Groupwork

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Socialpsycology (u/gk)
    Geriatric 2 cr (0-5)
    Multicultural work 1,3 cr (0-5)
    Pediatric 1,5 cr
    Nursing Pedagogy 0,5
    Health Technology and AI 1 cr

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    01.01.2024 - 30.04.2024

    Enrollment date range

    01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

    Group(s)
    • URS22D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Heidi Kronqvist, Carina Gädda

    Additional information

    Mandatory attendance at lessons in workshops and seminars



    In this course Moodle is the platform where al the material is.



    Verval or written feedback

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    The course is examined through smaller written assignments/group work. All information is submitted no later than the end of the course.
    Written Examination 7.5.2024
    Retake 24.5, 13.9

    Timing and attendance

    Spring term 2024
    Introduction to course is online, 3 cp self-studies

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 cr = 27 h
    7 cr = 189 h

    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam (1-2)
    The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

    Assessment criteria for written work 
    The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam  (3-4)
    Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

    Assessment criteria for written work 
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam (5)
    Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)