Academic year 2024 - 2025

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3039 26.08.2024-31.12.2024  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Efter genomgången och godkänd kurs i den nationella utbildningshelheten Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap har deltagaren grundläggande kompetens och färdigheter gällande vaccinering och själva vaccinationsprocessen.
  
  Kursens innehåll:
  -Förebyggande av sjukdomar genom vaccination
  -Det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet
  -Fördelarna med vaccination
  - Information om potentiella biverkningar av vacciner
  - Vägledning och stöd till klienter baserat på forskningsbaserad kunskap
  - Grundläggande färdigheter för vaccination (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  National course in Moodle platform

  Learning methods

  Endast för Arcadas Studerande :Nationell kurs i vaccinationskunskap helt virtuellt via Novias Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 2 credits

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Portfolio + virtuell tent enligt inlämningsdeadline på Arcada (not translated)

•   Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3015 09.09.2024-08.11.2024  6 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Maria Berg, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

•   Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3016 07.10.2024-13.12.2024  6 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Carina Gädda, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h

•   Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3018 09.09.2024-08.11.2024  6 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  15 - 32

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

•   Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3014 28.10.2024-13.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete och workshops

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.10.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 27.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända individuella -och grupparbete samt tentamen (då kursen avslutas)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar

•   Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3015 02.09.2024-18.10.2024  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Inbandad introduktion till kursen på Moodle, Power Point och hänvisning till aktuella websidor på Moodle, portfolio, individuella uppgifter samt rapport på moodle.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 18.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 14.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Additional information

  Kursen är online och studierna förverkligas sjävständigt under tiden 2/9-18/10.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodle tentamen 17 /10 klockan 09.00-11.00

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar (not translated)

•   Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3016 18.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete och workshops.
  Några lektioner är online, se moodle

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända individuella -och grupparbete samt tentamen (då kursen avslutas)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar

•   Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3001 07.10.2024-17.11.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in different business environments within healthcare
  - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
  - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
  - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Care assessment
  ABCDE evaluation
  Telephone counseling
  Digital consulting
  Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  Ethics
  Sustainable Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Care Assessment:
  Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432
  
  Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630
  
  Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974
  
  Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255
  
  Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3
  
  Health technology:
  
  Nordens välfärdscenter
  https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/
  
  Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
  https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/
  
  Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
  https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-
  
  Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
  https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324
  
  Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658
  
  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z
  
  Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

  Learning methods

  lectures, group discussion and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Frida Gädda, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar and assignment
  instruction will be given in Moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS= 27 hours

  Content scheduling

  Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
  Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

  Assessment criteria

  Did not achieve any of the criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3003 09.09.2024-13.10.2024  3 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in different business environments within healthcare
  - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
  - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
  - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Care assessment
  ABCDE evaluation
  Telephone counseling
  Digital consulting
  Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  Ethics
  Sustainable Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Care Assessment:
  Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432
  
  Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630
  
  Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974
  
  Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255
  
  Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3
  
  Health technology:
  
  Nordens välfärdscenter
  https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/
  
  Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
  https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/
  
  Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
  https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-
  
  Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
  https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324
  
  Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658
  
  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z
  
  Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

  Learning methods

  lectures, group discussion and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar and assignment
  instruction will be given in Moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS= 27 hours

  Content scheduling

  Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
  Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

  Assessment criteria

  Did not achieve any of the criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Clinical Intrapartum Midwifery 1 BM18KB06-3004 09.09.2024-31.05.2025  6 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the nursing woman, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills in identifying deviations and dealing with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in cooperation with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 31.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical Midwifery During the Postnatal Period BM18KB02-3004 30.09.2024-31.08.2025  9 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during puerperium
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the mother's and the child's care during puerperium and document it according to national documentation systems
  - can work family-centered in the support of the new family
  - can create a good care relationship with the woman and her family and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within postnatal care
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in postnatal care.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 31.08.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3007 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  5 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Teori: 4 h
  Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
  Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberedande för examination.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3008 14.10.2024-01.12.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.10.2024 - 01.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 20.10.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Teori: 4 h
  Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
  Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberedande för examination.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3009 28.08.2024-11.10.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2024 - 11.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 48

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Jannica Andtfolk, Carina Gädda, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Teori: 4 h
  Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
  Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberedande för examination.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t
  Förverkligas digitalt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 4 BM18KB09-3003 01.08.2024-20.12.2024  6 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can manage the normal delivery independently
  - mastered fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - In case of deviant delivery and during risk delivery, can care for a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - Master-safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 3

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 29.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3007 02.12.2024-20.12.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.12.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3009 25.11.2024-20.12.2024  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3008 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3010 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3001 07.10.2024-22.12.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  
  The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Novia har licens att använda MOT Kielipalvelu:
  • MOT Ordböcker: 29 ordböcker; allmänna och specialordböcker
  • MOT Översättare: automatisk översättning, till 26 språk
  • MOT Språkgranskare
  • MOT Ordlistor: exempelvis ”Terveydenhuoltosanastoa”
  Mera om innehållet: https://www.sanakirja.fi/legal/our-content.
  Adressen fungerar när du är på campus, i Novias nät, medan följande adress fungerar på distans: https://www-sanakirja-fi.ezproxy.novia.fi/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Arbetsplan för examensarbete: uk-gk.
  
  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 6 sidor och max 9 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 21.08.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Enligt Novias processbeskrivning:
  "Till studier som leder till yrkeshögskoleexamen ingår ett lärdomsprov som vid Novia kallas examensarbete. Examensarbetet är en analys av ett problem från verkligheten där du kan använda de kunskaper du fått under dina studier och specialisera dig inom ett ämnesområde. Det är viktigt att slutföra en kurs i forskningsmetodik före du börjar med examensarbetet."
  
  Innebär att kurs i forskningsmetodik skall vara slutförd eller påbörjad och slutförs under processen med skrivandet av planen för examensarbetet. Motsvarande kurs i forskningsmetodik vid annan yrkeshögskola eller universitet kan beaktas.
  
  Kursen är en av tre kursdelar för examensarbetet.
  Den innebär självständigt arbete, skrivande av och feed-back av plan för examensarbete (EA). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3003 02.09.2024-22.12.2024  3 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  
  The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Novia har licens att använda MOT Kielipalvelu:
  • MOT Ordböcker: 29 ordböcker; allmänna och specialordböcker
  • MOT Översättare: automatisk översättning, till 26 språk
  • MOT Språkgranskare
  • MOT Ordlistor: exempelvis ”Terveydenhuoltosanastoa”
  Mera om innehållet: https://www.sanakirja.fi/legal/our-content.
  Adressen fungerar när du är på campus, i Novias nät, medan följande adress fungerar på distans: https://www-sanakirja-fi.ezproxy.novia.fi/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Arbetsplan för examensarbete: uk-gk.
  
  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 6 sidor och max 9 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 02.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Enligt Novias processbeskrivning:
  "Till studier som leder till yrkeshögskoleexamen ingår ett lärdomsprov som vid Novia kallas examensarbete. Examensarbetet är en analys av ett problem från verkligheten där du kan använda de kunskaper du fått under dina studier och specialisera dig inom ett ämnesområde. Det är viktigt att slutföra en kurs i forskningsmetodik före du börjar med examensarbetet."
  
  Innebär att kurs i forskningsmetodik skall vara slutförd eller påbörjad och slutförs under processen med skrivandet av planen för examensarbetet. Motsvarande kurs i forskningsmetodik vid annan yrkeshögskola eller universitet kan beaktas.
  
  Kursen är en av tre kursdelar för examensarbetet.
  Den innebär självständigt arbete, skrivande av och feed-back av plan för examensarbete (EA). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3001 25.11.2024-30.03.2025  6 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Self-studies
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium.
  Datainsamlingen skall vara gjord och dataanalysen påbörjad för gk.
  De som inte kan delta (eller kommit så långt i EA-processen) får gk i samband med att de presenterar det färdiga examensarbetet (EX03). (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 30.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 05.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen för examensarbetet (EX01) skall var godkänd innan man deltar i mellansemi. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  EX02 godkänns senast i samband med presentation av färdigt examensarbete (EX03). (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topic for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mid-seminar ccording to schedual.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 162 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad.
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete (not translated)

•   Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3002 07.10.2024-31.01.2025  6 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice
  See VÅV22UV01-3002

  Learning methods

  Individual work under supervision
  Seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. the analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 31.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 02.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun.
  Use Instructions for writing a thesis and word template available on Novia homepage

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  See Novia instructions for validation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered from a health organization

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See time schedule, seminar i January 2025

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

  Content scheduling

  October to January

•   Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3003 25.11.2024-30.03.2025  6 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Self-studies
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium.
  Datainsamlingen skall vara gjord och dataanalysen påbörjad för gk.
  De som inte kan delta (eller kommit så långt i EA-processen) får gk i samband med att de presenterar det färdiga examensarbetet (EX03). (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 30.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 24.11.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen för examensarbetet (EX01) skall var godkänd innan man deltar i mellansemi. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  EX02 godkänns senast i samband med presentation av färdigt examensarbete (EX03). (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topic for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mid-seminar according to schedual.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 162 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad.
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete (not translated)

•   Developmental Project in Midwifery BM14FU04-3008 01.08.2024-31.07.2025  5 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in midwifery

  Prerequisites

  Thesis 2

  Content of the study unit

  Developmental project in midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the chosen theme

  Learning methods

  Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The development work is evaluated 1-5
  Criteria for evaluation
  Starting point for and goal of the development work
  The theoretical foundation of development work
  Area of ​​use for the development work
  Critical review of development work, process and product

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.07.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Seats

  8 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The lectures and seminars are compulsory.
  Novia instructions for writing thesis is used
  AI is not allowed to use

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  A finished product and presentation of development project

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation of development work in November 2024 or in May 2025

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 h lecture
  4 h seminars
  128 h individual work, with supervision

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
  The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
  Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
  Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
  The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
  The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
  The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
  The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
  The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
  Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.
  
  The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
  The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
  The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
  The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation

•   Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3014 07.10.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly
  Exam in drug calculation, 100% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Group 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Group 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Group 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments
  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
  Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
  Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3015 21.10.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly
  Exam in drug calculation, 100% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 20.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Katarina Vironen

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments
  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
  Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
  Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3016 11.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14)
  eller
  Nordeng, H, och Spigset, O. 2020. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  
  Lääketietokanta, Lääkkeet ja hinnat och lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti
  eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  Molin et al 2016. Träna Läkemedelsberäkning Liber, Stockholm
  eller
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor. eller
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar på finska /engelska

  Learning methods

  seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 36

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Läkemedlesräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( mikrogram, milligram, gram Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  På engelska (not translated)

•   English VÅV22EN01-3011 11.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 10.11.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Miranda Ekholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3013 04.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 03.11.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Korhonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   First Aid and Emergency Preparedness VÅV22GV06-3014 18.11.2024-13.12.2024  2 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.11.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 11.11.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 37

  Small group(s)

  • Practise 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Practise 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3006 14.10.2024-20.12.2024  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Gynaecological Midwifery Care VÅV18KVV18-3004 30.09.2024-31.05.2025  6 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the gynecological patient's care, and document this
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in gynecological care context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Gynaecological midwifery care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in gynaecological context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 31.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3011 09.09.2024-08.11.2024  4 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självständiga studier.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 08.11.2024
  Re-examination 13.12.2024, 07.02.2025 and 09.05.2025

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3012 06.09.2024-15.11.2024  4 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2021, 2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självständiga studier.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2024 - 15.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 07.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 13.11.2024
  Re-examination 13.12.2024, 07.02.2025 and 09.05.2025

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3013 23.09.2024-22.11.2024  4 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Gunell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.09.2024 - 22.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 24.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Gunell, Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination tba
  Re-examination tba

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3007 02.09.2024-20.10.2024  5 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. (2012). Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: Online deltenter bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 20.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 30.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (GK/UK)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (GK/UK)
  Stroke (kort tent i samband med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  2 h Intro (obligatorisk närvaro)
  
  Neuro:
  3 h Strokeföreläsning
  3 h EP, MS, Parkinson & hjärntumörer
  4 h Neurokirurgi och Neurobedömning workshop i A265
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz/tent läsning (26 h)
  
  MSK:
  2 h Teori
  4 h Reuma + Artros föreläsning
  6 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro
  2 h Tent
  Självstudier (33 h): tent, korsord och uppgift om amputationer
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  4 h Workshop Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz (14 h)
  
  Hema:
  Självstudier (se Moodle = 20 h) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3008 30.09.2024-17.11.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. (2012). Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: Online deltenter bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 22.09.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (GK/UK)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (GK/UK)
  Stroke (kort tent i samband med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  2 h Intro (obligatorisk närvaro)
  
  Neuro:
  3 h Strokeföreläsning
  3 h EP, MS, Parkinson & hjärntumörer
  4 h Neurokirurgi och Neurobedömning workshop i A265
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz/tent läsning (26 h)
  
  MSK:
  2 h Teori
  4 h Reuma + Artros föreläsning
  6 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro
  2 h Tent
  Självstudier (33 h): tent, korsord och uppgift om amputationer
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  4 h Workshop Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz (14 h)
  
  Hema:
  Självstudier (se Moodle = 20 h) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3009 02.09.2024-06.10.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. (2012). Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: Online deltenter bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 06.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 30.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (0-5)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (0-5)
  Stroke (kort tent i samband med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  2 h Intro-online (obligatorisk närvaro)
  
  Neuro:
  4 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  4 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  2 h Workshop (Neurobedömning och -övervakning), Obligatorisk närvaro
  
  MSK:
  2 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro (samma dag som Neurobedömning och -övervakning, samt sinnesorganen)
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro
  
  Hema:
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Intrapartum Midwifery 2 BM21BM08-3001 09.09.2024-30.05.2025  3 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge about birth complications
  - has the skills to support the parents during a birth with complications
  - has knowledge and ability to deal with care during childbirth complications individually and together with other professional groups
  - has knowledge of and can apply fetal monitoring
  - can and understand the importance of documentation during childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of safe working methods in maternity care

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen et al, Kätilötyö
  Lindgren et al, Reproduktiv hälsa.
  Backenbottenutbildning.se
  ctg-utbildning.se
  Käypähoito
  Vårdhandboken
  Moodle course Änglatröst
  Articles according to the lecturers' instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions
  Moodle course Änglatröst
  Bäckenbottenutbildning.se
  ctg-utbildning.se
  Practical skills training, simulations
  Individual assignments
  Clinical Examination
  Written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, the following are required:
  Certificate of completed course "Bäckenbottenutbildning" and "ctg-utbildning"
  Approved written exam
  Approved clinical examination
  Presence at all mandatory lessons
  
  General feedback on exam answers is given to the whole class at the same time, for individual feedback the teacher is contacted.
  Feedback on practical skills is given directly in the situation.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 30.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2024 - 06.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  External lecturer:
  Gynecologist Päivi Kivelä - ctg
  Hospital chaplain Ann-Sofi Nylund
  
  Mandatory attendance at course introduction, clinical simulations and at lessons with external lecturers

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam
  Clinical examination
  CTG-utbildning.se
  Bäckenbottenutbildning.se

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  week 22 in spring 2025

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr, 3 cr = 81 h

•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication VÅV22IN01-3015 02.09.2024-20.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Communication:
  Novia's instructions for degree projects.
  Materials on Moodle
  
  Introduction: Materials on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Communication - Swedish 3 cr:
  - Lectures on scientific writing
  - Lectures on oral presentation
  - Group work in scientific writing
  - Exercises in oral presentation
  - Oral presentations that are analyzed
  
  Introduction to academic studies 1 cr: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test. More course information can be found in Moodle platform

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist, Anna Korhonen, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.
  
  Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Content scheduling

  Kommunikation för sjukskötare 3 sp:
  - Vetenskapligt skrivande på svenska samt litteratursökning manuellt och i databaser
  - Tillförlitligt källmaterial och källkritik
  - Muntlig och skriftlig framställning
  - E-post hantering och användning av sociala medier i vårdarbetet
  
  Introduktion till högskolestudier 1sp:
  - Studieinformation och informationssökning
  - Lärande i ett högskolesammanhang
  - Dataskydd och datasäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student do not have a sufficient knowledge and competence about the topic.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
  Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
  • Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
  • Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
  • Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication VÅV22IN01-3017 02.09.2024-11.10.2024  4 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Communication
  Novia's instructions for degree projects.
  Materials on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Communication: Swedish 3 cr
  - Lectures on scientific writing
  - Lectures on oral presentation
  - Group work in scientific writing
  - Exercises in oral presentation
  - Oral presentations that are analyzed
  
  Introduction to academic studies 1 cr:
  - Lecturers, presentations,
  - Virtual on line test.
  - Virtual test ( library )
  
  More course information can be found on Moodle platform

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Communication
  
  Student
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way, in accordance with the requirements of working life and social life.
  knows the work process of scientific writing and can use referencing systems.
  - is aware of different ways to search for information and can report according to the rules for standard reporting.
  Students with Finnish as the language of schooling must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required of public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should demonstrate satisfactory (grade 1-3) or good (grade 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written skills are assessed separately.
  Prerequisites
  No prior knowledge requirements

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 11.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Anna Korhonen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Introduction to university studies 1 cr:
  Study information and information search
  Learning in a university context
  Data protection and data security
  
  Communication for midwives/public health nurses 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature searches manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  E-mail handling and use of social media in care work

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.
  
  Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

  Student's schedule and workload

  One (1) credit corresponds to 27 hours of work for the student.
  This course is 4 credits which means 108 hours of work for this course.
  
  The course is divided according to:
  3 credits Communication/Swedish (Language teacher)
  1 ECTS Introduction (Marie Hjortell and Terese Österberg)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:
  Underkänd
  Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
  Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
  • Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
  • Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
  • Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication VÅV22IN01-3016 02.09.2024-20.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Communication:
  Novia's instructions for degree projects.
  Materials on Moodle
  
  Introduction: Materials on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Communication - Swedish 3 cr:
  - Lectures on scientific writing
  - Lectures on oral presentation
  - Group work in scientific writing
  - Exercises in oral presentation
  - Oral presentations that are analyzed
  
  Introduction to academic studies 1 cr: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test. More course information can be found in Moodle platform

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 13.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.
  
  Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Content scheduling

  Kommunikation för sjukskötare 3 sp:
  - Vetenskapligt skrivande på svenska samt litteratursökning manuellt och i databaser
  - Tillförlitligt källmaterial och källkritik
  - Muntlig och skriftlig framställning
  - E-post hantering och användning av sociala medier i vårdarbetet
  
  Introduktion till högskolestudier 1sp:
  - Studieinformation och informationssökning
  - Lärande i ett högskolesammanhang
  - Dataskydd och datasäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student do not have a sufficient knowledge and competence about the topic.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
  Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
  • Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
  • Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
  • Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

•   Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22KV12-3002 25.11.2024-12.01.2025  6 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of and an understanding of the most common forms of mental illness
  - has knowledge of and masters the various treatment and care methods of mental health care
  - can assess the need for care in people in need of emergency psychiatric care
  - can define risk use, harmful use / abuse, addiction and co-dependence
  - has knowledge of various forms of abuse; mainly alcohol, drugs and medicines
  - has knowledge of various forms of treatment and psycho social care
  - has the skills to intervene in time, inform, give advice and guide the client and relatives in substance abuse issues
  - understands the importance of health promotion and prevention interventions and care as well as rehabilitation in mental illness and in addiction and dependence
  - can interpret the central legislation and the national planning for the area and can apply the knowledge in professional practice
  - masters the medical terminology and drug treatment in the field
  - can interact professionally and caringly with clients / patients of different ages and with varying backgrounds and with their relatives
  - respects the patient / client and treats them as an expert on their own life
  - can support and guide the client / patient and relatives to get involved in care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Mental illness
  Addiction and addiction

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  42% Face-to-face, 58% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Allgulander, C. 2019. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Lindqvist B. & Hildebrand Karlén. 2023. Handbok i missbruks- och beroendepsykologi, Liber, Stockholm
  Lagstiftning
  Medibas
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 12.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 24.11.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid Introduktion, Workshop, Seminarie (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Neonatal Care and Breastfeeding Counselling BM21BM07-3001 02.09.2024-31.01.2025  4 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of neonatal care
  - can predict, identify and intervene in the case of abnormalities in the newborn
  - mastered follow-up and care of sick newborns
  - can provide support, advice and guidance for parents with sick newborns
  - have readiness to provide breastfeeding counselling

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care

  Content of the study unit

  Neonatal care
  Breastfeeding counselling

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to the lecturer's instructions in breastfeeding councelling
  
  Neonatalcare:
  Neonatal care: Selected parts from:
  Fellman, V., Luukainen, P. & Asikainen, T. 2018. Vastasyntyneiden tehohoito. Oppaan uusin kirjaversio, 3 uudistettu painos. Duodecim, Helsinki. (This book is also available in its entirety at Terveysportti.)
  Iivanainen, A & Syväoja, P. 2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki. Pages 146 - 151
  Lagercrantz, H., Hellström-Westas, L. & Norman, M. (Eds.) 2015. Neonatology, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Lundqvist, P. (Eds.). 2013. Nursing of the newborn child. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Practical training
  Duties
  Demonstrations
  Case
  Videos

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 31.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Vasa - timlärare Vård, Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at all contact teaching ( breast feeding councelling) in order to receive a certificate of approved breastfeeding tutor training
  During internship also 5 recorded breastfeeding instruction sessions

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exercise during the course in breastfeeding councelling, grade 1-5
  
  Examination
  Completed web training with passed knowledge test: https://neohlrutbildning.se/index.php

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examnination
  Exam 1
  Exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3004 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Introduction lecture - compulsory
  Work shop -Escape Game- Compulsory

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Case study is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study
  Online Exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 c =27h
  2 c =54

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3005 25.11.2024-20.12.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Online recorded lectures

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individual cas study graded 0-5
  Reflection Pass/Fail
  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-1
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Moodle opens 25.11
  The course closes 20.12

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr= 27h
  2 cr= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3006 14.10.2024-15.11.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Online recorded lectures

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individual cas study graded 0-5
  Reflection Pass/Fail
  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.10.2024 - 15.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Moodle opens 14.10
  The course closes 15.11

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr= 27h
  2 cr= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3006 02.09.2024-06.10.2024  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 06.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr = 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  8+8 h practical in operation room
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3007 07.10.2024-17.11.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr = 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  8+8 h practical in operation room
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3008 02.09.2024-04.10.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti
  
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar

  Learning methods

  Introduction online and other theorylessons recorded, demonstrationfilms, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 04.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 03.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr= 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 2
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Practice: Basic Care VÅV22PR01-3014 09.12.2024-07.02.2025  7 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se Moodle för närmare information:
  - eventuella hälsogranskningar, prov och vaccinationer
  - praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice 6 ects
  Patient Safety 1 ects

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.12.2024 - 07.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance during practice.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Godkänd praktik
  Godkända praktikuppgifter
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium
  Godkänd webbutbildning kring patientsäkerhet
  Deltagande vid föreläsning och framförande om patientsäkerhet
  
  
  1 sp = 27 h (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande:
  - kan under handledning planera, förverkliga och utvärdera grundvård
  - kan tillämpa evidensbaserade metoder inom grundvården
  - kan visa kollegialitet och påvisa medarbetarkompetens
  - an arbeta i interprofessionella team
  - kan professionellt bemöta patienter och närstående
  - kan handleda patienter inom grundvården
  - kan under handledning utföra en säker läkemedelsbehandling
  - förstår vikten av patient- och klientsäkerhet
  - behärskar den centrala kunskapsbasen för patient- och klientsäkerhet
  - kan främja patientsäkerheten och förebygga risksituationer (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h (not translated)

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3007 07.10.2024-08.12.2024  10 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 08.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM23D-V
  • UHV23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Frida Gädda

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3008 04.11.2024-02.02.2025  10 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.11.2024 - 02.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 10.11.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  1 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Frida Gädda

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3009 23.09.2024-01.12.2024  10 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.09.2024 - 01.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 22.09.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Frida Gädda

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3010 04.11.2024-26.01.2025  10 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.11.2024 - 26.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 03.11.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22PR05-3003 07.10.2024-08.12.2024  9 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - applies evidence-based knowledge in the psychiatric and substance abuse care context
  - identifies and interprets the patient's / client's problems regarding mental illness and substance abuse / addiction
  - creates an understanding for the client / patient, shows respect and treats him as an expert on his own life
  - assesses, plans, implements, evaluates and documents the patient's / client's care under supervision
  - creates a good care relationship with the client / patient and relatives and demonstrates a professional approach
  - can perform a safe drug treatment
  - understands the importance of and has the ability to collaborate with different professional groups within the care team
  - has the skills and ability to provide first aid for mental illness

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
  VÅV22KV12 Mental and Substance Abuse Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Acute crisis, crisis management, treatment of victims of violence
  First aid for mental illness

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  95% Face-to-face, 5% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 08.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  0.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Workshop 2 days at CTC
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Practice: Primary care VÅV22PR04-3002 30.09.2024-01.12.2024  9 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in primary care
  - has knowledge of and understanding of patient care in the home environment
  - understands the importance of the home and relatives for the patient
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can in a professional manner treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision in different primary care contexts

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se Jobiili för att kontrollera praktikplatsens krav gällande vaccinationer, intyg
  Se Moodle gällande praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Klinisk praktik inom primärvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 01.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Research methodology and care theory VÅV22UV01-3002 02.09.2024-13.12.2024  7 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows basic knowledge and science theory
  - can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - know different research methods and how they are used
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
  - can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
  - can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
  - is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology, research process and care theory
  Qualitative methods
  Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  43% Face-to-face, 57% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Qualitative methodology:
  Alligood, M. (2022). Nursing Theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (eller tidigare upplagor)
  
  Birkler, J. (2022). Vetenskapsteori en grundbok. Stockholm: Liber.
  
  Carlsson, T. & Georgsson, S. (2021). Forsknignsetik. Ingår i Oscarsson M & Gerorgsson S. (red.). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur, s 293- 308.
  
  Forsknignsetiska delegationens dokument tenk.fi
  
  Henricson, M. red. (2023). Vetenskapliglig teori och metod. Från idé till examination inom vård och hälsovetenskaper. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (eller tidigare upplagor)
  
  Lundgren I, et al. (Eds.). (2022). Theories and perspectives for midwifery a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Wiklund Gustin, L. (2012). Omvårdnadsteorier i klinisk praxis. Natur och kultur.
  
  + annan valfri relevant litteratur.
  
  
  Quantitative methodology:
  som bredvidläsning rekommenderas Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, samt av examinator anvisad litteratur

  Learning methods

  Qualitative methods: lectures, written assignments, individual work and group work, tutorials home exam.
  
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
  
  Compulsory presence

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For written assignment 1-4 the grading is Pass/Fail
  See details in Moodle
  For home exam grades 0-5
  
  Quantiative assignment is graded 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course is arranged with midwifery students and the public health nurse students together.
  More information about content in Moodle course
  Compulsory presence on some parts mentioned in Moodle.
  
  General feedback to the whole group, individual feedback on request.
  Use Novia instructions for thesis in the assignments.
  AI is not allowed to use unless it is explicitly encouraged.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Qualitative methods:
  4 assignments pass/ fail, see more details in Moodle
  + home exam 0-5
  Validation according to Novia's general instructions.
  
  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
  
  See Novia's instructions for validation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The students make an interview on a common topic that is agree on in class.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadlines for assignments and home exam in Moodle

  Internationa connections

  Visit from a professor in midwifery from South Africa w 39.
  Then the lectures will be in English

  Student's schedule and workload

  7 credits correspond to 189 hours of work for students.
  
  Qualitative methodology 5cr:
  Introduction 2h, lecture on interview including exercises 4h, research process 4h, qualitative content analysis including exercises 8h, midwifery, nursing or public health theory theory 2h. other: recorded lectures in Moodle, tutorials and individual and group work to be submitted in Moodle.
  
  Quantitative research methodology is 1.5 cr which is equivalent to 40.5 hours work of which 8 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  A written assignment is failed when it doesn't fulfill the requirements for a passed grade. The requirements for passed grade are available at the Moodlepage designed for the course
  The examination is evaluated based on the answers given and if not the points all together reaches 50% of maximum the examination is failed.
  The quantitative assignment is evaluated similarly, according to the relative proportion of correct answers.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  50-69% correct answers

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  70-89% correct answers

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  90-100% correct answers

•   Research methodology and care theory VÅV22UV01-3001 22.08.2024-22.12.2024  7 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows basic knowledge and science theory
  - can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - know different research methods and how they are used
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
  - can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
  - can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
  - is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology, research process and care theory
  Qualitative methods
  Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  43% Face-to-face, 57% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Other literature see Moodle.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Assignments
  Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.08.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 21.08.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Kursen är kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete, samt förutsätter att man har en idé/plan för sitt examensarbete och inleder skrivandet av examensarbetet.
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion av kursen, seminarier och presentationer av examinationsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.
  
  Moodle-test in information search
  Reflection report thesis
  Scientific articles assignment
  Written exam
  Assignment in qualitative methods
  Assignment in quantitative methods
  Assignment in nursing theories
  
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 189 h

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%
  Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
  Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Research methodology and care theory VÅV22UV01-3003 02.09.2024-22.12.2024  7 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows basic knowledge and science theory
  - can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - know different research methods and how they are used
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
  - can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
  - can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
  - is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology, research process and care theory
  Qualitative methods
  Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  72% Face-to-face, 28% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Other literature see Moodle.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Assignments
  Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 02.09.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka

  Additional information

  Kursen är kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete, samt förutsätter att man har en idé/plan för sitt examensarbete och inleder skrivandet av examensarbetet.
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion av kursen, seminarier och presentationer av examinationsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.
  
  Moodle-test in information search
  Reflection report thesis
  Scientific articles assignment
  Written exam
  Assignment in qualitative methods
  Assignment in quantitative methods
  Assignment in nursing theories
  
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 189 h

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%
  Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
  Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Sexual health and gynaecological midwifery BM21BM06-3001 02.09.2024-29.09.2024  5 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has in-depth knowledge of sexual health and sexology
  - can guide and support clients in issues related to sexual health and family planning
  - has in-depth knowledge of gynecological care
  - has clinical skills in gynecological care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Sexual health
  Gynecological care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Klemetti R. & Raussi-Lehto, E. (red.), Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta – Seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014–2020, Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. Opas 33/2014.
  
  Lindgren et al. 2022. Reproduktiv hälsa. Barnmorksans kompetensområde. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Lundgren, I, Blix, E, Gottfredsdottir, H., Wikberg, A. & Aagard Nohr, E. 2022. Theories and perspectives for midwifery a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Oscarsson M. & Georgsson S. (red.). (2021). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Harvala m.fl., 2021, Kätilötyö. Edita, Helsingfors.
  
  Ryttyläinen K. & Valkama S., 2010, Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä, Edita, Helsingfors
  
  Tapanainen,J., Heikinheimo, O.& Kaarin Mäkikallio, K. (toim.) 2019 (eller 2011). Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Duodecim. (kap. 1-17, 20-31)(kap. 2-12, 14-28 i 2011)
  
  www.terveysportti.fi
  According to instructions from the lecturers

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group works, discussion, video, demonstration, practical exercises, individual work

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 29.09.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Seats

  5 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Written exam 40p
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Lectures
  Compulsory attendance at practical exercises and group work
  Moodle exam in class
  Plan and conduct a lesson in sexual health
  Active participation in discussions

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Validation according to general directives in Novia.
  Written exam deadline see Moodle
  Retake exams on two general exam days, see Moodle or Peppi
  
  Registration on Peppi is compulsory for re take exams no later than the Monday before the exam.
  In the retake Tapanainen et al. see above or equivalent literature in English + Moodle material both lectures and groups works are included.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  5cr=135h
  lectures
  practical exercises
  grupparbeten
  presentationer av grupparbeten

•   The Profession of Nurse and Midwife BM22GV01-3003 02.09.2024-25.10.2024  6 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  - has knowledge of their own professional field, the history and development of care science
  - has knowledge of and can reflect on basic concepts in care science
  - knows the basic competence requirements for their own profession
  - understand the importance of evidence-based care
  - can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
  - has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
  - have basic skills in interprofessional work
  - understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
  - understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
  - has knowledge about The Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030 and its implementation at Novia
  - is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Caring science knowledge and evidence as a basis for care
  The importance of the nursing and public health nursing profession
  Work areas of nurse and midwife
  Health care in Finland
  Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
  General laws in social and health care
  Interprofessional work
  The client's / patient's position and rights
  Ethical guidelines and codes
  Professional encounters
  Person centered care
  Intercultural care
  Internal sustainability in the profession

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing theorists and their work (Eighth edition.). Elsevier.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Rehnsfeldt, A. & Arman, M. (red.). 2020. Klinisk vårdvetenskap. Vårdande på teoretisk grund. Stockholm: Liber Ab.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 4.
  
  INTERCULTURAL NURSING CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ekblad, S, (red.).Hälsa och mångfald: ett kliniskt perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.
  Wellman
  + links on Moodle

  Learning methods

  lectures, groupwork, tutorials, online tests, and workshops

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing ethics assessed pass/fail
  
  The assignment (nursing science + interultural nursing) is assessed with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  
  Criteria for evaluation Max score 40:
  - Have chosen a relevant term and described it 10
  - Referred to one of the recommended books on each subject of health sciences and
  intercultural care 2
  - Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  - Referred to a scientific article/study (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and concept e.g. health of Vietnamese. Told about the result 3
  - Interviewed a person from a culture other than their own. Told about the result. The questions in appendix 2
  - Reflection 3
  - Followed Novia's instructions for degree project especially references 2
  - 9 pages of text on 3 stud., 5-6 on 2 stud. 1
  - Extra Literature 1
  - Something extra in addition to what was required, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  - Comments on other people's work on Moodle 3
  - Submitted on agreed date 1
  
  The health care organization is assessed 0-5
  
  Own work if the profession is assessed pass/fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 25.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 13.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Carina Gädda, Frida Gädda, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Introductions, workshops and seminars have mandatory attendance.
  
  Group feedback, individual feedback on demand
  The course has been updated from evaluation of previous courses
  All assignments need to follow Instructions for writing thesis in Novia
  AI is not allowed to use.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's instructions

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Nursing and Midwifery associations in Finland
  Welfare county
  Interviews

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Nursing Ethics: Online Tests
  
  Nursing Sciences + Intercultural Care: assignment
  
  Health care organization: Sote, legislation: assignment
  
  Own profession and sustainable development: assignment
  
  See deadlines for assignments in Moodle

  Internationa connections

  interview

  Student's schedule and workload

  Nursing science and intercultural care: lectures and group exercises and discussions + team work with the exercise work = 54h.
  
  Nursing ethics 2h introduction, 25h own reading and implementation of tests and tasks
  
  Sote and legislation: lectures + group work and discussions = 54h
  
  Own profession and sustainable development: lectures and material other own reading and implementation + individual task = 27h

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  Not reached criteria for grade 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See above

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  See above

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  See above