Academic year 2023 - 2024

•   Antenatal care BM21BM03-3001 04.03.2024-17.05.2024  5 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - has knowledge about complications during pregnancy
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - has knowledge of couple relationships, parenting and early interaction
  - can identify women with fear of childbirth and has knowledge about care of women with fear of childbirth

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care
  Post partum care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. (2021). Kätilötyö. Edita.
  Lindgren et al (2022). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentliteratur.
  Berg, M. & Lundgren, I. (2010). Att stöda och stärka - vårdande vid barnafödande. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T.( red.) (2015). Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Institutet för hälsa och välfärd, Helsingfors.
  NEUKO-database
  Tuomi J (red), Viisaat valinnat, hedelmällisyyden suojelu. Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulu.
  Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures, cases, discussions, self-studies.
  Practical skills training + film

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved clinical training by filming
  Passed exam
  Passed individual assignments
  
  Mandatory presence at lectures on post partum examination.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 17.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 03.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Seats

  8 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Terese Österberg, Carita Blomström, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Course introduction and clinical training are compulsory
  Attendance and active participation in all lessons is recommended.
  
  
  Written feedback on individual assignment by e-mail to each student.
  General feedback on written exam to the whole class.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical training (and filming) and active participation in the course.
  Written exam.
  Individual assignment.
  Individual assignment on cultural sensitivity, presentation on seminar.
  
  Mandatory attendance at lectures in Postpatrum check-up in May 2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Antenatal care 2 BM14BM04-3005 28.08.2023-28.01.2024  3 credits  (UBM22F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - can identify women with childbearing fears and have basic knowledge of the care of childbearing fears

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. (2021). Kätilötyö. Edita.
  Lindgren m.fl. (2022). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentlitteratur.
  Nationella expertgruppen för mödravården (Förf.) (2015) Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (Red.)
  Handbok för mödrarådgivningen - Nationell rekommendation
  Tillgänglig från http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/126655
  Naistentaudit ja synnykset. toim. Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O. & Mäkikallio, K. 2019, Duodecim
  Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions, group work, self-studies.
  Webinar about cultural sensitivity in midwifery context, within the Nordplus network Freja.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, an approved examination (at least 60% right) and approved assignments are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 28.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM22F-V
  • UBM20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Terese Österberg, Carita Blomström, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback på tentamen ges allmännt till hela gruppen via moodle.
  
  Kursen innehåller flera utomstående föreläsare. Närvaro rekommenderas vid samtliga lektioner. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examnination
  Individual assignment
  Group work
  Mandatory attendance at lectures in Postpatrum check-up in October 2023.
  Mandatory attendance at conference about cultural sensitivity in September 2023.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam autumn 2023.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3036 05.10.2023-15.12.2023  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning methods

  The national training programme in vaccination knowledge has been developed in cooperation with Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Diakonia University of Applied Sciences, Turku University of Applied Sciences and the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. The Swedish-language programme has been developed in cooperation with Novia University of Applied Sciences and Arcada University of Applied Sciences.
  
  
  The course is realised virtually as independent studies via the online platform Moodle during the time period 5.10-15.12 2023.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course has been designed to cover all the basic areas of vaccination that the vaccinator should know and master.
  
  According to THL, passing the study section is the main proof of the important theoretical vaccination knowledge required by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health's Vaccination Decree for nurses and midwives working as vaccinators.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  25.08.2023 - 05.10.2023

  • 2 credits

  Seats

  19 - 110

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen är en fortbildning som riktar sig till professionella i arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  Total working hours of the course: 54 hours = 2 ECTS

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3008 15.09.2023-15.12.2023  6 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3009 02.10.2023-17.12.2023  6 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar
  På engelska

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

  Content scheduling

  Theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3013 28.08.2023-27.10.2023  6 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 27.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3014 04.09.2023-30.11.2023  6 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar
  På engelska

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

  Content scheduling

  Theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3008 18.09.2023-29.10.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi
  As well as recommended material in moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lecture, group work and presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grupparbete GK/UK
  Tentamen 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3010 25.09.2023-10.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Gaudeamus. 2022, Terveempi maailma.Gaudeamus ja Helsingin yliopisto.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar både online och på Moodle
  Självstudier
  Gruppuppgift obligatorisk
  Uppgift i epidemiologi
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Gruppuppgift med seminarium GK/ UK
  Uppgift i epidemiologi GK/UK
  Grupp hemtentamen 1-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 10.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 24.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 46

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Lärare Pia Nygårdas (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete (1,0 sp) inlämning vecka 42, 20.10 kl. 16.00 obligatorisk. Gemensam skrifltig respons på Moodle. GK/UK
  Uppgift i epidemiologi v. 41, inlämning enligt överneskommelse, obligatorisk GK/UK
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 45, 6.11 kl.16.00. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. 1-5. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 34 h
  Gruppuppgift samt uppgift i epidemiologi 20 h
  Hemtentamen 27 h (not translated)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3012 20.11.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Självstudier
  Workshop/ Smågruppsarbete obligatorisk närvaro
  Gruppuppgift med seminarium obligatorisk närvaro
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Gruppuppgift med seminarium GK/ UK
  Grupp hemtentamen 1-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Lärare Pia Nygårdas (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops under lekitoner . Muntlig respons under workshoppen
  Uppgift i epidemiologi v. 49 GK/UK
  Grupparbete med seminarium (1,0 sp) vecka 50 obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons vid seminariumtillfället vecka 50. GK/UK
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 50. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar. (1-5)
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 27 h
  Gruppuppgift samt seminarium 20 h
  Hemtentamen 34 h (not translated)

•   Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3002 15.04.2024-26.05.2024  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in different business environments within healthcare
  - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
  - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
  - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR01-PR03

  Content of the study unit

  Care assessment
  ABCDE evaluation
  Telephone counseling
  Digital consulting
  Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  Ethics
  Sustainable Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Care Assessment:
  Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432
  
  Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630
  
  Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974
  
  Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255
  
  Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3
  
  Health technology:
  
  Nordens välfärdscenter
  https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/
  
  Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
  https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/
  
  Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
  https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-
  
  Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
  https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324
  
  Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658
  
  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z
  
  Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

  Learning methods

  lectures, group discussion and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar and assignment
  instruction will be given in Moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS= 27 hours

  Content scheduling

  Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
  Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

  Assessment criteria

  Did not achieve any of the criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Care of the Patient with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beahvior VÅV21KV14-3002 28.08.2023-05.11.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 05.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda, Johanna Sigfrids

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit?

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour VÅV21KV14-3003 20.11.2023-25.02.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  6 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour VÅV21KV14-3006 20.11.2023-04.02.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 04.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit?

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Clinical antenatal midwifery BM18KB03-3003 02.01.2024-20.12.2024  9 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during pregnancy
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care in maternity health care during pregnancy and childhood
  - can identify the pregnant woman's resources and health problems and support both the health of the pregnant woman and the waiting family
  - has insights into models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - has insights into family planning
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical antenatal midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at antenatal clinic.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3006 28.08.2023-13.10.2023  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22GV06
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: Strålsäkerhetslagen, Statsrådets förordning om joniserande strålning, Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets förordning om joniserande strålning, S-föreskrifterna, Radiologi (2022, Blomqvist, L. & Zackrisson, S.)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 13.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 1 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 8 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgifter som finns på moodle gör på egen hand:
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 1, 8 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift, 1,½ - 2 h
  Deltagande i seniormässan4.10: 6 h, 3 h / studerande
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 1 h 15 min/studerande
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: ca 33 h
  Eget arbete: 7,5 h
  TOTALT: 40,5 h
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp = 27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberädande för kunskaptest & genomförtande av kunskapstest.
  
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  On-line examination in radiation safety, Grade: Approved/Failed

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 1 BM18KB06-3003 02.10.2023-24.12.2023  6 credits  (UBM22F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the nursing woman, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills in identifying deviations and dealing with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in cooperation with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 24.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM22F-V
  • UBM20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 2 BM18KB07-3003 01.01.2024-02.06.2024  6 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the nursing woman, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills in identifying deviations and dealing with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in cooperation with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 02.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 3 BM18KB08-3003 04.03.2024-30.11.2024  6 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth and identify abnormalities in it
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - can care for abnormal delivery and risk delivery in a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 30.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 02.04.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 4 BM18KB09-3002 01.08.2023-31.12.2023  6 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can manage the normal delivery independently
  - mastered fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - In case of deviant delivery and during risk delivery, can care for a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - Master-safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 3

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.
  
  An update of First Aid at campus autumn 2023.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.07.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3005 08.01.2024-23.02.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Petra Lithén

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 23.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 04.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamen: 20.2.24
  
  Omtentamina: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  På svenska
  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3006 11.03.2024-21.04.2024  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Petra Lithén

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen. Se bedömningskriterier nedan. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamina: 15.4.2024
  
  Omtentamina 2024: 24.5.24 (allmän omtentamen) samt 13.9.24 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3009 29.01.2024-17.03.2024  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Petra Lithén

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.01.2024 - 17.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 25.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamina: 11.3.24
  
  Omtentamina 2023: 3.5.24 (allmän omtentamen) samt 13.9.24 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period BM18KB02-3003 02.10.2023-22.12.2024  9 credits  (UBM22F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during puerperium
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the mother's and the child's care during puerperium and document it according to national documentation systems
  - can work family-centered in the support of the new family
  - can create a good care relationship with the woman and her family and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within postnatal care
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in postnatal care.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM22F-V
  • UBM20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical midwifery in an optional context 1 VÅV18KVV19-3003 02.01.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within optional midwife context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good nursing care relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the nursing care team

  Prerequisites

  Clinical care during the postnatal period
  Clinical care of the pregnant women
  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery in an optional context

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in optional midwifery context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical midwifery in an optional context 2 BM18KB11-3003 29.01.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within selected midwife context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Clinical care during the postnatal period
  Clinical care of the pregnant women
  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery in an optional context

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in optional midwifery context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.01.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 28.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3001 11.09.2023-29.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3003 04.09.2023-01.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 01.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3006 27.11.2023-17.12.2023  2 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h /sp for students
  total 54 h

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3001 06.11.2023-31.03.2024  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 31.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  07.10.2023 - 31.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Midseminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedual

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 H/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3004 01.01.2024-29.02.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 29.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Midseminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedual

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 H/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3005 28.08.2023-30.01.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice

  Learning methods

  Individual supervision
  seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. the analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 30.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  15 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  -
  See scedule and Moodle course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  See Novia instructions for validation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar December to January

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

  Content scheduling

  Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  See practical guide and content above

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3001 08.01.2024-12.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.03.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Anita Kvist, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Thesis
  Maturity test

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3002 01.01.2024-31.07.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the topic of Thesis

  Learning methods

  Independent work with support from the supervisor.
  Seminar + maturity test.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis is assessed according to 5 criteria, scientific writing, theoretical framework, method, result and presentation. Each criteria ha a scale from 1 to 5. The assessment criteria is published on the Moodlepage linked to this implementation plan.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 31.07.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  See practical guide and Moodle course.
  Follow Novia instuctions for thesis writing.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered, then an agreement is needed
  The data material can be collected from different helath care or other organisations if ethical permissions are approved.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation and maturity test in May or in week 47, see Moodle and time schedule.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  Students plan their time use themselves, see below

  Content scheduling

  154 hours mostly self-directed work, 6 hours seminar 2 hours maturity test.

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3003 25.03.2024-12.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.03.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.03.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Ann-Louise Glasberg, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Jannica Andtfolk, Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Anita Wikberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Marice Nedergård, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Thesis
  Maturity test

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3002 13.05.2024-06.10.2024  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the topic of Thesis.
  See also literature in method course.
  For inspiration to find a title:
  Lundgren, I., Blix, E., Gottfredsdóttir, H., Wikberg, A. & Aagaard Nohr, E. (Eds.) 2022. Theories and perspectives for midwifery - a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Oscarsson M. & Gerorgsson S. (red.). (2021). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  An introduction lecture to the course will be held. The course is mainly done as selfdirected studies with possibility to group supervision. submission of the plan for the thesis is the examination.
  
  The content of the work plan for thesis:
  Novia titlepage
  Table of content
  Introduction
  Background (description of the topic, at least 5-6 scientific studies)
  Aim and problem definition
  Method (Data collection based on 2 references/discuss method of selection)
  Ethical consideration (based on references)
  Timetable
  Reference list
  Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
  Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis.
  
  1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle (no key needed)
  2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
  3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest and motivation of studying it.
  4. Background shall be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters where description of concepts and the topic of the subject. In the background you also describe the previous research done
  5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
  6. The method can be described on 1-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
  7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. refer to relevant documents on Finnish National advicory board on Research Integrity TENK. (tenk.fi)
  8. Time plan should estimate how Thesis proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
  9. Works cited
  
  Submit manuscript on Moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For an approved Thesis plan the requirements stipulated above should fulfilled.
  The plan fulfills the above stipulated requirements = GK, which mean PASS

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.05.2024 - 06.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 12.05.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Start well in advance!
  Individual feedback after submitting the plan.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general instructions
  Evaluated as failed or pass

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered but this is not necessary.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  submission in the beginning of October 2024.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 3 credits which is equivalent to about 80 h work for the student out of which 10 are scheduled, the rest is individual work.No seminar. See time table.

  Content scheduling

  Individual planning is part of the process

•   Developmental project in midwifery BM14FU04-3007 28.08.2023-09.06.2024  5 credits  (UBM22F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in midwifery

  Prerequisites

  Thesis 2

  Content of the study unit

  Developmental project in midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the chosen theme

  Learning methods

  Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The development work is evaluated 1-5
  Criteria for evaluation
  Starting point for and goal of the development work
  The theoretical foundation of development work
  Area of ​​use for the development work
  Critical review of development work, process and product

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM22F-V
  • UBM20D-V

  Seats

  1 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The lectures and seminars are compulsory.
  Novia instructions for writing thesis is used

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  A finished product and presentation of development project

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation of development work in November 2023 or in May 2024

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 h lecture
  4 h seminars
  127 h individual work, with supervision

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
  The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
  Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
  Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
  The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
  The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
  The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
  The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
  The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
  Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.
  
  The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
  The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
  The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
  The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3009 11.09.2023-17.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 17.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 3x27h= 81h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 7h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 61h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  På svenska
  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3010 25.09.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Infusionshastighet
  
  Utspädningar
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 3x27h= 81h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 7h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 61h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  På svenska
  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3012 23.10.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 22.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
  Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
  Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3013 06.11.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedlesräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  På engelska (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3008 18.03.2024-21.04.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 17.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3009 19.02.2024-29.03.2024  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.02.2024 - 29.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 16.02.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
  Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H /cr

  Content scheduling

  Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
  Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3010 01.04.2024-12.05.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
  Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H /cr

  Content scheduling

  Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
  Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3011 01.04.2024-12.05.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3001 28.08.2023-01.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 01.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   English VÅV22EN01-3006 15.04.2024-24.05.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 24.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 12.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3007 04.03.2024-07.04.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3010 29.04.2024-26.05.2024  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.04.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 28.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3002 02.01.2024-24.03.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 24.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   Family Health Care VÅV21HV03-3001 16.10.2023-17.12.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 13.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's and young people's health and children's healthcare 3 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Developmental psychology 0.5 credits - written assignment
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV21HV03-3006 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 04.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's and young people's health and children's healthcare 3 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Developmental psychology 0.5 credits - written assignment
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3008 04.12.2023-02.02.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.12.2023 - 02.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 03.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3010 06.11.2023-10.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 10.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3011 12.02.2024-22.03.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 22.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 09.02.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3012 02.01.2024-16.02.2024  3 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 16.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga kursen såväl muntligt som skriftligt men behöver inte närvara under lektionerna. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. 2 omtentamenstillfällen. Höjning av vitsord möjligt inom ett år efter godkänt vitsord. (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3007 02.01.2024-28.01.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 28.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.12.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3008 14.09.2023-20.10.2023  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.09.2023 - 20.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 h = 54 h

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3011 06.11.2023-08.12.2023  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  essons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 08.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3013 15.04.2024-19.05.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 19.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time
  Group assinment

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3001 08.04.2024-19.05.2024  4 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.04.2024 - 19.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 04.04.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3004 27.11.2023-14.01.2024  4 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
  
  Forumreflection Pass/fail
  Written assignment for seminar according to Novias instruction for written assignments/ Thesis and opponentship pass, not pass complement
  Onlinetest 0-5; 75% correct for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 14.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

  Assessment criteria

  The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
  The methodological literature is not used.
  Reflections are not performed.
  The technical design is lacking.
  Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
  The literature is referenced
  Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
  The technical design is satisfactory.
  Refers concepts and basic principle
  Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The questions are answered.
  The methodological literature is applied.
  The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
  The technical design is good
  Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
  The literature is analyzed and applied.
  The reflection is scientifically analytical.
  The technical design is commendable.
  Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
  Makes versatile use of literature
  Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3005 04.03.2024-07.04.2024  4 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Gynaecological midwifery care VÅV18KVV18-3003 02.10.2023-31.12.2023  6 credits  (UBM22F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the gynecological patient's care, and document this
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in gynecological care context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Gynaecological midwifery care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in gynaecological context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM22F-V
  • UBM20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3013 09.10.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Guidebook for expecting and looking after a baby. Helsinki: Institute for Health and Welfare (available online)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration,groupworks, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.10.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w. 41-46. See time table.
  Retake exams on the following general exams: 24th of November and 8th of December 2023.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3014 02.09.2023-15.10.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/146505 Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby THL. A guidebook for expecting and looking after a baby, Helsinki: THL ( available online)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period, including using THL guide for antenatal clinics: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2023 - 15.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi.
  Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written quiz on delivery on the last lecture with AW 13.9
  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w. 40
  Retake exams on the following general exams: 27th of October and 24th of November 2023.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3001 22.01.2024-25.02.2024  5 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22HF01

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Holmström, E. & Ohlsson, K. 2014. Människan i arbetslivet. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)
  THL. 2023. Dtabasen NEUKO , Terveysportti.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 41

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination Moodle on the last lecture of the course w.
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams x of January and of February 2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h /cr
  5 cr = 135 h

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3002 04.03.2024-14.04.2024  5 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22HF01

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
  THL.2023. Databasen Neuko (ersätter Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex

  Learning methods

  Inbandade föreläsningar på Moodle, individuella uppgifter samt tentamen på moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 14.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Additional information

  Kursen är online och studierna förverkligas sjävständigt under tiden 4/3-12/4 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodle tentamen 12 /4 klockan 9-11.30 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 t
  5 sp = 135 timmar individuella studier (not translated)

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3003 15.04.2024-31.05.2024  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22HF01

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Maternity care:
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
  
  STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL.2023. Databasen Neuko (ersätter Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, group work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Exam
  Two retakes possible

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr, 5 cr= 135h

•   High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical midwifery BM18KB04-3003 01.01.2024-20.12.2024  6 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights on midwifery knowledge during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant puerperium
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant puerperium

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice with women with highrisk pregnancy, -delivery or postnatal period.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3007 04.09.2023-10.11.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur som t.ex. Medibas, Terveysportti. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, samt Moodle-baserad undervisning i form av föreläsningsvideon, övningsuppgifter och självständiga studier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 10.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 46

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter.
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3008 04.09.2023-03.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 03.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 4.12. 2023
  Re-examination 19.01.2024, 08.03.2024 and 03.05.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3010 18.09.2023-19.11.2023  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 14.11.2023
  Re-examination 08.12.2023, 08.03.2024 and 03.05.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Internal Medicine and Surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3010 02.01.2024-16.02.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 16.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.12.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  18h Teori ONLINE
  
  Praktiska Övningar 12h/ grupp OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  18h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  1h Hjärtarytmitest
  3h tent
  74 h studier på egenhand (för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning). (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3007 29.01.2024-10.03.2024  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.01.2024 - 10.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 26.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  Endokrinologi 3/4 sp = 6 h teori
  
  Respiratoriska Sjukdomstillstånd
  Teori 12h
  Praktiska 8 h x 2 gånger (indelade i två grupper, alltså 8 h per grupp)
  
  Kardiologiska sjukdomar och hjärtrytmer 1 sp
  12h teori
  2 x 4 h SimMan övningar
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  30h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  3h tent
  63 h för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3008 04.03.2024-28.04.2024  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 28.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 03.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  Endokrinologi 3/4 sp = 6 h teori
  
  Respiratoriska sjukdomstillstånd
  Teori 12h
  Praktiska 8 h x 2 gånger (indelade i två grupper, alltså 8 h per grupp ;))
  
  Kardiologiska sjukdomar och hjärtrytmer 1 sp
  12h teori
  2 x 4 h SimMan övningar
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  30h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  3h tent
  63 h för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 2 VÅV22KV02-3007 11.03.2024-28.04.2024  5 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGIC CARE
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Stubberud, D., Grønseth, R., Almås, H., Ahlberg, K., Bolinder-Palmér, I., Olsson, K., & Toverud, K. C. (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad: 2 (Upplaga 3.). Kap 20 och 21. Liber AB.
  Ericson, T., Lind, M., & Abelsson, J. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB. Kapitel 13
  Föreläsningar och instuderingsfrågor på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  
  Simrén, M., Bergquist, A., Hultcrantz, R., Karling, P., Lindgren., Stål,. P. 2023. Gastroenterologi och hepatologi. Andra upplagan, Liber AB, Stockholm.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.03.2024 - 28.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 10.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam on the last lecture
  Two retake exams on genral examdays
  Deadline for sexuality assignment

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning
  1 cr = 27 h. 5 cr= 135 h.
  
  Gynecologic care: 16 h lectures, 2 h exam, 4 h individual work on sexuality assignment, 32 h individual work = 54 h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 2 VÅV22KV02-3008 22.04.2024-31.05.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGIC CARE
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  
  Simrén, M., Bergquist, A., Hultcrantz, R., Karling, P., Lindgren., Stål,. P. 2023. Gastroenterologi och hepatologi. Andra upplagan, Liber AB, Stockholm.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.04.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam on the last lecture
  Two retake exams on genral examdays
  Deadline for sexuality assignment

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning
  1 cr = 27 h. 5 cr= 135 h.
  
  Gynecologic care: 16 h lectures, 2 h exam, 4 h individual work on sexuality assignment, 32 h individual work = 54 h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 2 VÅV22KV02-3010 25.03.2024-10.05.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGIC CARE
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Stubberud, D., Grønseth, R., Almås, H., Ahlberg, K., Bolinder-Palmér, I., Olsson, K., & Toverud, K. C. (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad: 2 (Upplaga 3.). Kap 20 och 21. Liber AB.
  Ericson, T., Lind, M., & Abelsson, J. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB. Kapitel 13
  Föreläsningar och instuderingsfrågor på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  o Kap. 10. Vård vid leversjukdomar s. 473 – 520.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.03.2024 - 10.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 22.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Första tenten på kursens sista lektion
  Två omtentamenstillfällen på allmänna examenstillfällen ( se moodle)
  Workshop övningar är obligatoriska
  Deadline för sexualitetsuppgift (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3001 25.09.2023-19.11.2023  5 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 10. Allmän ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red) 2022. Omvårdnad &kirurgi. Kap.28. Ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi - skallskada och ryggmärgsskada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Kap 23 och 24. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R.(red). 2011.Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Andra upplagan. Kap. 34. Omvårdnad vid blodsjukdomar. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter som utförs under kursens gång.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktisk övningar och SimMan övningar och bedöms GK/UK
  Godkänd test i hematologi
  Skriftlig tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 29.10.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam during last lecture in the course
  Two retake exams on genral exam days

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h. 5 sp= 135 h.
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3003 28.08.2023-15.10.2023  5 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 10. Allmän ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red) 2022. Omvårdnad &kirurgi. Kap.28. Ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi - skallskada och ryggmärgsskada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Kap 23 och 24. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R.(red). 2011.Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Andra upplagan. Kap. 34. Omvårdnad vid blodsjukdomar. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures online, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter som utförs under kursens gång.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktisk övningar och SimMan övningar och bedöms GK/UK
  Godkänd test i hematologi
  Skriftlig tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 36

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture online
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam during last lecture in the course
  Two retake exams on genral exam days

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h. 5 sp= 135 h.
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3006 28.08.2023-15.10.2023  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 10. Allmän ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red) 2022. Omvårdnad &kirurgi. Kap.28. Ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi - skallskada och ryggmärgsskada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Kap 23 och 24. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R.(red). 2011.Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Andra upplagan. Kap. 34. Omvårdnad vid blodsjukdomar. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter som utförs under kursens gång.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktisk övningar och SimMan övningar och bedöms GK/UK
  Godkänd test i hematologi
  Skriftlig tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam during last lecture in the course
  Two retake exams on genral exam days

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h. 5 sp= 135 h.
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Intrapartum care 1 BM14BM05-3006 29.04.2024-26.05.2024  3 credits  (UBM21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have the skills to be able to support the parents during labor
  - understands the delivery process
  - mastered the care during normal delivery
  - has knowledge of fetal monitoring
  - in collaboration with the giving woman can realize pain relief during childbirth
  - has basic knowledge of complications during childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of documentation during childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of safe working methods in childcare

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. Kätilötyö (2021)
  Lindgrne et al (2022) Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentlitteratur.
  Suomen kätilöliitto, Synnyttäjän hoito ponnistusvaihessa
  Lindgren m.fl. Barnmorskans handläggning vid normal förlossning: forskning och erfarenhet, Studentlitteratur, Lund (2019)
  http://ctgutbildning.se/
  http://backenbottenutbildning.se/

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, clinical skills training, study visit to VCS/delivery room

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed exam
  Active participation in clinical skills training
  Approved films and other individual assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.04.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 28.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V

  Seats

  8 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Course introduction and clinical skills training are compulsory
  Active participation in all classes are recommended.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination, grades 0-5
  Filming of correct suturing technique, approved/not approved
  Filming of a pushing phase
  Simulation training, approved/not approved
  Work in pair about medical pain relief + presentation , grades 0-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam xx, retake xx and xx
  Group work deadline xx
  Film, deadline xx

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

•   Intrapartum midwifery 2 BM18KB05-3003 20.09.2023-31.05.2024  3 credits  (UBM20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has the skills to support the parents during childbirth
  - mastered the care during normal delivery
  - has knowledge of fetal monitoring
  - has knowledge of pain and pain relief during childbirth
  - has knowledge and ability to deal with care during childbirth complications individually and together with other professional groups
  - can demonstrate obstetric knowledge and knowledge in anesthesiology in relation to childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of documentation during childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of safe working methods in childbirth care

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen et al, Kätilötyö
  Lindgren et al, Reproduktiv hälsa.
  Backenbottenutbildning.se
  ctg-utbildning.se
  Käypähoito
  Vårdhandboken
  Moodle course Änglatröst
  Articles according to the lecturers' instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions
  Moodle course Änglatröst
  Bäckenbottenutbildning.se
  ctg-utbildning.se
  Practical skills training, simulations
  Individual assignments
  Clinical Examination
  Written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, the following are required:
  Certificate of completed course "Bäckenbottenutbildning" and "ctg-utbildning"
  Approved written exam
  Approved clinical examination
  Presence at all mandatory lessons
  
  General feedback on exam answers is given to the whole class at the same time, for individual feedback the teacher is contacted.
  Feedback on practical skills is given directly in the situation.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2023 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  External lecturer:
  Gynecologist Päivi Kivelä - ctg
  Hospital chaplain Ann-Sofi Nylund
  
  Mandatory attendance at course introduction, clinical simulations and at lessons with external lecturers

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam
  Clinical examination
  CTG-utbildning.se
  Bäckenbottenutbildning.se

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  week 22 in spring 2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr, 3 cr = 81 h

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication VÅV22IN01-3009 28.08.2023-22.10.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbete
  Material påmoodle
  
  Introduktion
  Allt material finns på moodle