Academic year 2022 - 2023

•   Antenatal care 1 BM14BM03-3005 13.03.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (UBM22F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - has knowledge of couple relationships, parenting and early interaction

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. (2021). Kätilötyö. Edita.
  Lindgren et al (2022). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentliteratur.
  Berg, M. & Lundgren, I. (2010). Att stöda och stärka - vårdande vid barnafödande. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Kapitel 1-5 samt 12
  Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T.( red.) (2015). Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Institutet för hälsa och välfärd, Helsingfors.
  NEUKO-database
  Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions, group work, self-studies.
  Practical skills training + film

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved clinical training by filming
  Passed exam
  Individual assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.03.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 12.03.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM22F-V
  • UBM20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Course introduction and clinical training are compulsory
  Attendance and active participation in all lessons is recommended.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical training (and filming) and active participation in the course.
  Written exam.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

•   Antenatal care 2 BM14BM04-3004 29.08.2022-31.01.2023  3 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - can identify women with childbearing fears and have basic knowledge of the care of childbearing fears

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. (2015). Kätilötyö. Edita.
  Lindgren m.fl. (2016). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentlitteratur.
  Nationella expertgruppen för mödravården (Förf.) (2015) Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (Red.)
  Handbok för mödrarådgivningen - Nationell rekommendation
  Tillgänglig från http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/126655
  Naistentaudit ja synnykset. toim. Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O. & Mäkikallio, K. 2019, Duodecim
  Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions, group work, self-studies.
  Webinar about cultural sensitivity in midwifery context, within the Nordplus network Freja.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, an approved examination (at least 60% right) and approved assignments are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 31.01.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examnination
  Individual assignment
  Group work
  Mandatory attendance at lectures in Postpatrum check-up in January 2023.
  Mandatory attendance at conference about cultural sensitivity in September 2022.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam autumn 2022.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3032 29.08.2022-31.12.2022  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se Moodlekursen (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Samarbetsstudier med Yrkeshögskolan Arcada Hösten 2022
  Virtuell kurs via Moodlekurs , Novia , Vasa (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Enligt nationella standarder - se moodlekursen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  30.07.2022 - 28.08.2022

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Se Moodlekursen (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3033 21.09.2022-05.02.2023  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Samarbetsstudier med Högskolan på Åland
  Virtuella studier via Moodle, Novia, Vasa (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2022 - 05.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  22.08.2022 - 20.09.2022

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3026 12.09.2022-13.12.2022  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 13.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 14.09.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio 24.10
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 28.11-11.12 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3028 26.09.2022-13.11.2022  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 25.09.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Christine Alm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio 17.10 kl.16
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 1.11-10.11 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Belastning för studerande 27h/sp (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3029 12.09.2022-11.12.2022  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning online (obligatorisk)
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 11.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för portfolioinlämning v 41 10.10 kl 8
  Virtuell tentamen öppen v 41- 44 14.10- 4.11
  Feedbacktillfälle+ praktiska övningar 2.12 kl 8.15-9.15 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3031 06.03.2023-14.05.2023  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning online (obligatorisk)
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.03.2023 - 14.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 05.03.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio 20.4.2023
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 2.5-12.5.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3001 05.09.2022-06.11.2022  6 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012.
  Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2022 - 06.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 18.09.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3003 03.10.2022-18.12.2022  6 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012.
  Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodle lectures

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 05.10.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h
  
  20 h (5 x 4h) Theory lessons in class
  20 h (5 x 4h) Practical exercises 3 times in common with VAMK, 2 times only Novia ALL TIMES MANDATORY
  119 h Individual assignments, group work, exam reading
  3 h exam

  Content scheduling

  Theory
  
  Lesson 1
  The care process
  Ethics in healthcare
  ISBAR
  FinCC
  Arrival interview
  
  Lesson 2
  Ergonomics
  Patient hygiene
  Carer's hygiene
  
  Lesson 3
  Vital functions and diabetes
  
  Lesson 4
  Nutrition (food and nasal stomach probe) and Elimination (catheterization and ostomy)
  
  Lesson 5
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3004 19.09.2022-27.11.2022  6 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012.
  Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 27.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 18.09.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h
  
  1 x 6 h Introduktion Online Obligatorisk
  121 h teori läsning, individuella uppgifter, grupparbeten och tent läsning
  32 h (4 x 8 h) Praktiska övningar vid Alere Obligatoriska
  3 h tentamen (Online) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3005 02.01.2023-26.02.2023  6 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012.
  Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (2004).Tionde upplagan 2021. Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodle lectures

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-2

  Seats

  10 - 20

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h
  
  20 h (5 x 4h) Theory lessons in class
  20 h (5 x 4h) Practical exercises 3 times in common with VAMK, 2 times only Novia ALL TIMES MANDATORY
  119 h Individual assignments, group work, exam reading
  3 h exam

  Content scheduling

  Theory
  
  Lesson 1
  The care process
  Ethics in healthcare
  ISBAR
  FinCC
  Arrival interview
  
  Lesson 2
  Ergonomics
  Patient hygiene
  Carer's hygiene
  
  Lesson 3
  Vital functions and diabetes
  
  Lesson 4
  Nutrition (food and nasal stomach probe) and Elimination (catheterization and ostomy)
  
  Lesson 5
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3005 02.01.2023-26.02.2023  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, lektioner, grupparbete och självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  6 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Grupparbete, seminarier, självstudieuppgifter och tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen då kursen avslutas (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar (not translated)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3001 02.11.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, lektioner, grupparbete (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.11.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 21.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  6 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Grupparbete, seminarier, självstudieuppgifter och tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen då kursen avslutas. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 t/ sp (not translated)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3003 26.09.2022-30.10.2022  3 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, lektioner, grupparbete (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 30.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 25.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Godkänd i grupparbete och tentamen. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen (not translated)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3004 01.01.2023-29.01.2023  3 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, lektioner och grupparbete (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 29.01.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 15.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-1

  Seats

  6 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Grupparbete, seminarier, självstudieuppgifter och tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkänt grupparbete och tentamen (då kursen avslutas) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3009 28.11.2022-08.01.2023  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.11.2022 - 08.01.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 29.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3011 17.10.2022-13.11.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  17.10.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 17.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3012 29.08.2022-02.12.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C., (red.) 2021. Tredje upplagan. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 5. Bukorganens sjukdomar och kirurgi. s. 113 – 185.
  o Kap. 17. Komplikationer vid trauma, kirurgi och kirurgiska sjukdomar. s. 395 – 402.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  o Kap. 10. Vård vid leversjukdomar s. 473 – 520.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 02.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 30.08.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3014 24.10.2022-13.11.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C., (red.) 2021. Tredje upplagan. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 5. Bukorganens sjukdomar och kirurgi. s. 113 – 185.
  o Kap. 17. Komplikationer vid trauma, kirurgi och kirurgiska sjukdomar. s. 395 – 402.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  o Kap. 10. Vård vid leversjukdomar s. 473 – 520.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.10.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3010 02.01.2023-05.03.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 05.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 22.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam on the last lecture of the course
  Two general exams on genreal retake days

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  3 cr = 81 h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3011 17.03.2023-27.04.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  17.03.2023 - 27.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 22.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Första tenten på kursens sista lektion
  Två omtentamenstillfällen på allmänna examenstillfällen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  3 cr = 81 h

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3012 12.12.2022-05.02.2023  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.12.2022 - 05.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 11.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Första tenten på kursens sista lektion
  Två omtentamenstillfällen på allmänna examenstillfällen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  3 cr = 81 h

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3015 02.01.2023-12.02.2023  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 12.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Första tenten på kursens sista lektion
  Två omtentamenstillfällen på allmänna examenstillfällen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  3 cr = 81 h

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3013 28.11.2022-08.01.2023  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Wold & Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO, IDF (Immune deficiency foundation), AARDA, Terveyskirjasto
  Övrigt enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.11.2022 - 08.01.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 27.11.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Immunologisk ohälsa 1 sp ; Ulla Penttinen
  Infektionssjukdomar 1 sp ; Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Isoleringspraxis med hygienskötarna vid VCS (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  
  Schemalagd undervisning ca 12 - 15 h
  
  Egna självständiga studier ca 40 h (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3012 01.01.2023-26.02.2023  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 14. Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kapitel 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, and discussions.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 60%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 75%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 75% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3015 02.01.2023-03.02.2023  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 14. Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kapitel 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, and discussions.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 03.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 60%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 75%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 75% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3009 12.09.2022-13.11.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 14. Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kapitel 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, and discussions.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 60%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 75%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 75% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3011 02.01.2023-09.04.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 14. Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kapitel 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, and discussions.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 09.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 60%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 75%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 75% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3016 30.01.2023-26.02.2023  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 4, 5 & 6.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Neurokirurgi – skallskada och ryggmärgsskada (alt. 2012 upplaga)
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønset R. & Almås H. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber. Kapitel 23-25 (alt. 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 29.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Josephine Åberg

  Additional information

  Grupparbete inom CVS är obligatoriskt tillfälle (16.2.2023) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3010 07.11.2022-11.12.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 4, 5 & 6.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Neurokirurgi – skallskada och ryggmärgsskada (alt. 2012 upplaga)
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønset R. & Almås H. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber. Kapitel 23-25 (alt. 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Grouptask

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5
  Grouptask: fail-pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.11.2022 - 11.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 09.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3011 03.10.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 4, 5 & 6.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Neurokirurgi – skallskada och ryggmärgsskada (alt. 2012 upplaga)
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønset R. & Almås H. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber. Kapitel 23-25 (alt. 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Grouptask

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5
  Grouptask: fail-pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 05.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3013 30.01.2023-26.03.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Kapitel 4, 5 & 6.
  
  Andersson R., Regnér S. & Rogmark C. (red.) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (alt. upplaga från 2012)
  Kapitel 10. Neurokirurgi – skallskada och ryggmärgsskada (alt. 2012 upplaga)
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønset R. & Almås H. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Stockholm: Liber. Kapitel 23-25 (alt. 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.01.2023 - 26.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 29.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Josephine Åberg

  Additional information

  Grupparbete inom CVS är obligatoriskt tillfälle (13.2.2023) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3007 28.11.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.& Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.11.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 01.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit?

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline 18.12.2022

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3012 29.08.2022-02.10.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 26 omvårdnad vid sjukdomar och skador i ögat.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Demonstartioner
  Praktiska övningar
  Grupparbete
  Individuella arbeten (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd tentamen
  Godkänd praktisk övning (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 02.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 30.08.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO vid Simanövning (praktiskövning) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tentamen se schema för tidpunkt
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp=27 h
  3sp= 81 h
  
  16 h (4gånger 4 timmar) teori online
  6 h praktisk övning med siman
  3 h tentamen
  56 h eget arbete (färdigställande av individuella arbeten, grupparbeten och tentamensläsning) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten:
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten:
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp:
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3014 07.11.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 26 omvårdnad vid sjukdomar och skador i ögat.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Demonstartioner
  Praktiska övningar
  Grupparbete
  Individuella arbeten (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd tentamen
  Godkänd praktisk övning (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.11.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 08.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO vid Simanövning (praktiskövning) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tentamen se schema för tidpunkt
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp=27 h
  3sp= 81 h
  
  16 h (4gånger 4 timmar) teori i klass
  6 h praktisk övning med siman (obligatorisk närvaro)
  3 h tentamen
  56 h eget arbete (färdigställande av individuella arbeten, grupparbeten och tentamensläsning) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten:
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten:
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp:
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour VÅV21KV14-3001 23.01.2023-16.04.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit
  Experience expert

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.01.2023 - 16.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 22.01.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda, Johanna Sigfrids

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Clinical antenatal midwifery BM18KB03-3002 01.01.2023-31.12.2023  9 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during pregnancy
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care in maternity health care during pregnancy and childhood
  - can identify the pregnant woman's resources and health problems and support both the health of the pregnant woman and the waiting family
  - has insights into models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - has insights into family planning
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical antenatal midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at antenatal clinic.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3001 27.03.2023-04.06.2023  5 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22GV06
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.03.2023 - 04.06.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Mikaela Engvall, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 1 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 8 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgifter som finns på moodle gör på egen hand:
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 1, 8 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift, 1,½ - 2 h
  Deltagande i seniormässan4.10: 6 h, 3 h / studerande
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 1 h 15 min/studerande
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: ca 33 h
  Eget arbete: 7,5 h
  TOTALT: 40,5 h
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp = 27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberädande för examination.
  
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3003 23.01.2023-21.05.2023  5 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22GV06
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.01.2023 - 21.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 22.01.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Mikaela Engvall, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 1 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 8 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgifter som finns på moodle gör på egen hand:
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 1, 8 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift, 1,½ - 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 1 h 15 min/studerande
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: ca 33 h
  Eget arbete: 10,5 h
  TOTALT: 40,5 h
  
  RESUSKITATION: 2 sp = 54 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberädande för examination.
  
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Radiation safety: 0-5

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 1 BM18KB06-3002 20.09.2022-18.12.2022  6 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the nursing woman, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills in identifying deviations and dealing with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in cooperation with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 2 BM18KB07-3002 01.01.2023-31.05.2023  6 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the nursing woman, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills in identifying deviations and dealing with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in cooperation with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 31.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 3 BM18KB08-3002 01.03.2023-31.12.2023  6 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth and identify abnormalities in it
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - can care for abnormal delivery and risk delivery in a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.03.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  30.01.2023 - 28.02.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3008 30.01.2023-19.03.2023  4 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Penttinen, Ulla. Kurskompendium på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, kunskapsverkstäder, självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.01.2023 - 19.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 29.01.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras genom två deltenter
  
  Kurstentamina:
  
  Omtentamina 2023: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp
  Föreläsningar, tenter ca 30 h
  Eget arbete ca 78 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3001 03.10.2022-15.01.2023  4 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Penttinen, Ulla. Kurskompendium på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, kunskapsverkstäder, självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2022 - 15.01.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 04.10.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-1
  • SSK22-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras genom två deltenter och ett skriftligt arbete
  
  Kurstentamina:
  vecka 50/2022 fre 16.12
  vecka 2/2023
  
  Omtentamina 2023:
  20.1
  10.2
  10.3
  21.4 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp
  Föreläsningar, verkstäder, tenter ca 30 h
  Eget arbete ca 78 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3002 10.10.2022-31.01.2023  4 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Penttinen, Ulla. Kurskompendium på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, kunskapsverkstäder, självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.10.2022 - 31.01.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 10.10.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras genom två deltenter och ett skriftligt arbete
  
  Kurstentamina:
  vecka 50/2022 fre 16.12
  vecka 2/2023
  
  Omtentamina 2023:
  20.1
  10.2
  10.3
  21.4 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp
  Föreläsningar, verkstäder, tenter ca 30 h
  Eget arbete ca 78 h (not translated)

•   Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period BM18KB02-3002 26.09.2022-18.12.2022  9 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during puerperium
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the mother's and the child's care during puerperium and document it according to national documentation systems
  - can work family-centered in the support of the new family
  - can create a good care relationship with the woman and her family and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within postnatal care
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in postnatal care.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 17.11.2022

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical midwifery in an optional context 1 VÅV18KVV19-3002 30.01.2023-31.12.2023  3 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within optional midwife context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good nursing care relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the nursing care team

  Prerequisites

  Clinical care during the postnatal period
  Clinical care of the pregnant women
  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery in an optional context

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in optional midwifery context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.01.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  31.12.2022 - 29.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical midwifery in an optional context 2 BM18KB11-3002 30.01.2023-31.12.2023  3 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within selected midwife context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Clinical care during the postnatal period
  Clinical care of the pregnant women
  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery in an optional context

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in optional midwifery context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.01.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  31.12.2022 - 29.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV21KVV05-3005 03.10.2022-27.11.2022  4 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - can explain the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  Drug treatment 1
  Care of the old and geriatrics

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2022 - 27.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 05.10.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Mikaela Engvall, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Drug calculation test
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Resuscitation test.
  Arrhythmia: passed Moodle test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Drug calculation test
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Moodle arrhythmia test according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 sp Totalt 108 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 1 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 8 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgifter som finns på moodle gör på egen hand:
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 1, 8 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift, 1,½ - 2 h
  Deltagande i seniormässan4.10: 6 h, 3 h / studerande
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 1 h 15 min/studerande
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: ca 33 h
  Eget arbete: 7,5 h
  TOTALT: 40,5 h
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp = 27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  8 h + 8 h reserverade för klinisk examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  HJÄRTARYTMIER: 0,25 sp (6,75 h)
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1,5 sp = 40,5 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK

•   Degree Project 1 VÅV21EX01-3005 20.02.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  HVV21FU01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the topic of Thesis
  See also literature in method courses

  Learning methods

  An introduction lecture to the course will be held. The course is mainly done as selfdirected studies with possibility to supervision. the presentation of the plan for the thesis is the examination
  
  the content of the work plan for thesis:
  Novia titlepage
  Table of content
  Introduction
  Background (description of the topic, at least 5-6 scientific studies)
  Aim and problem definition
  Method (Data collection based on 2 references/discuss method of selection)
  Ethical consideration (based on references)
  Timetable
  Reference list
  Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
  Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis)
  
  1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle (no key needed)
  2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
  3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest and motivation of studying it.
  4. Background shall be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters where description of concepts and the topic of the subject. In the background you also describe the previous research done
  5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
  6. The method can be described on 2-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
  7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. refer to relevant documents on Finnish National advicory board on Research Integrity TENK. (tenk.fi)
  8. Time plan should estimate how Thesis proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
  9. Works cited

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For an approved Thesis plan the requirements stipulated above should fulfilled

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.02.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 19.02.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  start well in advance

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation av en plan på semianriet.
  bedöms GK/UK

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered but is not necessary always that

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation of work plan for thesis in May

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 3 cu which is equivalent to about 80 h work for the student out of which 10 are scheduled

  Content scheduling

  Individueal planning is part of the process

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  The plan fulfills the above stipulated requirements = GK, which mean PASS

•   Developmental project in midwifery BM14FU04-3005 29.08.2022-31.05.2023  5 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in midwifery

  Prerequisites

  Thesis 2

  Content of the study unit

  Developmental project in midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the chosen theme

  Learning methods

  Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The development work is evaluated 1-5
  Criteria for evaluation
  Starting point for and goal of the development work
  The theoretical foundation of development work
  Area of ​​use for the development work
  Critical review of development work, process and product

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 31.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 05.09.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Seats

  8 - 12

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The lectures are compulsory.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation of development work

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation of development work week 47 year 2022 or in May 2023

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 h lecture
  4 h + 4 h seminars
  123 h individual work, with supervision

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
  The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
  Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
  Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
  The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
  The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
  The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
  The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
  The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
  Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.
  
  The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
  The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
  The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
  The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3010 29.08.2022-09.10.2022  4 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 28.08.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3012 29.08.2022-09.10.2022  4 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after differenst sections

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 28.08.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3013 29.08.2022-16.10.2022  4 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 16.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3014 29.08.2022-27.11.2022  4 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after differenst sections

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 27.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 26.10.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3005 01.08.2022-31.12.2022  3 credits  (ÖH22FLEX-USS) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifter Gk+/Gk /UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 70% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH22FLEX-USS

  Seats

  10 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  Two-day praktikum injection part:
  The teaching is carried out as contact studies in the university of applied sciences, in the exercise class
  Mandatory attendance 100%
  Workwear on

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual theory test as agreed with the group at the start of the course
  Counting after completed counting workshops
  Re-examinations on re-examination days in the spring as announced after the start of the course
  Clinical examination in injections in connection with exercises

  Student's schedule and workload

  Assignments Gk+/Gk /UK Virtual exam scale -0-5 ( 70% right for pass)
  Drug bill 100% right for GK

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3001 07.11.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.11.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 08.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  Uppgifter Gk+/Gk /UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 70% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3003 11.10.2022-11.12.2022  3 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual theory test 80 % correct
  Drug calculation test 100% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.10.2022 - 11.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 10.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-2

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Josephine Åberg, Tiia Finne

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Web based assignments
  Virtual theory test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 33 hours
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and reading for exam.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3004 24.10.2022-11.12.2022  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual theory test 80 % correct
  Drug calculation test 100% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.10.2022 - 11.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 23.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Josephine Åberg, Tiia Finne, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Web based assignments
  Virtual theory test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 33 hours
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3006 05.12.2022-29.01.2023  3 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual theory test 70 % correct
  Drug calculation test 100% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.12.2022 - 29.01.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 06.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-1

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Tiia Finne

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Web based assignments
  Virtual theory test
  Exam in drug calculation ( class exam)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 33 hours / incl groupwork and clinical exercises
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work as well as reading for exam

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 70 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3003 23.01.2023-19.03.2023  2 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.01.2023 - 19.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H (cr

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3007 20.03.2023-23.04.2023  2 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.03.2023 - 23.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 19.03.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H (cr

•   English VÅV22EN01-3009 24.04.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.04.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 23.04.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Språkservice 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   English VÅV22EN01-3001 31.10.2022-11.12.2022  3 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.10.2022 - 11.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 30.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Engelska 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   English VÅV14EN01-3018 31.10.2022-27.11.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.10.2022 - 27.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2021 - 01.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  Active participation is required.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3019 03.10.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 02.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Engelska 1

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV22EN01-3003 02.01.2023-05.03.2023  3 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 05.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Språkservice 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   Family health care VÅV21HV03-3002 01.03.2023-31.05.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.03.2023 - 31.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 28.02.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Written assignment
  Approved practical exercises
  Approved drug calculations

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV21HV03-3003 16.01.2023-14.05.2023  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.01.2023 - 14.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 15.01.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Written assignment
  Approved practical exercises
  Approved drug calculations

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3007 19.09.2022-23.10.2022  4 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 23.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 22.09.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2022
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27hours/cr

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3010 31.10.2022-04.12.2022  4 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.10.2022 - 04.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 30.10.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2022
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours /cr

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3004 02.01.2023-05.03.2023  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 05.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3001 07.11.2022-10.12.2022  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.11.2022 - 10.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 06.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3003 06.03.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.03.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3003 01.08.2022-31.12.2022  2 credits  (ÖH22FLEX-USS) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 15.09.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH22FLEX-USS

  Small group(s)

  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 10. Open university: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 10. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54 h

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3012 17.04.2023-21.05.2023  2 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  17.04.2023 - 21.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 16.04.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time
  Group assinment

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3001 12.09.2022-16.10.2022  2 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 16.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-1

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 h = 54 h

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3002 12.09.2022-16.10.2022  2 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2022 - 16.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 02.10.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 h = 54 h

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3004 09.01.2023-26.02.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.01.2023 - 26.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V
  • SSK22-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time, group assignment

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Samarbetskurs med Vamk (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   Gynaecological midwifery care VÅV18KVV18-3002 26.09.2022-18.12.2022  6 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the gynecological patient's care, and document this
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in gynecological care context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Gynaecological midwifery care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in gynaecological context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 15.12.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Health Technology and service design VÅV21KV03-3006 29.08.2022-18.12.2022  2 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights into the various uses of health and welfare technology in healthcare
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective
  - has basic knowledge of service design in social and health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Health technology as a resource in healthcare
  Service design

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Studymaterial and recommended literature on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, assignments and selfstudy modules

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graded from 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.06.2022 - 28.08.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54h
  Lectures in class 10h + 2h for examination
  Time for assignments and selfstudies 42h

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3015 17.04.2023-11.06.2023  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  17.04.2023 - 11.06.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 16.04.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w.
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3019 17.04.2023-28.05.2023  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  17.04.2023 - 28.05.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 16.04.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w.
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3010 29.08.2022-25.09.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2019/2020. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 25.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course 22nd of September 2022
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams 28th of October and 25th of November 2022

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3012 07.11.2022-11.12.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.11.2022 - 11.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 10.11.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w. 49
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams 20th of January and 10th of February 2023

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3018 29.08.2022-09.10.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2019/2020. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 01.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar on the last lecture of the course 6th of October
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams:
  25th of November and 9th of December 2022

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (8h) = 28 h
  53 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

•   High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical midwifery BM18KB04-3002 01.01.2023-31.12.2023  6 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights on midwifery knowledge during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant puerperium
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant puerperium

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice with women with highrisk pregnancy, -delivery or postnatal period.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3009 01.01.2023-31.07.2023  4 credits  (ÖH22FLEX-USS) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Pitkänen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självständiga studier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 baserat på resultat i tentamen. Virtuella tester bedöms godkänt/underkänt. För godkänt vitsord i kursen krävs godkända vitsord i alla delar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 31.07.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 15.12.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH22FLEX-USS

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursexaminationer:
  Deltentamen 1 den 17.2 2023
  Deltentamen 2 den 2.5 2023
  
  Omtentamen för deltentamen 1:
  10.3 och 31.3.2023
  
  Omtentamen för deltentamen 2:
  26.5 och 25.8.2023
  
  Obligatorisk deltagande i workshops och seminarier enligt schema
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 108 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3001 29.08.2022-20.11.2022  4 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självständiga studier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 baserat på resultat i tentamen. Virtuella tester bedöms godkänt/underkänt. För godkänt vitsord i kursen krävs godkända vitsord i alla delar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 20.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursexamination 17.11.2022
  Omtentamen: första tillfället 20.01.2023 och andra tillfället: 10.03.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 108 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3003 05.09.2022-27.11.2022  4 credits  (USS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.