Study Guide

Objective

Student
- immerses own knowledge in selected alternative by analyzing the latest research and actualities as well as describing the quality aspects in the field.

The course runs parallel with the clinical course so the work can be anchored in practice.

Content

Selected area/ modality

Location and time

Autumn 2023

Materials

Relevant scientific articles
Relevant literature based on the area of focus

Teaching methods

Lectures
Independent studies with supervision
Discussions

Exam schedules

Autumn 2023

Completion alternatives

Written assignment

Student workload

3 cr corresponds to 81 hours of work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Acceptable individual written assignment

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The extent of the written assignment is not satisfactory
The written assignment does not have enough scientific references
The student did not follow the guidelines for written assignments

Qualifications

Clinical basic care, Clinical radiography 2, Clinical radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical radiotherapy and Studiemodule Patient in clinical radiography