•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication RBA22IN01-3003 02.09.2024-17.11.2024  4 credits  (UBA24D-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
    - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
    - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
    - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
    - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
    Prerequisites
    No prior knowledge required
    Content of the study unit
    Study information and information retrieval
    Learning in an academic context
    Data protection and data security
    Swedish 3 credits:
    Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
    Reliable source material and source criticism
    Oral and written presentation
    Email management and the use of social media in nursing care
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Kommunikation:Underkänd
    Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Further information
    Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Carina Gädda

    Learning material

    Kommunikation
    Novias anvisningar för examensarbeten.
    Material på Moodle. (not translated)

    Learning methods

    Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test ( library/ informationservice)

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Kommunikation

    Studerande
    - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
    känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
    - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
    Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat.
    Förkunskapskrav
    Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    02.09.2024 - 17.11.2024

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 29.09.2024

    Group(s)
    • UBA24D-V
    • URS24D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Katarina Vironen, Mikaela Engvall, Carina Gädda, Miranda Ekholm

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Kommunikation: Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen.
    Introduktion: On-line tent i informationssökning samt i inroduktionskursens material (not translated)

    Timing and attendance

    Introduction to academic studies:According to schedule

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Kommunikation:Underkänd
    Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
    Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Kommunikation:
    Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
    • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
    • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
    • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)