Thesis, presentation and maturity test (3 cr)
Code: RA16EX03-3003
General information
Enrollment
15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023
Timing
04.09.2023 - 15.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy
Teachers
- Camilla Ribacka
- Katarina Vironen
- Anita Kvist
Teacher in charge
Camilla Ribacka
Groups
-
URS20D-VRöntgenskötare (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student
- can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
- can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing
Content
The research process
Presentation of thesis and acting as opponent
Maturity exam
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team
Qualifications
Study module Research process