Skip to main content

Nuclear Medical Bioanalysis and Radiation Safety (3 cr)

Code: BAA22BI07-3002

General information


Enrollment

15.06.2023 - 30.09.2023

Timing

18.09.2023 - 08.11.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Virtual portion

1 op

Mode of delivery

67 % Contact teaching, 33 % Distance learning

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages

  • Svenska

Seats

0 - 15

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

Teachers

  • Camilla Ribacka
  • Radiografi och strålbehandling 1

Teacher in charge

Camilla Ribacka

Groups

  • UBA22D-V
    Bioanalytiker (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa

Objective

The students
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
- know the basic principles of radiation safety
- know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Use of gamma camera
The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
Nuclear medical pathology
Radiation safety
Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

Location and time

Autumn 2023

Materials

According to the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lectures and group assignment

Exam schedules

Course examination the 3rd of November 2023.
Re-take on Friday 8.12.2023 and Friday 19.01.2024

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 81 h

Further information

More information is found in Moodle

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam. The calculation test is graded passed or failed. In order to pass the course both exam and the calculation test need to be passed

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject.
Calculation test failed

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology