•   Thesis 2 BAA22EX02-3001 06.01.2025-25.05.2025  6 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The students
    - understand the meaning of scientific thinking.
    - are able to plan and carry out a scientific work.
    - have insights into the research process and problem solution.
    - are able to look for, retrieve and apply scientific publications.
    - command scientific ducumentation.
    - are able to produce, present and defend a scientific work.
    - are able to analyze and evaluate an investigation.
    - are able to critically evaluate their own activities.
    Prerequisites
    Theoretical studies
    Basic practice courses
    Content of the study unit
    Producing research work
    Supervision of thesis work
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Camilla Ribacka

    Learning material

    Course literature:
    Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Learning methods

    Self-studies
    Seminar

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Students follow the instructions for the mid-seminar.
    The data collection must be completed and the data analysis started for passing.
    Those who cannot participate (or have not progressed far enough in the EA process) will receive a passed grade when the completed thesis is presented.

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    06.01.2025 - 25.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 30.03.2025

    Group(s)
    • UBA22D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Camilla Ribacka

    Additional information

    Thesis plan should be accepted before the student take part of the Mid-seminar

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    5.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    Approved/Rejected

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Kursen Examensarbete 2 godkänns senast i samband med presentation och godkännande av färdigt examensarbete. (not translated)

    Practical training and working life co-operation

    Topic for thesis.

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Mandatory presence at the Mid-seminar according to schedual

    Timing and attendance

    Spring 2025

    Student's schedule and workload

    27 h/cr corresponds to 162 h

    Assessment criteria
    Approved / Failed

    Passed:
    The structure of the thesis is according to instructions.
    The background is relevant and informative, and motivates the choice of research topic
    The aim and research questions have a clear delimitation
    The collection of data material and the analysis of the data is ongoing
    The references are relevant and relates to the aim and research questions
    The list of references are done correctly according to instructions given for writing a thesis