•   The Basics of Bioanalysis 1 BAA22LV01-3003 30.09.2024-30.11.2024  3 credits  (UBA24D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The students
    - are familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
    - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
    - have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
    - are familiar with quality development and management
    -realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
    - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
    - see its role and responsibility as a professional to work for global sustainable social development
    Prerequisites
    None
    Content of the study unit
    Health care and social welfare in Finland
    Different organizations
    Different aspects of sustainable development
    Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
    Reference range, type of specimen
    Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
    Occupational safety, legislation
    Laboratory equipment
    Specimen collection procedures
    Performing capillary puncture
    Microbiological, cytological specimens,
    Venipuncture
    Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
    Specimen handling and storage
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Mikaela Engvall

    Learning material

    Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)

    Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)

    Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)

    An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).

    Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).

    More material provided on Moodle.

    Learning methods

    Föreläsningar, diskussioner, egna studier (not translated)

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Godkända uppgifter.

    Studeranden ska känna till de vanligaste undersökningarna inom klinisk kemi, kl. mikrobiologi och kl. fysiologi. Studeranden kan förbereda och handleda patienten inför provtagning samt kan observera patientens tillstånd efter provtagning. (not translated)

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    30.09.2024 - 30.11.2024

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 31.10.2024

    Group(s)
    • UBA24D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Mikaela Engvall

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Practical training and working life co-operation

    Vasanejdens bioanalytiker rf (VASLY) deltar i kursen och berättar om förbundet samt bioanalytikerns yrke.
    Facebook: Vasly
    Instagram: vaasanseudunbioanalyytikot (not translated)

    Timing and attendance

    Autumn 2024
    YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

    Student's schedule and workload

    27 timmar x 3 sp = 81 h (not translated)

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Tentamen
    har ytlig kunskap i bioanalytikens grunder men visar en viss förståelse av ämnet om än bristfällig

    Övningsarbete
    Den studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna. Den studerande visar begränsad till bristfällig kunskap i allmän kemi (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Tentamen
    kan redogöra för ämnet utan att använda endast litteraturens ord
    förstår det mesta av ämnet
    har en del egna synpunkter och kan relatera en del av kunskapen till en liknande situation
    kan motivera en del av sina påståenden och ståndpunkter
    kan ge en del egna exempel

    Övningsarbete
    Den studerande har följt anvisningarna till största delen för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar det mesta av substansen. Tillämpningen är delvis begränsad.
    Hen kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Tentamen
    har fördjupad kunskap i ämnet
    kan analysera och tolka ämnesfakta
    behärskar ämnet mångsidigt
    kommer med egna goda exempel

    Övningsarbete
    Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hen behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället om det så krävs. (not translated)