Mikaela Engvall
Course book:
Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. J. P. Greer, D. A. Arber, et. al.;
Chapter 1: Examination of the Blood and Bone
Chapter 2: Clinical Flow Cytometry
Section 1 Hematopoiesis
Section 3 Granulocytes and Monocytes
Section 4 The Lymphocytes
Additional recommended books:
Wintrobe's Atlas of Clinical Hematology. B. Weksler.;
Chapter 1 Approach to the Microscopic evaluation of Blood and Bone Marrow
Practical Flow Cytometry in Haematology Diagnosis. M. Leach, M. Drummond, and A. Doig.;
Principles of Flow Cytometry, Limitations, Normal Blood and Bone Marrow Populations
Web based studies - Online
Self studies/tutorials.
The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam and virtual tests
English
23.10.2023 - 15.12.2023
15.06.2023 - 25.10.2023
0 - 35
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Mikaela Engvall
The introduction lecture is mandatory.
Content:
The Blood Film and Count (Automated Cell Analysis)
Hemoglobin & Red Cell Indices
Hematocrit & Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Blood Smear (normal findings)
Morphology of normal Blood Cells: Assessing normal Red Blood Cells, White Cells and Platelets
Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Science
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
Virtual test on Moodle
Novia, Vasa
Autumn 2023
Web based learning
Introduction lecture is mandatory.
1 credit is 27 hours
This course is 3 credits x 27h = 81h work.
25h lectures (theory)
16h Individually work
5h Searching of articles
32h Own work (self assessments, reading for the exam)
3h Tentamina 3h
Inadequate knowledge in basics of hematology.
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading).
The student answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature and has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
Written assignments
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignments. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the substance.
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views.
Written assignments
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignments and shows insufficient knowledge about the topic. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited.
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.
Written assignments
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)