Study Guide

Objective

Student
- mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
- can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
- can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
- has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
- mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
- mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
- can identify women with childbearing fears and have basic knowledge of the care of childbearing fears

Content

Antenatal care

Location and time

September 2022 and January 2023..

Materials

Paananen m.fl. (2015). Kätilötyö. Edita.
Lindgren m.fl. (2016). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentlitteratur.
Nationella expertgruppen för mödravården (Förf.) (2015) Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (Red.)
Handbok för mödrarådgivningen - Nationell rekommendation
Tillgänglig från http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/126655
Naistentaudit ja synnykset. toim. Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O. & Mäkikallio, K. 2019, Duodecim
Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

Teaching methods

Lectures and discussions, group work, self-studies.
Webinar about cultural sensitivity in midwifery context, within the Nordplus network Freja.

Exam schedules

Written exam autumn 2022.

Completion alternatives

Written examnination
Individual assignment
Group work
Mandatory attendance at lectures in Postpatrum check-up in January 2023.
Mandatory attendance at conference about cultural sensitivity in September 2022.

Student workload

27h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1-2
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

For passing the course, an approved examination (at least 60% right) and approved assignments are required.

Qualifications

Antenatal care 1