•   Methods of Development and Evaluation HCS21EB03-3001 29.09.2022-27.11.2022  5 credits  (SHV21HD-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    After completing the course, the student is able to:
    - Define structure, service and outcome quality and meaning of quality assurance from the different perspectives
    - Identify and apply prevailing quality assessment methods and quality standards within social and health care
    - Describe the most central quality management systems within social- and health care
    - Integrate quality assurance and quality improvement to her/his professional duties
    - Plan and implement evaluation of one’s work field/activity/operation
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    - Perspective on quality management, quality policy, quality system
    - Quality standards within social and health care organization
    - Quality assurance, quality improvement and control as well as methods for constant quality improvement
    - Central quality management systems in Finland within social and health care
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Marica Hinders

    Learning material

    To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

    Learning methods

    Lectures, group discussion, case study

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    The basis for the course's examination consists of:
    - Two written individual submissions, graded according to 0-5
    - Two group discussions based on given literature, assessed according to GK/UK

    Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    29.09.2022 - 27.11.2022

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2022 - 28.09.2022

    Group(s)
    • SHV21HD-V
    • SHV21HD-Å
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Marica Hinders

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Case assignment
    Group discussions

    Timing and attendance

    Autumn 2022
    Blended learning
    Compulsory seminar

    2.9. kl 13-16
    29.9 kl 9-12
    27.10 kl 9-12 Seminar

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 ECTS credit = 27 hours work.

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
    The literature is referenced
    Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
    The technical design is satisfactory.
    Refers concepts and basic principle
    Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The questions are answered.
    The methodological literature is applied.
    The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
    The technical design is good
    Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
    The literature is analyzed and applied.
    The reflection is scientifically analytical.
    The technical design is commendable.
    Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
    Makes versatile use of literature
    Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically