•   Technical Documentation IT23CS01-3001 08.01.2024-25.02.2024  3 credits  (ITE23D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - can report and document within the area of ​​competence.
    - is familiar with writing and layout rules and knows the style level that is appropriate in a formal text.
    - can plan an assignment and make associated documentation using critically selected sources of various kinds.
    - knows how to document practical and theoretical knowledge in the field of study.
    - master one or more reference systems.
    Prerequisites
    Inga förkunskapskrav
    Content of the study unit
    - Information retrieval
    - the work process for more extensive reporting such as degree projects
    - reference systems
    - evaluation of reports
    - rules for written reports and scientific work.

    - Application according to specific education may occur.
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Lack of attendance, incompleted assignments, failed final exam.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Kaj Wikman

    Learning methods

    This course equips students with essential skills for effective technical communication. Students will learn to create clear and user-friendly technical documentation across various formats. By the course's end, students will be proficient in producing quality technical documentation and enhancing their employability in technical communication roles.

    Teaching methods: contact studies

    Prerequisites: None

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Continuous assessment: students are assessed throughout the course
    -participation in in-class activities, individual assignments, group work, and final exam

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    08.01.2024 - 25.02.2024

    Enrollment date range

    14.12.2023 - 05.01.2024

    Group(s)
    • ITE23D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Hanna Kuusisto

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Information Technology, Degree Programme in Information Technology

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    FInal exam

    Timing and attendance

    Please see the schedule for more detailed information

    Student's schedule and workload

    27 hours individual workload per 1 credit (a total of 3 ETCS)

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Lack of attendance, incompleted assignments, failed final exam.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Students who receive a grade of 1 or 2 demonstrate a below-average understanding of the course material. Their technical documentation may lack clarity, organization, or usability. Their work shows a limited application of technical writing principles. They may have difficulty actively participating in class discussions or meeting expectations consistently.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Students who receive a grade of 3 demonstrate an acceptable level of understanding of the course material. They produce technical documentation that meets basic requirements in terms of clarity, organization, and usability. While there may be some room for improvement, their work reflects a satisfactory application of technical writing principles. They participate adequately in class discussions and meet most expectations.

    Students who receive a grade of 4 consistently demonstrate a solid understanding of the course material. They consistently produce high-quality technical documentation that is clear, well-organized, and user-friendly. Their work shows proficiency in applying technical writing principles and best practices. They actively participate in class discussions, contribute valuable insights, and consistently meet or exceed expectations.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Students who receive a grade of 5 consistently demonstrate exceptional mastery of the course material. They consistently produce outstanding technical documentation that showcases clarity, organization, and usability. Their work exhibits a deep understanding of the principles and best practices of technical writing. They actively participate in class discussions, engage in critical thinking, and consistently exceed expectations.