Irén Vikström-Dahl
Kela, the social institution of Finland. Available at: http://www.kela.fi/documents/10180/578772/Kela_Yleisesite_EN_WEB.pdf/60019393-183a-40ff-9325-e4cdabb54790
Säkkinen, S. (2010). Fact about social welfare and health care in Finland 2010. Available at: http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79913/facts2010.pdf?sequence=1
The ministry of social affairs and health care, Finland: http://stm.fi/en/publications
National Institute of Health and Welfare, Finland https://www.thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en
Information and literature at Moodle
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Duffy, J. R. 2013. Quality Caring in Nursing and Health Systems. Implications for Clinicians, Educators, and Leaders. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10687047
Kalra, J. 2011. Medical Errors and Patient Safety. Strategies to reduce and disclose medical errors and improve patient safety. De Gruyter. U.S.A (Online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10486525
Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook Central)
Marr, H. & Giebing, H. 1994. Quality Assurance in Nursing Concepts. Methods and Case studies. Campion Press. Edinburgh.
Boström, A-M., Nordström, G. & Wilde-Larsson, B. red. 2017. Kvalitetsarbete för bättre och säkrare vård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Waterson, P. 2014. Patient Safety Culture; Theory, methods and application (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10989175
Pauley J.A. & Pauley J.F. 2011. Establishing a Culture of Patient Safety: Improving Communication, Building Relationships, and Using Quality Tools (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10929643
Other material and more information about literature can be found in the Moodle course
Lectures, Group assignment, poster exhibition
Patient safety and Quality assurance 2cr with Anita Wikberg:
Lectures, group work, tutorials, online test, seminar
Service Design in Social and Health Care 2cr with Marica Hinders
Lectures, group work, tutorials.
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportaali' P/F P= Pass F= Fail
Written assignment in Patient safety and quality assurance grade 0-5
Criteria for evaluation of written assignment in patietn safety and quality assurance:
Max 40 points
Detailed description of the nature of the ward or practice 3p
Description of background method/model for quality development and reference to source 3p
List of what could be changed or developed 2p
Choice of relevant object to develop/ improve 2p
Relevant background literature (minimum 2) on the topic which will be developed or improved 2p
Detailed description of the process of developing and evaluating applying the chosen method/model 10p
Reflection on how the work promotes patient safety and quality assurance and sustainable development 3+3p
Has used Novia's instruction for writing thesis e.g. references 2p
6 pages texti two students, 9 pages if three students etc. 2p
Extra literature or something extra which was not demanded 2p
PP, Prezi, film or other material 2p
Presentation on seminar 2p
Active participation or good comments on Moodle 2p
1= 21-24
2=25-28
3=29-32
4=33-36
5= 37-40
English
01.11.2021 - 31.12.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
20 - 40
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anita Wikberg, Marica Hinders
Compulsory presence in Patient safety and quality assurance
Test on the Finnish 'patient quality portal' (Potilasturvaportti) on patient safety and quality assurance:
Online test:
Log in to:
https://portal.potilasturvaportti.fi/sv/Account/Open?oo=GUWZHbk999!2f7M71ZAm6Q5YYqkQ4Ma9nCFDccz0QWj2lJNqwkgDJ79U7sWK!2bHEULq
Click Ny användare (=new user)
Choose language
Fill the form and register as a new user
Create a username and key
Choose unit: YH Novia and department: write the name of your group
Click education
Choose the course: Patient safety through skill online
Service Design in Social and Health Care is held in collaboration with VAMK.
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
3.00 credits
H-5
Poster exhibition and oral presentation
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportti'
All the course is available online
Written assignment in a small groups in patiensafety and quality assurance
Service Design in Social and Health Care:
Lectures, group work with cases and seminars.
-
Seminar and poster exibition
Seminars in patient safety and quality assurance
Two retakes on genreal exam days, registration is compulsory
Retake exams are 21th of January and 11th of February 2022 in school
for patient safety and quality assurance:
Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook central)
+ Moodle material
Novia, Vaasa, online
Autumn 2021
w. 43-50
Service Design in Social and Health Care 2cr
Novia, Alere and online.
Patietn safety and quality assurance 2cr
Novia, Alere and online
-
27h/cr
Patient safety and Quality Assurance: 4h introduction + 4h lectures, online test 5h, tutorials and cooperation in a small group 37h, seminar 4h = 54h
Service Design in Social and Health Care: 8h lectures, tutorial and case studies in small groups 42h, seminar 4h =54h
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar