•   Pediatric Nursing NU22CC12-3004 24.03.2025-31.05.2025  3 credits  (NU23D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - obtains knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for children, adolescents and their families
    - obtains knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to neonatal care
    - obtains knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
    - is able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients, with consideration to the age-specific needs of the patient
    - has knowledge about children with special and development needs and can apply their knowledge in the nursing care
    - can prioritize the patient´s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national classification system
    - understand ethics and different cultural needs and learn to treat the patient, and the family, with dignity
    - has insight in patient guidance of the child and their families
    Prerequisites
    First Aid and Basic Nursing
    Clinical Nursing 1
    Content of the study unit
    Most central diseases in children and young people
    Importance of child and family-centered care
    Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
    Identify, evaluate and care for children and adolescent's pain
    In simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and adolescents
    Special and development needs in children, children with special needs (npf)
    Neonatal care
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student cannot account for the literature nor reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has not followed the instructions for written assignment and shows no knowledge about other student's written assignments. The student has not mastered the substance of his/her work.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    riteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Camilla Mattjus

    Learning material

    See Moodle

    Learning methods

    Blended learning and workshops

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    24.03.2025 - 31.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 23.03.2025

    Group(s)
    • NU23D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Small group(s)
    • Group 1 (Size: 15.
    • Group 2 (Size: 15.
    Teachers and responsibilities

    Camilla Mattjus

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Simulations x3 (mandatory)
    Theoretical assignment and/or exam (to be confirmed)
    Pediatric pharmacology and drug calculation

    Timing and attendance

    Spring 2025, at Campus Alere, Novia

    Student's schedule and workload

    3 cr = 81h

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student cannot account for the literature nor reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has not followed the instructions for written assignment and shows no knowledge about other student's written assignments. The student has not mastered the substance of his/her work.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar