•   Diagnostic Radiography 2 RAD22SM01-3003 19.05.2025-16.11.2025  13 credits  (URS24D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student
    -should show good knowledge in X-ray, the imaging technology and native projections.
    -has basic knowledge of the flouroscopy technology and the most common screening studies
    -has basic knowledge of mammography examinations and photography techniques.
    -has basic knowledge of the computed tomography, the technology, examinations and work on computed tomography.
    -has basic insights into using contrast agents and first aid related to them.
    -has basic insights into the magnetic resonance imaging technology, in the use of MRI and deep-knowing in safety issues.
    -has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
    -understands the importance of good patient care,patient-centered and safe patientcare
    -can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation
    - radiation protection in relevant area
    - measurements
    Prerequisites
    Diagnostic Radiography 1 and Clinical Radiography 1
    Content of the study unit
    -conventional x-ray
    -fluoroscopy
    -mammography
    -computed radiography
    -magnetic tomography
    -contrastmedia and first-aid
    -anatomy
    -patientcare
    - measurements
    - radiationprotection
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Katarina Vironen

    Learning material

    Study material on Moodle
    Additional material according to the lecturer

    Learning methods

    Lectures, discussions, demonstrations and tasks.
    Selfstudies.

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    19.05.2025 - 16.11.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 18.05.2025

    Group(s)
    • URS24D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Katarina Vironen, Radiografi och strålbehandling 1, Heidi Kronqvist, Carina Gädda

    Additional information

    Additional information on Moodle

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Examination

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Course examination
    Part 1
    Part 2

    Timing and attendance

    Spring 2025 and autumn 2025 according to lecture schedule

    Internationa connections

    13 cr corresponds to 351 hours of studies

    Student's schedule and workload

    13 cr corresponds to 351 hours of studies

    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions.