Skip to main content

Leadership, Workplace Culture and Service Design (4 cr)

Code: RB20FU03-3002

General information


Enrollment

01.12.2022 - 19.02.2023

Timing

01.01.2023 - 26.05.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

4 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages

  • Svenska

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy
  • Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

Teachers

  • Mikaela Engvall

Teacher in charge

Mikaela Engvall

Groups

  • UBA20D-V
    Bioanalytiker (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
  • URS20D-V
    Röntgenskötare (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
- have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
- are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
- fundamental insights into entrepreneurship

Content

Organizational activities and leadership
Entrepreneurship

Location and time

Campus Alere Spring 2023

Materials

Rosengren, K. 2014. Vårdledarskap: att utveckla och förbättra framtidens vård och omsorg. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bolman, L. G., Deal, T. E., & Holmqvist, A. (2019). Nya perspektiv på organisation och ledarskap (Sjätte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
Wheelan Susan A., (2017) Att skapa effektiva team. Studentliteratur.
Källerman Helena (2016) Uppdrag mellanchef. Liber

Teaching methods

Online, self studies, individual work, groupwork

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None