•   Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Service Design RBA22FU03-3001 07.04.2025-31.05.2025  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The students
    - are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
    - have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
    - understand the importance of employee competence and the work community
    - are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
    - can function according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional business environment
    - have basic insights into inner entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship in social and health care
    - have insight into developing services that better meet the needs of users.
    Prerequisites
    None
    Content of the study unit
    Organizational activities and leadership
    Entrepreneurship
    Service design
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Carina Gädda

    Learning material

    På svenska
    Rosengren, K. 2014. Vårdledarskap: att utveckla och förbättra framtidens vård och omsorg. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    Bolman, L. G., Deal, T. E., & Holmqvist, A. (2019). Nya perspektiv på organisation och ledarskap (Sjätte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
    Wheelan Susan A., (2017) Att skapa effektiva team. Studentliteratur.
    Källerman Helena (2016) Uppdrag mellanchef. Liber

    Arbetskollektivavtal och arbetarskydd:
    - Allmänt kommunalt tjänste- och arbetskollektivavtal AKTA
    - Arbetarskyddsförvaltningsens webbtjänst
    - Finlex.fi (not translated)

    Learning methods

    Lectures
    Written assignment
    Examinaion

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    07.04.2025 - 31.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    01.12.2024 - 01.04.2025

    Group(s)
    • UBA22D-V
    • URS22D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Carina Gädda

    Additional information

    Introduktioner till kursen och till seminarium har obligatoriska närvaro, närvaro vid alla andra lektioner rekommenderas.

    Att använda AI är inte tillåtet (not translated)

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Timing and attendance

    Alere Spring 2025

    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods