•   The professional paradigm of a Nurse practitioner SHV22AK01-3003 06.09.2024-11.10.2024  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student
    - is able to develop a professional paradigm as an advanced clinical nurse
    - is able to critically analyse and evaluate advanced communication skills with patients/clients and employees
    - is able to apply models for the reflection that shows complex overall needs of patients, family and environment in order to be able to practice the ability for critical analysis and evaluation
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Advanced clinical nursing care
    Critical thinking
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The student did not achieve any of the criteria of academic writing and presentation of his/work
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
    The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Rika Levy-Malmberg

    Learning material

    Boman, E., Levy, M. R., & Fagerström, L. (2020). Differences and similarities in scope of practice between registered nurses and nurse specialists in emergency care: an interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 34(2), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12753
    Boman, E., Glasberg, A.-L., Levy-Malmberg, R., & Fagerström, L. (2019). “Thinking outside the box”: advanced geriatric nursing in primary health care in Scandinavia. BMC Nursing, 18(1), N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0350-2
    Boman, E., Levy, M. R., & Fagerström, L. (2019). Nurses’ understanding of becoming nurse practitioner role in the Norwegian emergency care context: A qualitative study. Nordic Journal of Nursing research. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057158518783166
    Bryant-Lukosius, D., & DiCenso, A. (2004). A framework for the introduction and evaluation of advanced practice nursing roles. Journal of Advanced Nursing (Wiley-Blackwell), 48(5), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03235.x
    Kerr, L., & Macaskill, A. (2020). The journey from nurse to advanced nurse practitioner: applying concepts of role transitioning. British Journal of Nursing, 29(10), 561–565. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.10.561
    Mackey, H., Noonan, K., Kennedy Sheldon, L., Singer, M., & Turner, T. (2018). Oncology Nurse Practitioner Role: Recommendations from the Oncology Nursing Society’s Nurse Practitioner Summit. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 22(5), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1188/18.CJON.516-522

    Learning methods

    Lectures, group discussion

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    0-5

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    06.09.2024 - 11.10.2024

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 05.09.2024

    Group(s)
    • SHV23HD-V
    • SHV23HD-Å
    • SHV24H-Å
    • SHV24H-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Rika Levy-Malmberg, Daniel Nenonen

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Campus

    Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    5.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    The written assignment instruction will be given during the lecture

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    See Moodle

    Timing and attendance

    Autumn 2024

    Student's schedule and workload

    1ECTS=27H

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The student did not achieve any of the criteria of academic writing and presentation of his/work

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points, conduct frail interview, and weak analysis of the results

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable interview, the analysis and the results presentation gave good knowledge about the topic

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding