•   Research methods SHV22FU02-3001 01.09.2022-31.05.2024  10 credits  (SHV22HD-Å, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - understands and is able to use qualitative and quantitative research and development processes and methods
    - is able to apply a scientific and ethical approach in research and development activities
    - is able to carry out a current work life-related development project
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Qualitative research methods
    Quantitative research methods
    Seminars
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    QUALITATIVE METHODS
    Modules 2, 3 and 5:
    The text is fragmented, and it does not answer the questions.
    Literature related to research methods is not used.
    Reflections are missing.
    The technical forming has limitations.
    Module 4:
    Does not present the central concepts and the basic principles.
    Literature related to research methods is not used.
    -------------------------------------------------
    QUANTITATIVE METHODS
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Camilla Strandell-Laine

    Learning material

    LITERATURE FOR THE QUALITATIVE PART OF THE COURSE

    Obligatory literature (suggestions below): student chooses a book which presents the preferred method (if available) and publications related to research integrity.

    General research method books:
    - Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. (2015). Research process in nursing (Seventh edition.). Wiley Blackwell. (e-bok)
    - Parahoo, K., 2006. Nursing Research. Principles, Process and Issues. Second Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    - Holloway, I. (2017). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (4th ed.). Wiley Blackwell. (e-bok)
    - Gibbs, G. R. & Flick, U. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data (Second edition.). Sage.
    - Merriam, S. B. & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (Second edition.). Jossey-Bass.
    - Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, K. & Kääriäinen, M. (2019). The application of content analysis in nursing science research. Springer International Publishing.
    - Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Fourth edition. International student edition.). SAGE.
    - Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press. (e-bok)
    - Hammersley, M. (2013). What is qualitative research? Bloomsbury Academic.
    - Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press. (e-bok)

    Specific research methods:
    - Coughlan, M. & Cronin, P. (2017). Doing a literature review in nursing, health and social care (2nd edition.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
    - King, N., Horrocks, C. & Brooks, J. (2019). Interviews in qualitative research (2nd edition.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
    - Brinkmann, S. (2013). Qualitative interviewing. Oxford University Press.
    - Lawson, H. A. (2015). Participatory action research (First edition.). Oxford University Press. (e-bok)
    - McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd edition.). Routledge.
    - Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., Lofland, L., Deegan, M. J., . . . Lather, P. (2007). Handbook of ethnography ([Uusintapainos].). SAGE Publications.
    - Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4. [updated] ed.). Sage Publications.

    Ethics:
    - Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK): https://www.tenk.fi/en
    - What are Qualitative Research Ethics? (2012). Bloomsbury Academic. (e-bok)
    - Love, K. (2012). Ethics in social research. Emerald.
    - Comstock, G. (2013). Research ethics: A philosophical guide to the responsible conduct of research. Cambridge University Press.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LITERATURE FOR THE QUANTITATIVE PART OF THE COURSE

    Learning methods

    The course is divided into three separate parts; qualitative methods (5 ECTS), quantitative methods (3 ECTS) and method seminar (2 ECTS). Qualitative methods, go as a digital course always in the autumn semester, and quantitative methods with lectures on campus in the spring.

    ________________________________________
    QUALITATIVE METHODS:
    The qualitative part of the course is entirely virtual and is available at Moodle.
    The course at Moodle is divided into five modules:

    Module 1: Introduction and a diagnostic test.

    Module 2: Data collection. Individual/group working. In the group, you choose a data collection method in which you immerse yourself, do a small survey where you use the chosen method and present it to each other according to the instructions on Moodle. In addition, you give feedback to each other regarding the details according to the instructions on Moodle. It is optimal to have three people in the group.

    Module 3: Data analysis. Individual assignment. A student chooses a theme and form a research question. They search for three scientific articles or use the same data as in Module 2 and choose a qualitative analysis method. Student answers their research question using a content analysis and presents the analysis process and findings.

    Module 4: Ethics, data protection and validity. Home exam submitted via Moodle.

    Module 5: Review of a degree thesis. Students choose a higher UAS degree thesis within their own profiling in Theseus (https://www.theseus.fi/). NOTE the programs are slightly different in different UAS. Students read and assess the thesis according to instructions and documents found on Moodle.

    ________________________________________

    QUANTITATIVE METHODS

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    QUALITATIVE METHODS

    Module 1 is assessed as passed/failed. To pass this module, the student needs to answer the diagnostic test.
    Modules 2-5 are assessed using a scale of 0-5.
    Module 2 (weighting 30%)
    - readiness to plan, structure, perform and analyse critically research
    - readiness to compare and critically analyse the objective of collecting and using data
    - readiness to combine theory, practice and reflection
    - readiness to document and logically and structurally present the tasks
    - readiness to peer review
    Module 3 (weighting 30%)
    - readiness to form a research question
    - readiness to search scientific articles/use data
    - readiness to use a qualitative data analysis method
    - readiness to present an analysis process
    - readiness to present findings of the analysis (written and visual presentation)
    Module 4 (weighting 20%)
    - knowledge of basic concepts
    - readiness to variedly clarify questions related to research ethics, data protection and validity using literature related to research methods
    Module 5 (weighting 20%)
    - readiness to analyse using literature related to research methods and review criteria
    - readiness to assess the practical novelty
    - readiness to summarise relevant data
    - critical and constructive reflection

    QUANTITATIVE METHODS

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    01.09.2022 - 31.05.2024

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2022 - 01.09.2022

    Group(s)
    • SHV22HD-Å
    • SHV22HD-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Ralf Lillbacka, Camilla Strandell-Laine, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    QUALITATIVE METHODS
    Module 1: Diagnostic test (Moodle)
    Module 2: Written report (Individual/group assignment) as a PowerPoint form with recorded sound (instructions on Moodle) and peer review. A presentation should include a description of the method, how and when to use the method, pros and cons of the method, and a description of how you used the method (how did you use the method, reflection on the strengths and challenges). Peer review is given to other students in the group according to the instructions on Moodle.
    Module 3: Individual assignment. Student analyses three scientific articles or the same data as in Module 2 using a quantitative analysis method. Student presents their analysis process and findings.
    Module 4: Home exam submitted via Moodle
    Module 5: Individual analysis and review of a degree thesis based on your interest. (conducted according to the instructions on Moodle)

    ________________________________________
    QUANTITATIVE METHODS

    ________________________________________
    METHOD SEMINARS

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    QUALITATIVE METHODS
    The course qualitative research methods can be accomplished under the period 2.9.-31.12.2022. Deadlines per module:
    Module 1: 16.9.2022
    Module 2: 7.10.2022
    Module 3: 4.11.2022
    Module 4: 2.12.2022
    Module 5: 16.12.2022

    QUANTITATIVE METHODS
    The course in quantitative research methods can be accomplished under the period XX.XX.-XX.XX.2023

    Timing and attendance

    Part 1. Qualitative methods are made entirely virtual. The course is available at Moodle 2.9.2021-31.12.2022. The students are recommended to study the course during autumn 2022. Course info (1h), week 35 + 3 x 1h online supervision sessions during the autumn (dates are being informed later).

    Part 2. More information is available in Moodle. The part I realised this through lectures also online. The course is available on Moodle. XX.XX.-XX.XX.2023.
    A compulsory day is arranged on campus with exercises in class (SPSS). Further information about study days can be found on the spring schedule in Moodle. Students are recommended to take the course during the spring semester.

    Part 3. Method seminars, see the schedule for Method seminars and Mather's thesis seminars in Peppi / Moodle.

    Student's schedule and workload

    QUALITATIVE METHODS (5 ECTS = 135 h)
    Course introduction: (course info 1h + getting familiarized with the course) + diagnostic test pn Moodle (=examination) = 10 h
    Data collection: Students are working in groups of 3 people. Every student chooses a data collection method they study and use in their reports according to the instructions on Moodle. Students record 10 minutes of video in which they present the method. The other group members review the group mates' presentations using the review criteria on Moodle. (=examination) = 40 h
    Data analysis: Student choose a theme and forms a research question. They searched three scientific articles, used the same data as in Module 2 and chose a qualitative analysis method. Student answers their research question using content analysis and presents the analysis process and findings (=examination) = 40 h
    Ethics, data protection and validity: Home exam on Moodle (=examination) = 25 h
    Degree thesis: Student searches, reads and analyses one thesis (master's degree) and reviews it using the criteria found on Moodle and writes a report (=examination) = 20 h

    QUANTITATIVE METHODS 3 ECTS = 81 hours

    METHOD SEMINARS 2 ECTS = 54 hours

    Content scheduling

    The course is divided into three parts: qualitative, quantitative, seminars
    Qualitative methods (5 ECTS) is accomplished during the autumn 2022. This part of the course is entirely virtual and can be found on Moodle.
    Quantitative methods (3 ECTS) is accomplished during spring 2023. This part of the course is partly based on lectures.

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    QUALITATIVE METHODS
    Modules 2, 3 and 5:
    The text is fragmented, and it does not answer the questions.
    Literature related to research methods is not used.
    Reflections are missing.
    The technical forming has limitations.
    Module 4:
    Does not present the central concepts and the basic principles.
    Literature related to research methods is not used.
    -------------------------------------------------
    QUANTITATIVE METHODS

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    QUALITATIVE METHODS
    Modules 2, 3 and 5:
    Questions to the answers are vague and narrow.
    Literature related to research methods is referred to.
    Reflections presented are limited.
    The technical forming is satisfactory.
    Module 4:
    - Concepts and fundamental principles are referred to.
    - Is based on primary literature related to research methods.
    ---------------------
    QUANTITATIVE METHODS

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    QUALITATIVE METHODS
    Modules 2, 3 and 5:
    - Questions are being answered.
    - Literature related to research methods is applied.
    - The text is reflective and critical viewpoints can be found.
    - The technical forming is good.
    Module 4:
    - Understands and can clarify the concepts and the basic principles
    - Is based on literature related to research methods and the instructions of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity or international guidelines.
    ---------------------
    QUANTITATIVE METHODS

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    QUALITATIVE METHODS
    Modules 2, 3 and 5:
    - Questions are being answered.
    - Literature related to research methods is applied.
    - The text is reflective and critical viewpoints can be found.
    - The technical forming is good.
    Module 4:
    - Understands and can clarify the concepts and the basic principles
    - Is based on literature related to research methods and the instructions of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity or international guidelines.
    ---------------------
    QUANTITATIVE METHODS