•   Human Resource Management SHV22UL04-3002 21.03.2025-31.05.2025  5 credits  (SHV24H-Å, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - is able to describe and apply theory and practice of human resources from an interdisciplinary perspective
    - is able to lead and promote diversity in the workplace and has the ability to value and develop an inclusive organisational culture
    - in able to organise the business towards a continuous competence development
    - is able to work for a sustainable work community development
    - is able to apply an ethical approach at work
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Working tutorial
    Staff management
    Labor law
    Practical staff administration and collective agreement issues
    Human resource-oriented leadership, employee interviews and work motivation.
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments.
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
    The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Marica Hinders

    Learning material

    Introduced in the course moodle page

    Learning methods

    Lectures, individual studies and group work.
    Blended learning

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    21.03.2025 - 31.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 31.12.2024

    Group(s)
    • SHV24H-Å
    • SHV24H-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Marica Hinders

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Campus

    Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Case studies
    Self studies
    Group Work

    Timing and attendance

    Blended learning.
    21.3 kl 9-12
    4.4. kl 12.30-15.30
    24.4. kl 9-12
    22.5 kl 12.30-15.30

    Student's schedule and workload

    1c = 27h
    5c= 135h

    Lectures (9h), Online or at Campus
    Individual studies (122h) Individiual studies and group work.
    Seminar (4h). Online or at Campus

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
    The literature is referenced
    Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
    The technical design is satisfactory.
    Refers concepts and basic principle
    Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The questions are answered.
    The methodological literature is applied.
    The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
    The technical design is good
    Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
    The literature is analyzed and applied.
    The reflection is scientifically analytical.
    The technical design is commendable.
    Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
    Makes versatile use of literature
    Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically