•   Developing Quality Management and Safety Culture SHV24RS01-3001 01.01.2025-31.05.2025  5 credits  (SHV24H-Å, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - Is able to critically evaluate and present safety culture in clinical radiography
    - Is able to manage it safety culture in clinical radiography
    - Is ethical and cost-effective in clinical radiography
    - Is able to describe and apply quality management models and theories in clinical radiography
    - Is able to describe and apply concepts and principles of safety culture in clinical radiography
    - Is s able to use the most general evaluation methods in clinical radiography
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Safety culture in clinical radiography
    Ethics and cost-effectiveness in clinical radiography
    Quality management models in clinical radiography
    Evaluation methods in clinical radiography
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
    The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Katarina Vironen

    Learning material

    According to the lecturer's instructions

    Learning methods

    Virtual studies

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    01.01.2025 - 31.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 16.09.2024

    Group(s)
    • SHV24H-Å
    • SHV24H-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Katarina Vironen

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Campus

    Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
    The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)