•   Research Methodology and Project Work SOV22UVR106-3007 11.11.2024-31.01.2025  3 credits  (USO24D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The Student:
    - has basic insights into knowledge theory, theory of science, research, and development methodology
    - understands the research process and how the different parts interact with each other
    -has basic skills in carrying out projects, research and development work
    -understand and can describe in qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
    Prerequisites
    No previous knowledge
    Content of the study unit
    -basic science theory and research and development methodology concepts
    -general logical rules and methodological principles and methods for data collection and analysis
    -the basics of project activities
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The student lacks fundamental knowledge of epistemology, research methodology, project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
    The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Ralf Lillbacka

    Learning material

    Recommended literature:
    Ahnlund, P. & Sauer, L. 2021. Att forska i socialt arbete. Utmaningar, förhållningssätt och metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. According to instructions.
    Denscombe, M. 2016. Forskningshandboken - för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    Eklund, S. 2010. Arbeta i projekt - individen, gruppen, ledaren. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    Patel, R. & Davidson, R. (1994 eller senare upplaga). Forskningsmetodikens grunder. Att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 2. upplagan.
    Rosing, H. (1984 eller tidigare upplaga) Vetenskapens logiska grunder. Hangö: Schildts.
    Other literature suggested by the examiner.

    Learning methods

    Lectures and small scale exercises

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Through the assignment and/or the written test, the student is expected to demonstrate fundamental knowledge of epistemology, research methodology, as well as scientific critique and assessment of sources

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    11.11.2024 - 31.01.2025

    Enrollment date range

    01.10.2024 - 11.11.2024

    Group(s)
    • USO24D-V
    Teachers and responsibilities

    Ralf Lillbacka

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Written assignments, alternatively a written test.

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    The written assignments must be submitted before the end date of the course, alternatively the written test is held before the end date.

    Timing and attendance

    See schedule

    Student's schedule and workload

    27 h per credit, 81 h in total.

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The student lacks fundamental knowledge of epistemology, research methodology, project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The student has limited knowledge of epistemology, research methodology and project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The student demonstrates good knowledge of epistemology, research methodology and project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The student demonstrates excellent knowledge of epistemology, research methodology, project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources