•   German 1 VAL23099-3001 01.03.2023-30.04.2024  3 credits +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - learns how to communicate in German within the profession
    - has knowledge of the demography, geography and business life in Germany
    - can communicate in German in daily situations
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Lack of attendance, incompleted assignments, failed final exam.
    Further information
    Som alla små länder är Finland väldigt beroende av sin utrikeshandel och Tyskland har länge varit en av Finlands viktigaste handelspartners. I Europa har 100 miljoner människor tyska som modersmål och jobbar du med internationell handel i framtiden kommer du högst antagligen att träffa en tysk handelspartner under din karriär. (not translated)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Katja Bonäs

    Learning material

    Course book: Ausblicke 1 (Nilsson, Raab, Braun) ISBN 978-91-523-1834-8. Sanoma Utbildning 2016.
    Students need to acquire the book before the course start

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    continuous assessment: students are being assessed throughout the course (participation in the online activities, individual assignments)
    -final exam

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    01.03.2023 - 30.04.2024

    Enrollment date range

    01.02.2023 - 07.03.2023

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Katja Bonäs

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Business Administration

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Student's schedule and workload

    Student workload: a total of 81 hours, whereof 32 hours of contact teaching in class and 45 hours of individual work.

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Lack of attendance, incompleted assignments, failed final exam.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The student understands common words and simple phrases in plain, simple language
    at a slow pace and in short, simple texts about everyday and familiarity
    substances. The student shows his/her understanding by
    explaining the content in a very simple form and by acting with acceptable results
    based on messages and instructions in the content.
    In oral and written presentations of various kinds
    the student expresses himsef/herself simply and understandably with single words and phrases. In order to
    clarify and vary their communication, the student processes, and does
    occasional simple improvements to own representations.
    The student comments in a very simple form some phenomena in different
    contexts and areas where the language is used, and does
    simple comparisons with their own experiences and knowledge.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The student understands common words and simple phrases in everyday language
    at a slow pace and in short texts about everyday life. The student shows his/her understanding by
    explaining the content and by acting with acceptable results
    based on messages and instructions in the content.
    In oral and written presentations of various kinds
    the student is more fluent with words and phrases. In order to
    clarify and vary their communication, the student processes, and does
    occasional simple improvements to own representations.
    The student comments in relatively simple form some phenomena in different
    contexts and areas where the language is used, and does further
    comparisons with own experiences and knowledge.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The student understands common words and phrases in clearly spoken everyday language
    at a normal pace and in longer texts about everyday life. The student shows his/her understanding by:
    explaining the content using fluent language and by acting with desirable results
    based on messages and instructions in the content.
    In oral and written presentations of various kinds
    the student expresses himself/herself very clearly with varying and more complicated words and phrases. In order to
    clarify and vary their communication, the student reflects further and does
    improvements, if necessary, own representations.
    The student comments clearly on a variety of phenomena in a variety of ways,
    contexts and areas where the language is used, and does
    comparisons with own experiences and knowledge.