Studieguide

Lärandemål

The student will:
-obtain knowledge of the fundamental philosophical theories underpinning nursing research
-obtain knowledge of nursing theories that influence nursing research and nursing care
-become familiar with the tradition and development of Caring Science - its history and future
- be able to integrate basic knowledge of ontology, epistemology and the ethos of Caring Science into different modules of clinical caring and nursing.
- define qualitative research
- describe sampling techniques in qualitative research
- understand ethics in nursing research
- discuss the major sources of qualitative data
- explain analysis and interpretation methods with qualitative data
- describe techniques used to evaluate research
- understand how to use qualitative research findings in evidence based nursing care
-prepare to carry out the thesis independently and under supervision

Innehåll

The student will:
-obtain knowledge of the fundamental philosophical theories underpinning nursing research
-obtain knowledge of nursing theories that influence nursing research and nursing care
-become familiar with the tradition and development of Caring Science - its history and future
- be able to integrate basic knowledge of ontology, epistemology and the ethos of Caring Science into different modules of clinical caring and nursing.
- define qualitative research
- describe sampling techniques in qualitative research
- understand ethics in nursing research
- discuss the major sources of qualitative data
- explain analysis and interpretation methods with qualitative data
- describe techniques used to evaluate research
- understand how to use qualitative research findings in evidence based nursing care
-prepare to carry out the thesis independently and under supervision

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Förkunskapskrav

Introduction to Nursing Research at Novia UAS