•   Evidence Based Nursing NU22NR01-3001 12.09.2022-27.11.2022  5 sp  (NU22D-V) +-
    Studieperiodens (kursens) lärandemål
    The student:
    - knows the profession of a nurse and its special features
    - develops an international perspective on nursing history and become familiar with nursing models, concepts, theories and traditions of caring/nursing science
    - is familiar with ethical theories, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues.
    - has fundamental knowledge, and an understanding, of cultural differences, as well as the need for cultural sensitivity in all contact with people.
    - adopts an approach to nursing care based on critical thinking and evidencebased practice and desicion-making process
    - understands the necessity of an evidence-based practice
    - has knowledge of the nursing process
    - knows how to correctly document and report nursing care according to the national health care system "
    Förkunskapskrav
    No prior prerequisites
    Studieperiodens (kursens) innehåll
    Nursing as a profession
    International perspective on nursing history and philosophy
    Nursing models, concepts, theories and traditions of caring/nursing science
    Ethical theories, values and ethical guidelines, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues.
    Cultural differences and cultural sensitivity
    Cultural awareness, and respect for individual uniqueness
    Nursing care based on critical thinking and evidence based practice and decision-making process
    Assess, plan and implement nursing care based on the patient’s needs
    Evaluate nursing care
    Finnish Care Classification FinCC
    Document and report nursing care according to the national health care system (ISBAR)
    Bedömningskriterier
    Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Lärarens/ansvarspersonens namn

    Jannica Andtfolk

    Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

    Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
    Boström, A.-M., Rudman, A., Ehrenberg, A., Gustavsson, J. P., & Wallin, L. (2013). Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–12.

    Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203.

    Gonzol, K., & Newby, C. (2013). Facilitating Clinical Reasoning in the Skills Laboratory: Reasoning Model Versus Nursing Process-Based Skills Checklist. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 34(4), 265–267.

    Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2012). The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.26 Issue( 1), 133-143.

    Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.

    Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live

    Parvan, K., Hosseini, F. A., Jasemi, M., & Thomson, B. (2021). Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 21(1), 1–12.

    Extra
    Salmela, S., Koskinen, C. & Eriksson, K. 2017. Nurse Leaders as Managers of Ethical Sustainable Caring Cultures. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(4), 871– 882.


    Salmela, S. & Nyström, L. The human being in need of nursing care – patient, customer or fellow human being? International Journal of Caring Sciences. Accepted for publication.


    Nyholm, L. & Koskinen, C. 2017. Understanding and safeguarding dignity in patient care. Nursing Ethics, 24(4), 408– 418.

    Undervisningsmetoder

    Theory lessons
    Individual work
    Group work

    Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

    For an approved performance you need to hand in, individual task, group task and exam.

    Undervisningsspråk

    Engelska

    Tajmning

    12.09.2022 - 27.11.2022

    Anmälningstid

    15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

    Grupp(er)
    • NU22D-V
    Ansvarig enhet

    Institutionen för hälsa och välfärd

    Lärare

    Jannica Andtfolk

    Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

    Introduction is mandatory



    Seminar day is mandatory



    Tentamina is mandatory



    A lecture with excercises with Anita Wikberg on intercultural communication with an Swedish speaking nursing group

    Utbildning

    Nursing

    Verksamhetspunkt

    Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

    FUI-andel

    0.00 sp

    Andel virtuell undervisning

    0.00 sp

    Vitsordsskala

    H-5

    Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

    Introduction is mandatory

    Seminar day is mandatory

    Tentamina is mandatory

    Tidtabell för examination (t.ex. tentamina, omtentamina)

    Tentamina
    Omtentamina

    The dates are in moodle

    Tid och plats

    Look at your schedule

    Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

    1 credit 27 hour this course 5 credit so 135 hours.

    Theory lessons online 20h (5ggr 4h)
    Individually work 16h
    Group work 27h
    Searching of articles 8h
    Own work (finishing assessment, reading for the exam ) 53h
    Seminary 8h
    Tentamina 3h

    Periodisering av innehållet

    Lesson 1
    Info
    History of nurses
    Article search (Gun Vestman)

    Lesson 2
    Ethics in Healthcare

    Lesson 3
    Models vs theories

    Lesson 4
    Caring and nursing

    Lesson 5
    Isbar and the nursing process

    Bedömningskriterier
    Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

    Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

    Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar