First aid and emergency preparedness (2 cr)
Code: VÅV22GV06-3007
General information
Enrollment
01.12.2023 - 30.12.2023
Timing
02.01.2024 - 28.01.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
2 op
Virtual portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
50 % Contact teaching, 50 % Distance learning
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Seats
10 - 43
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
Teachers
- Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Teacher in charge
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Scheduling groups
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open UAS: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open UAS: 0.)
- Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open UAS: 0.)
Groups
-
USS23D-VSjukskötare (YH), h23, dagstudier, Vasa
Small groups
- Grupp 1
- Grupp 2
- Grupp 3
Objective
The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations
Content
First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations
Location and time
Spring 2024
Materials
Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Teaching methods
Lessons, demonstration, practice
Completion alternatives
Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time
Further information
Compulsory attendance at all lessons
You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
Assessment methods and criteria
Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct
Qualifications
No prior knowledge required