Studieguide

Lärandemål

The student
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs
- understands the nurses role, duties and responsibilities regarding drug therapy
- understands the medication plan and can guide the patient

Innehåll

Clinical Pharmacology
Self medication
Medication technology
Medication plan
Polyfarmaci
Nurses role and responsibilities

Tid och plats

Hösten 2023

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

E-book; Gersch, C., Heimgartner, N., Rebar, C. & Willis, L. 2016. Pharmacology Made incredibly Easy.
Downie, G. 2008. Pharmacology and Medicines Managements for Nurses. (4 th Ed). London: Churchill Livingstone
Articles and material according to teachers advice

Undervisningsmetoder

Onlinekurs med introduktion io webex

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Uppgifter med absoluta deadline
schemalagd online test

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

27h/sp
Kursens totala arbete 54 h

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Inlämningsuppgifter Gk/kompletteras
Sent inlämnade uppgifter sänker vitsord

4 veckor för sent inlämnade uppgifter underkänner kurs

Periodisering av innehållet

Uppgifter varje vecka

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Online kus. internet anslutning och nerladdninga av Novias software krävs för genomförande

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Förkunskapskrav

Drug therapy and Pharmacology 2