Leadership in midwifery (3 cr)
Code: BM14FU03-3006
General information
Enrollment
01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023
Timing
02.01.2024 - 28.01.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Seats
0 - 15
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
Teachers
- Terese Österberg
- Carina Gädda
Teacher in charge
Carina Gädda
Groups
-
UBM20D-VBarnmorska (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student
- understands the importance of leadership in midwifery
- can assess the work group's resources, prioritize the tasks and the responsibilities they bring
- can identify the main principles for planning, organizing and managing operations, and have readiness to lead the work
- can coordinate and be responsible for a continuous care of the patient as a whole
- can account for management principles, the working methods of working life and can work in the work community
- can develop and understand the importance of internal and external entrepreneurship
- Understands the importance of change in healthcare and can function responsibly in the event of changes
- has insights into the midwife's professional decision-making, independence and responsibility
- has insights into the midwife's community awareness and commitment
Content
Leadership and development in midwifery
Location and time
Spring 2024, Campus Alere
Materials
Recommended literature can be found in Moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures
Self-studies
Completion alternatives
Individual assignment in the part about Leadership
Groupwork
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
Qualifications
Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care