Resource-strengthening Disability Services (5 cr)
Code: SOV22UVR104-3003
General information
Enrollment
15.06.2024 - 20.10.2024
Timing
21.10.2024 - 31.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Vasa Socionom
- Nadja Suomela
- Carita Blomström
Teacher in charge
Nadja Suomela
Scheduling groups
- Grupp 1 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
- Group 3 (Size: 30. Open UAS: 0.)
Groups
-
USO23D-VSocionom (YH), h23, dagstudier, Vasa
-
SO23ASO23A
-
SO23BSO23B
Small groups
- Grupp 1
- Grupp 2
- Group 3
Objective
The Student:
- has knowledge and perspectives on different disabilities in relation to society and underlying factors
- knows the central legislation of the disability area
- can supervise and coordinate service based on the client's needs
- can participate in the planning, realisation, development and evaluation of various Resource-strengthening forms of support in interprofessional cooperation
- can take a stand on ethical dilemmas in working with people with disabilities
- can apply working methods that promote self-determination, development, quality of life and participation for people with disabilities
Content
- the principles of human rights
- different disabilities
-societal structures and phenomena that affect functional capacity and perceptions of disabilities
-self-determination, participation and empowerment
-accessibility
-Resource-strengthening methods
-central legislation and forms of service in social care and disability services
-ethics
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
Students' understanding is on an extremely general and superficial level.Failed assignments and home exams. Students use unedited AI-generated text as their own writing. Absence/no compensation for compulsory study sessions. Does not use Novia's writing instructions as they must be used according to the examination task.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Students have in a basic way been able to observe and analyze the knowledge and have been able to make their own applied reflections.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Students have been able to observe and analyze the knowledge and in addition have shown clarity about key concepts and definitions. The text shows logic in structure and students can also make relevant, reflective parallels to worklife, legislation and client cases.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Students show strong clarity and maturity in their understanding, beyond the ordinary. Can reflect on the various phenomena in an in-depth way and can connect them to working life, legislation and client cases. Students show strong commitment to their task.
Qualifications
No previous knowledge