Study Guide

Objective

The student:
- is able to recognize and analyze the development of leadership studies in modern organizations, with an emphasis on healthcare organizations.
- is able to explain and interpret change actions in workplaces that are both inclusive and empowering for all participants
- is able to identify and describe forces of organizational change and how these can be actively worked with in order to promote innovation and entrepreneurship

Content

Change leadership theories
Strategic leadership
Evaluation Practice

Location and time

Online
9.1. Tuesday (15-17), Teams, Marica Hinders
23.1. Tuesday 15-17), Teams, Marica Hinders
6.2. Tuesday (15-17), Teams, Marica Hinders
13.2. Tuesday (9-16), Teams, Marica Hinders and Camilla Strandell-Laine

Materials

To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

Teaching methods

Lectures - 16 hours
Seminar 9 hours
Small-group work - 20 hours
Individual studies - 90 hours

Student workload

Total workload of the course: 135 hours
Of which autonomous studies: 135 hours
Of which scheduled studies: 25 hours

Further information

The course is arranged in collaboration with ARCADA.
Lectures are given in English, but written assignment(s) can be returned in either English or Swedish.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the written exam
The student can explain the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar

Qualifications

No prerequisites