Study Guide

Objective

The student:
-has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
- has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
- masters advanced drug calculation

Content

Advanced drug treatment
Cytotestatic treatment
Epidural pain relief
Fluid treatment
Blood transfusion
Patient guidance and documentation
Advanced drug calculation

Location and time

Online and campus Alere
Spring 2023

Materials

Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
Films and online material in moodle
Articles and research according to instructions

Teaching methods

Hybrid course
Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
Case and problem solving in workshops
Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

Exam schedules

Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
re take after course ended according to peppi

Student workload

27H /cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
Online test 1-5 according % scale
assgnments pass/ comlpete

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1