Studieguide

Lärandemål

The students
- have knowledge of microbiology, immunology and pathology to be able to use relevant sources of information and scientific literature and to communicate with colleagues
- acts appropriately in care situations
- understands the principles of methodology, diagnostics and bioanalytics

Innehåll

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Tid och plats

Spring 2024

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Murray, Rosenthal & Pfaller. Medical Microbiology. 8th edition.
https://www.elsevier.com/books/medical-microbiology/murray/978-0-323-29956-5

Online http://www.microbiologybook.org/book/bact-sta.htm
Roitt’s Essential Immunology 13th Edition Peter J. Delves, Seamus J. Martin, Dennis R. Burton, Ivan M. Roitt

Websites & magazines
https://www.asm.org/
http://jcm.asm.org/
https://www.thl.fi/ttr/gen/rpt/statistiker.html (THL, register över smittsamma sjukdomar)
https://thl.fi/web/infektiotaudit-ja-rokotukset/seurantajarjestelmat-ja-rekisterit/tartuntatautirekisteri/tartuntatautien-esiintyvyystilastot

Undervisningsmetoder

Advanced Study in Clinical Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology

Lectures
Self-studies
Discussions
Current Scientific Articles

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Course examination 22.02.2024
Re-examination 05.04.2024, 19.04.2024 and 03.05.2024

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

2 ECT= 54 hours of studies and lectures

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in the exam

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

None