Thesis and Maturity Test (6 cr)
Code: BAA22EX03-3001
General information
Enrollment
02.12.2024 - 02.03.2025
Timing
03.03.2025 - 31.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
6 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
17 % Contact teaching, 83 % Distance learning
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist
Teachers
- Camilla Ribacka
- Mikaela Engvall
- Camilla Höglund
Teacher in charge
Camilla Ribacka
Groups
-
UBA22D-VBioanalytiker (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student
- can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
- can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing
Content
Presentation of Thesis
Opponentship
Maturity test based on the thesis work and written expression
Location and time
Novia Vaasa, Alere
Week 21 of Spring 2025 and week x of Fall 2025
Materials
Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Teaching methods
Written thesis
Seminar
Employer connections
Presentation of thesis in public
Exam schedules
Spring 2025 week 21 presentation of thesis and maturity exam
Fall 2025 week x
Completion alternatives
Thesis
Maturity test
Further information
More information on the Moodle page of the course
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples
Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples
Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Assessment methods and criteria
Thesis is graded 0-5
Opposition of another student's work passed or failed
Maturity test is graded passed or failed
Qualifications
Theoretical studies
Basic practice courses