Research Methods (10 cr)
Code: SHV22FU02-3004
General information
Enrollment
01.12.2024 - 20.01.2025
Timing
01.01.2025 - 31.12.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
10 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Campus
Åbo, Henriksgatan 7
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care
Teachers
- Ralf Lillbacka
- Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa
- Camilla Strandell-Laine
Teacher in charge
Camilla Strandell-Laine
Groups
-
SHV24H-ÅSocial- och hälsovård, h24, högre yh, Åbo
-
SHV24H-VSocial- och hälsovård, h24, Vasa
Objective
The student:
- understands and is able to use qualitative and quantitative research and development processes and methods
- is able to apply a scientific and ethical approach in research and development activities
- is able to carry out a current work life-related development project
Content
Qualitative research methods
Quantitative research methods
Seminars
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Qualifications
No prerequisites