Skip to main content

Finnish 2Laajuus (1 cr)

Code: VÅ26FI02

Credits

1 op

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates such knowledge of Finnish as required by law (424/2003) for public employees and should show satisfactory (grades 1, 2, or 3) or good (grades 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing

Content

Texts and terminology of the student's own field
Oral and written examination

Qualifications

VÅ26FI01 Finnish 1

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.

Assessment criteria for written and oral work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views.

Assessment criteria for written and oral work
The student has followed the instructions for the written and oral work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.

Criteria for evaluation of written or oral work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written or oral work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).

The student has followed the instructions for the written and oral work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.